利用超声胎儿参数预测成功引产

W. Hassan, Fatin Shallal, A. Roomi
{"title":"利用超声胎儿参数预测成功引产","authors":"W. Hassan, Fatin Shallal, A. Roomi","doi":"10.2174/1573404817666210105151803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n Induction of labor (IOL) is a common obstetrical procedure. Bishop's score was the single\npredictor element used by practitioners to assess the risk of failure, which led to an increase in cesarean sections (CS).\nUltrasound (US) examination was proposed since the variability limitations of Bishop score warranted alternative\nassessment tools.\n\n\n\n This study verifies how the US and other maternal parameters are used in the transperineal approach as an\nindication and as a predictor of successful induction.\n\n\n\n A prospective clinical study of 100 participants with term singleton pregnancy referred for IOL\nand who fit the criteria of this study. Their maternal parameters and fetal head to perineum distance (HPD), measured by\nthe transperineal US, were calculated before the induction. After the induction, the patients were stratified into two\ngroups, which are vaginal delivery (68%) and CS (32%). The estimated time interval to delivery was also recorded.\n\n\n\n None of the maternal parameters was significant; the P-values of maternal age, parity, body mass index (BMI),\ngestational age, and weight of the fetus is 0.75, 0.75, 0.69, 0.81, and 0.81, respectively. One-way ANOVA test estimated\nthe most significant factors for inducing labor. Fetal HPD and induction to delivery interval were remarkably significant\nin both groups <0.0001.\n\n\n\nThe shorter the HPD (<47.65±1.66 mm), the higher the possibility of vaginal delivery and a shorter delivery\ninterval. By contrast, the longer HPD (>52.56±1.93mm), the lower the possibility of vaginal delivery and a longer\ndelivery interval. These promising results may serve as a valuable tool in predicting a mode of delivery.\n\n","PeriodicalId":371340,"journal":{"name":"Current Womens Health Reviews","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Successful Induction of labor Using Ultrasonic Fetal Parameters\",\"authors\":\"W. Hassan, Fatin Shallal, A. Roomi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573404817666210105151803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\n Induction of labor (IOL) is a common obstetrical procedure. Bishop's score was the single\\npredictor element used by practitioners to assess the risk of failure, which led to an increase in cesarean sections (CS).\\nUltrasound (US) examination was proposed since the variability limitations of Bishop score warranted alternative\\nassessment tools.\\n\\n\\n\\n This study verifies how the US and other maternal parameters are used in the transperineal approach as an\\nindication and as a predictor of successful induction.\\n\\n\\n\\n A prospective clinical study of 100 participants with term singleton pregnancy referred for IOL\\nand who fit the criteria of this study. Their maternal parameters and fetal head to perineum distance (HPD), measured by\\nthe transperineal US, were calculated before the induction. After the induction, the patients were stratified into two\\ngroups, which are vaginal delivery (68%) and CS (32%). The estimated time interval to delivery was also recorded.\\n\\n\\n\\n None of the maternal parameters was significant; the P-values of maternal age, parity, body mass index (BMI),\\ngestational age, and weight of the fetus is 0.75, 0.75, 0.69, 0.81, and 0.81, respectively. One-way ANOVA test estimated\\nthe most significant factors for inducing labor. Fetal HPD and induction to delivery interval were remarkably significant\\nin both groups <0.0001.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe shorter the HPD (<47.65±1.66 mm), the higher the possibility of vaginal delivery and a shorter delivery\\ninterval. By contrast, the longer HPD (>52.56±1.93mm), the lower the possibility of vaginal delivery and a longer\\ndelivery interval. These promising results may serve as a valuable tool in predicting a mode of delivery.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":371340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Womens Health Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404817666210105151803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Womens Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404817666210105151803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

引产(IOL)是一种常见的产科手术。Bishop评分是从业人员用来评估失败风险的单一预测因素,这导致了剖宫产(CS)的增加。由于Bishop评分的可变性限制,建议采用超声(US)检查。本研究验证了如何将US和其他母体参数用于经会阴入路,作为诱导成功的指示和预测因子。一项前瞻性临床研究,涉及100名符合本研究标准的IOLand足月单胎妊娠患者。引产前计算母体参数和经会阴US测量的胎头至会阴距离(HPD)。诱导后将患者分为阴道分娩组(68%)和CS组(32%)。估计的交货时间间隔也被记录下来。母体参数均无显著性差异;产妇年龄、胎次、体重指数(BMI)、胎龄、胎儿体重的p值分别为0.75、0.75、0.69、0.81、0.81。单因素方差分析估计引产的最显著因素。两组胎儿HPD及诱导分娩间隔(52.56±1.93mm)差异均有统计学意义,阴道分娩可能性越低,分娩间隔越长。这些有希望的结果可以作为预测交付模式的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Successful Induction of labor Using Ultrasonic Fetal Parameters
Induction of labor (IOL) is a common obstetrical procedure. Bishop's score was the single predictor element used by practitioners to assess the risk of failure, which led to an increase in cesarean sections (CS). Ultrasound (US) examination was proposed since the variability limitations of Bishop score warranted alternative assessment tools. This study verifies how the US and other maternal parameters are used in the transperineal approach as an indication and as a predictor of successful induction. A prospective clinical study of 100 participants with term singleton pregnancy referred for IOL and who fit the criteria of this study. Their maternal parameters and fetal head to perineum distance (HPD), measured by the transperineal US, were calculated before the induction. After the induction, the patients were stratified into two groups, which are vaginal delivery (68%) and CS (32%). The estimated time interval to delivery was also recorded. None of the maternal parameters was significant; the P-values of maternal age, parity, body mass index (BMI), gestational age, and weight of the fetus is 0.75, 0.75, 0.69, 0.81, and 0.81, respectively. One-way ANOVA test estimated the most significant factors for inducing labor. Fetal HPD and induction to delivery interval were remarkably significant in both groups <0.0001. The shorter the HPD (<47.65±1.66 mm), the higher the possibility of vaginal delivery and a shorter delivery interval. By contrast, the longer HPD (>52.56±1.93mm), the lower the possibility of vaginal delivery and a longer delivery interval. These promising results may serve as a valuable tool in predicting a mode of delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信