高速公路车辆自组织网络中路由协议评价的定量模型

Florent Kaisser, C. Johnen, V. Vèque
{"title":"高速公路车辆自组织网络中路由协议评价的定量模型","authors":"Florent Kaisser, C. Johnen, V. Vèque","doi":"10.1109/VNC.2010.5698255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our main goal is to provide the best management protocols for vehicular Ad Hoc network (VANET), more precisely, to determine the best routing protocol. In this paper, we focus on VANET built on highway where cars run in the same direction. We introduce a quantitative model in order to evaluate existing routing protocols. We use this model to compare two main classes of routing protocols, topological protocols and geographic protocols. The studied criterium is the scalability property, i.e. performance preservation in spite of the substantially increasing of network size.","PeriodicalId":257339,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative model for evaluate routing protocols in a vehicular ad hoc networks on highway\",\"authors\":\"Florent Kaisser, C. Johnen, V. Vèque\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VNC.2010.5698255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our main goal is to provide the best management protocols for vehicular Ad Hoc network (VANET), more precisely, to determine the best routing protocol. In this paper, we focus on VANET built on highway where cars run in the same direction. We introduce a quantitative model in order to evaluate existing routing protocols. We use this model to compare two main classes of routing protocols, topological protocols and geographic protocols. The studied criterium is the scalability property, i.e. performance preservation in spite of the substantially increasing of network size.\",\"PeriodicalId\":257339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VNC.2010.5698255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VNC.2010.5698255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

我们的主要目标是为车载自组织网络(VANET)提供最佳的管理协议,更准确地说,是确定最佳的路由协议。在本文中,我们的重点是建立在高速公路上的VANET,车辆在同一方向上运行。为了评估现有的路由协议,我们引入了一个定量模型。我们使用这个模型来比较两类主要的路由协议:拓扑协议和地理协议。研究的标准是可扩展性,即在网络规模大幅增加的情况下仍能保持性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative model for evaluate routing protocols in a vehicular ad hoc networks on highway
Our main goal is to provide the best management protocols for vehicular Ad Hoc network (VANET), more precisely, to determine the best routing protocol. In this paper, we focus on VANET built on highway where cars run in the same direction. We introduce a quantitative model in order to evaluate existing routing protocols. We use this model to compare two main classes of routing protocols, topological protocols and geographic protocols. The studied criterium is the scalability property, i.e. performance preservation in spite of the substantially increasing of network size.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信