经典逻辑作为嗜中性逻辑的一个子类

Angelo de Oliveira, Marina Nogueira Carvalho de Oliveira
{"title":"经典逻辑作为嗜中性逻辑的一个子类","authors":"Angelo de Oliveira, Marina Nogueira Carvalho de Oliveira","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.3830094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is customary in mathematics that almost all new developments maintain compatibility with what is already proved and accepted. Following this way, neutrosophic logic has the classical logic as subset. However, in mathematics, all the affirmations must be proved first to be accepted, so the claim that the neutrosophic logic encompass classical logic must be also proved. Thus, this paper show that the main properties of the classical logic hold when translated to neutrosophic form at propositional level.","PeriodicalId":192295,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neutrosophic Science","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classical Logic as a subclass of Neutrosophic Logic\",\"authors\":\"Angelo de Oliveira, Marina Nogueira Carvalho de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.3830094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is customary in mathematics that almost all new developments maintain compatibility with what is already proved and accepted. Following this way, neutrosophic logic has the classical logic as subset. However, in mathematics, all the affirmations must be proved first to be accepted, so the claim that the neutrosophic logic encompass classical logic must be also proved. Thus, this paper show that the main properties of the classical logic hold when translated to neutrosophic form at propositional level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neutrosophic Science\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neutrosophic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3830094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neutrosophic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3830094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在数学中,习惯上几乎所有的新发展都与已经被证明和接受的东西保持一致。按照这种方式,嗜中性逻辑以经典逻辑为子集。然而,在数学中,所有的断言必须首先被证明才能被接受,所以中性逻辑包含经典逻辑的主张也必须被证明。因此,本文证明经典逻辑的主要性质在命题水平上转化为嗜中性形式时仍然成立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classical Logic as a subclass of Neutrosophic Logic
It is customary in mathematics that almost all new developments maintain compatibility with what is already proved and accepted. Following this way, neutrosophic logic has the classical logic as subset. However, in mathematics, all the affirmations must be proved first to be accepted, so the claim that the neutrosophic logic encompass classical logic must be also proved. Thus, this paper show that the main properties of the classical logic hold when translated to neutrosophic form at propositional level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信