12.阿尔萨基帝国的经济动态

Lara Fabian
{"title":"12.阿尔萨基帝国的经济动态","authors":"Lara Fabian","doi":"10.1515/9783110607642-019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This brief consideration of the economic processes in the Arsakid Empire picks up where the previous chapter on hypotheses concerning processes and patterns in the Hellenistic world ends. It considers the Arsakid Empire, looking at both the core territory stretching across Mesopotamia and Iran, and the halo of polities that has increasingly come to be understood as the “Parthian Commonwealth,” including both smaller and larger vassal kingdoms along the flanks of the Arsakid heartland.1 A synthetic elucidation of the dynamic processes by which the Arsakid Empire came to incorporate these diverse local spaces on an economic level – or how the local spaces reacted to the new forms of Arsakid control – lies out of reach of current scholarship. The available documentary, archaeological, and historical evidence is pointillistic and often internally inconsistent, problems that were discussed at more length in other chapters here as well as in our previous volume.2 The attempt in what follows is rather to consider how the general framework laid out by von Reden with respect to the Hellenistic world can be applied in the context of the Arsakid Empire, looking for moments of continuity, rupture, or gradual divergence. A fundamental question here is whether and in what ways the economy of the Arsakid Empire came to function as an “overarching fiscal-military” regime of the type described by von Reden for the Hellenistic world.3 The explicit comparison of the Hellenistic and Arsakid Empires is not intended to suggest that the Arsakid world should be understood fundamentally, or even primarily, as a product of the Hellenistic world. However much the rise of the Arsakid dynasty in the third century  was predicated on preconditions in the Hellenistic Near East, and however much once-Seleukid territory the Arsakids came to control over the course of second and first centuries , the logic of their empire developed atop a wide range of cultural substrata – drawing most obviously on pre-Seleukid Achaemenid models of the Iranian Plateau (which were also a part of the Hellenistic legacy), but also on patterns among the Parni, from whom the dynasty emerged.4 At the","PeriodicalId":128613,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Ancient Afro-Eurasian Economies","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"12.B Economic Dynamics in the Arsakid Empire\",\"authors\":\"Lara Fabian\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110607642-019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This brief consideration of the economic processes in the Arsakid Empire picks up where the previous chapter on hypotheses concerning processes and patterns in the Hellenistic world ends. It considers the Arsakid Empire, looking at both the core territory stretching across Mesopotamia and Iran, and the halo of polities that has increasingly come to be understood as the “Parthian Commonwealth,” including both smaller and larger vassal kingdoms along the flanks of the Arsakid heartland.1 A synthetic elucidation of the dynamic processes by which the Arsakid Empire came to incorporate these diverse local spaces on an economic level – or how the local spaces reacted to the new forms of Arsakid control – lies out of reach of current scholarship. The available documentary, archaeological, and historical evidence is pointillistic and often internally inconsistent, problems that were discussed at more length in other chapters here as well as in our previous volume.2 The attempt in what follows is rather to consider how the general framework laid out by von Reden with respect to the Hellenistic world can be applied in the context of the Arsakid Empire, looking for moments of continuity, rupture, or gradual divergence. A fundamental question here is whether and in what ways the economy of the Arsakid Empire came to function as an “overarching fiscal-military” regime of the type described by von Reden for the Hellenistic world.3 The explicit comparison of the Hellenistic and Arsakid Empires is not intended to suggest that the Arsakid world should be understood fundamentally, or even primarily, as a product of the Hellenistic world. However much the rise of the Arsakid dynasty in the third century  was predicated on preconditions in the Hellenistic Near East, and however much once-Seleukid territory the Arsakids came to control over the course of second and first centuries , the logic of their empire developed atop a wide range of cultural substrata – drawing most obviously on pre-Seleukid Achaemenid models of the Iranian Plateau (which were also a part of the Hellenistic legacy), but also on patterns among the Parni, from whom the dynasty emerged.4 At the\",\"PeriodicalId\":128613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handbook of Ancient Afro-Eurasian Economies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handbook of Ancient Afro-Eurasian Economies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607642-019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Ancient Afro-Eurasian Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110607642-019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇对阿尔萨基帝国经济过程的简短论述是在上一章关于希腊化世界的过程和模式的假设结束的地方进行的。它考虑了阿尔萨基帝国,既包括横跨美索不达米亚和伊朗的核心领土,也包括日益被理解为“帕提亚联邦”的政治光环,包括沿阿尔萨基心脏地带侧翼的大小附庸王国对阿尔萨基帝国在经济层面上整合这些不同地方空间的动态过程的综合阐释,或者对当地空间对阿尔萨基控制的新形式的反应,目前的学术研究还无法达到。现有的文献、考古和历史证据都是点状的,而且往往在内部不一致,这些问题在这里的其他章节以及我们的前一卷中进行了更详细的讨论接下来的尝试是考虑von Reden关于希腊化世界的总体框架如何应用于Arsakid帝国的背景下,寻找连续性,断裂或逐渐分化的时刻。这里的一个基本问题是,阿尔萨基帝国的经济是否以及以何种方式成为冯·雷登描述的希腊化世界的那种“压倒一切的财政-军事”政权希腊化帝国和阿尔萨基帝国的明确比较,并不是要表明,阿尔萨基世界应该被从根本上理解,甚至主要是作为希腊化世界的产物。无论阿尔萨基王朝在三世纪的崛起是以希腊化的近东为前提的,无论阿尔萨基王朝在二世纪和一世纪期间控制了多少曾经的塞勒基德领土,他们帝国的逻辑都是在广泛的文化基础上发展起来的——最明显的是借鉴了塞勒基德之前的伊朗高原的阿契美尼德模式(这也是希腊化遗产的一部分)。而且还研究了帕尔尼人的模式,这个王朝就是从帕尔尼人那里产生的在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
12.B Economic Dynamics in the Arsakid Empire
This brief consideration of the economic processes in the Arsakid Empire picks up where the previous chapter on hypotheses concerning processes and patterns in the Hellenistic world ends. It considers the Arsakid Empire, looking at both the core territory stretching across Mesopotamia and Iran, and the halo of polities that has increasingly come to be understood as the “Parthian Commonwealth,” including both smaller and larger vassal kingdoms along the flanks of the Arsakid heartland.1 A synthetic elucidation of the dynamic processes by which the Arsakid Empire came to incorporate these diverse local spaces on an economic level – or how the local spaces reacted to the new forms of Arsakid control – lies out of reach of current scholarship. The available documentary, archaeological, and historical evidence is pointillistic and often internally inconsistent, problems that were discussed at more length in other chapters here as well as in our previous volume.2 The attempt in what follows is rather to consider how the general framework laid out by von Reden with respect to the Hellenistic world can be applied in the context of the Arsakid Empire, looking for moments of continuity, rupture, or gradual divergence. A fundamental question here is whether and in what ways the economy of the Arsakid Empire came to function as an “overarching fiscal-military” regime of the type described by von Reden for the Hellenistic world.3 The explicit comparison of the Hellenistic and Arsakid Empires is not intended to suggest that the Arsakid world should be understood fundamentally, or even primarily, as a product of the Hellenistic world. However much the rise of the Arsakid dynasty in the third century  was predicated on preconditions in the Hellenistic Near East, and however much once-Seleukid territory the Arsakids came to control over the course of second and first centuries , the logic of their empire developed atop a wide range of cultural substrata – drawing most obviously on pre-Seleukid Achaemenid models of the Iranian Plateau (which were also a part of the Hellenistic legacy), but also on patterns among the Parni, from whom the dynasty emerged.4 At the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信