港口环境中潜水员的电探测

R. Lennartsson, E. Dalberg, T. Fristedt, E. Nolander, L. Persson
{"title":"港口环境中潜水员的电探测","authors":"R. Lennartsson, E. Dalberg, T. Fristedt, E. Nolander, L. Persson","doi":"10.23919/OCEANS.2009.5422404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we compare the detection performance of underwater electric-field sensors against divers using three different detection algorithms (matched filter, non-coherent and quadrature detectors). The detection performance is quantified and presented as ROC-curves. The empirical results are based on measurements of signatures from divers with open circuit breathing systems. They were performed during two sea-trials in diverse environments. One site is a remote area with relatively low anthropogenic activity and the other site is a busy container terminal in the port of Gothenburg, both sites in Sweden. Of the three detectors evaluated, no single detector stands out. This may imply the usefulness of fusion as a means of improving the performance in the future. In Gothenburg harbor detection of divers can be performed at signal-to-noise ratios from −20 to 0 dB, depending on the noise situation. In addition to detection, it is found that it is possible to classify a contact as a diver.","PeriodicalId":119977,"journal":{"name":"OCEANS 2009","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electric detection of divers in harbor environments\",\"authors\":\"R. Lennartsson, E. Dalberg, T. Fristedt, E. Nolander, L. Persson\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/OCEANS.2009.5422404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we compare the detection performance of underwater electric-field sensors against divers using three different detection algorithms (matched filter, non-coherent and quadrature detectors). The detection performance is quantified and presented as ROC-curves. The empirical results are based on measurements of signatures from divers with open circuit breathing systems. They were performed during two sea-trials in diverse environments. One site is a remote area with relatively low anthropogenic activity and the other site is a busy container terminal in the port of Gothenburg, both sites in Sweden. Of the three detectors evaluated, no single detector stands out. This may imply the usefulness of fusion as a means of improving the performance in the future. In Gothenburg harbor detection of divers can be performed at signal-to-noise ratios from −20 to 0 dB, depending on the noise situation. In addition to detection, it is found that it is possible to classify a contact as a diver.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OCEANS 2009\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OCEANS 2009\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS.2009.5422404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCEANS 2009","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/OCEANS.2009.5422404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在本文中,我们比较了水下电场传感器对潜水员使用三种不同的检测算法(匹配滤波器,非相干和正交检测器)的检测性能。检测性能被量化并以roc曲线表示。经验结果是基于对潜水员的特征测量与开路呼吸系统。他们在不同的环境中进行了两次海上试验。一个地点是一个偏远地区,人类活动相对较少,另一个地点是哥德堡港一个繁忙的集装箱码头,两个地点都在瑞典。在评估的三个探测器中,没有一个探测器脱颖而出。这可能意味着融合在未来作为一种改善性能的手段是有用的。在哥德堡港口,潜水员的检测可以在- 20到0 dB的信噪比下进行,具体取决于噪声情况。除了检测之外,还发现可以将接触者分类为潜水员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electric detection of divers in harbor environments
In this paper we compare the detection performance of underwater electric-field sensors against divers using three different detection algorithms (matched filter, non-coherent and quadrature detectors). The detection performance is quantified and presented as ROC-curves. The empirical results are based on measurements of signatures from divers with open circuit breathing systems. They were performed during two sea-trials in diverse environments. One site is a remote area with relatively low anthropogenic activity and the other site is a busy container terminal in the port of Gothenburg, both sites in Sweden. Of the three detectors evaluated, no single detector stands out. This may imply the usefulness of fusion as a means of improving the performance in the future. In Gothenburg harbor detection of divers can be performed at signal-to-noise ratios from −20 to 0 dB, depending on the noise situation. In addition to detection, it is found that it is possible to classify a contact as a diver.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信