技术导入的新采购策略

N. Lareau
{"title":"技术导入的新采购策略","authors":"N. Lareau","doi":"10.1109/NAECON.1996.517741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even in times of increased defense spending, defense systems have been required to operate beyond their originally estimated lifetimes. Periodic technology insertion helps to remedy parts and performance obsolescence by keeping a fielded system more in tune with commercial designs. The benefits of keeping a design close to the commercial marketplace are many, but the primary results are reduced parts costs and reduced design labor costs. Unfortunately, a recurring problem with technology insertion efforts is that the government does not own the data rights to the original design, which makes form, fit, and functional compatibility requirements difficult to fulfill by any but the original supplier of the system. If government ownership is maintained by using an independent design agent, lower costs are possible, since the resultant system is not tied to a single manufacturing source. With governmental ownership of the design, the government can shop for low cost production. A downside to governmental ownership of the design exists if selecting a production source and first-article qualification lengthens the procurement cycle. These delays build obsolescence into the system. This problem can be eliminated by selecting a preferred manufacturing source early in the technology insertion design phase. Having the preferred source manufacture the first articles allows the reprocurement data package, the design, and the production line to be qualified simultaneously. This paper details the use of technology insertion, government ownership of independent design agent produced designs, and preferred manufacturing sources as the basis for a cohesive business plan to economically reduce parts and performance obsolescence problems in aging military systems. Actual results for the use of this plan in several recent technology insertion projects are discussed.","PeriodicalId":332694,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference NAECON 1996","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New procurement strategy for technology insertion\",\"authors\":\"N. Lareau\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAECON.1996.517741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even in times of increased defense spending, defense systems have been required to operate beyond their originally estimated lifetimes. Periodic technology insertion helps to remedy parts and performance obsolescence by keeping a fielded system more in tune with commercial designs. The benefits of keeping a design close to the commercial marketplace are many, but the primary results are reduced parts costs and reduced design labor costs. Unfortunately, a recurring problem with technology insertion efforts is that the government does not own the data rights to the original design, which makes form, fit, and functional compatibility requirements difficult to fulfill by any but the original supplier of the system. If government ownership is maintained by using an independent design agent, lower costs are possible, since the resultant system is not tied to a single manufacturing source. With governmental ownership of the design, the government can shop for low cost production. A downside to governmental ownership of the design exists if selecting a production source and first-article qualification lengthens the procurement cycle. These delays build obsolescence into the system. This problem can be eliminated by selecting a preferred manufacturing source early in the technology insertion design phase. Having the preferred source manufacture the first articles allows the reprocurement data package, the design, and the production line to be qualified simultaneously. This paper details the use of technology insertion, government ownership of independent design agent produced designs, and preferred manufacturing sources as the basis for a cohesive business plan to economically reduce parts and performance obsolescence problems in aging military systems. Actual results for the use of this plan in several recent technology insertion projects are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference NAECON 1996\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference NAECON 1996\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1996.517741\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference NAECON 1996","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1996.517741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

即使在国防开支增加的时候,国防系统也被要求超出其最初估计的使用寿命。通过使现场系统与商业设计更加协调,定期的技术插入有助于纠正零件和性能过时。让设计贴近商业市场有很多好处,但主要的结果是降低了零件成本和设计人工成本。不幸的是,技术插入工作的一个反复出现的问题是,政府不拥有原始设计的数据权利,这使得除了系统的原始供应商之外,其他任何人都难以满足形式、适合性和功能兼容性要求。如果通过使用独立的设计代理来维持政府所有权,则可能降低成本,因为最终的系统不依赖于单一的制造来源。由于政府拥有设计所有权,政府可以购买低成本的产品。如果选择生产来源和首件资格延长了采购周期,那么政府拥有设计所有权的不利之处就存在。这些延迟会使系统过时。这个问题可以通过在技术插入设计阶段早期选择首选制造源来消除。首选源制造第一批物品允许再采购数据包、设计和生产线同时合格。本文详细介绍了技术插入、独立设计代理生产设计的政府所有权和首选制造来源的使用,作为一个有凝聚力的商业计划的基础,以经济地减少老化军事系统中的零件和性能过时问题。讨论了在最近的几个技术插入项目中使用该方案的实际结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New procurement strategy for technology insertion
Even in times of increased defense spending, defense systems have been required to operate beyond their originally estimated lifetimes. Periodic technology insertion helps to remedy parts and performance obsolescence by keeping a fielded system more in tune with commercial designs. The benefits of keeping a design close to the commercial marketplace are many, but the primary results are reduced parts costs and reduced design labor costs. Unfortunately, a recurring problem with technology insertion efforts is that the government does not own the data rights to the original design, which makes form, fit, and functional compatibility requirements difficult to fulfill by any but the original supplier of the system. If government ownership is maintained by using an independent design agent, lower costs are possible, since the resultant system is not tied to a single manufacturing source. With governmental ownership of the design, the government can shop for low cost production. A downside to governmental ownership of the design exists if selecting a production source and first-article qualification lengthens the procurement cycle. These delays build obsolescence into the system. This problem can be eliminated by selecting a preferred manufacturing source early in the technology insertion design phase. Having the preferred source manufacture the first articles allows the reprocurement data package, the design, and the production line to be qualified simultaneously. This paper details the use of technology insertion, government ownership of independent design agent produced designs, and preferred manufacturing sources as the basis for a cohesive business plan to economically reduce parts and performance obsolescence problems in aging military systems. Actual results for the use of this plan in several recent technology insertion projects are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信