{"title":"模拟、具体化和自由","authors":"Ted Gemberling","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.89595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussions of computer technology often touch on matters of free will. Can living organisms, especially human beings, be interpreted as like computers? Much writing on computers today assumes that digital technology shows freedom of the will is illusory. Charles S. Peirce (1839-1914) had quite a bit to say about the freedom of the will and its relation to the laws of nature. This chapter provides evidence from a number of writers on computers and related matters which bears on his analysis. Peirce’s category of Firstness has a great deal to contribute to our understanding of freedom as well as human responsibility, but its true meaning requires quite a bit of explanation.","PeriodicalId":269199,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive and Intermedial Semiotics","volume":"592 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analog, Embodiment, and Freedom\",\"authors\":\"Ted Gemberling\",\"doi\":\"10.5772/intechopen.89595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Discussions of computer technology often touch on matters of free will. Can living organisms, especially human beings, be interpreted as like computers? Much writing on computers today assumes that digital technology shows freedom of the will is illusory. Charles S. Peirce (1839-1914) had quite a bit to say about the freedom of the will and its relation to the laws of nature. This chapter provides evidence from a number of writers on computers and related matters which bears on his analysis. Peirce’s category of Firstness has a great deal to contribute to our understanding of freedom as well as human responsibility, but its true meaning requires quite a bit of explanation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive and Intermedial Semiotics\",\"volume\":\"592 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive and Intermedial Semiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive and Intermedial Semiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
关于计算机技术的讨论经常涉及自由意志的问题。生物体，尤其是人类，可以被理解为像计算机一样吗?如今很多关于电脑的文章都认为，数字技术显示的意志自由是虚幻的。查尔斯S.皮尔斯(Charles S. Peirce, 1839-1914)对意志自由及其与自然法则的关系有很多话要说。本章提供了一些关于计算机和相关问题的作者的证据，这些证据与他的分析有关。皮尔斯的第一范畴对我们对自由和人类责任的理解有很大的贡献，但它的真正含义需要相当多的解释。
Discussions of computer technology often touch on matters of free will. Can living organisms, especially human beings, be interpreted as like computers? Much writing on computers today assumes that digital technology shows freedom of the will is illusory. Charles S. Peirce (1839-1914) had quite a bit to say about the freedom of the will and its relation to the laws of nature. This chapter provides evidence from a number of writers on computers and related matters which bears on his analysis. Peirce’s category of Firstness has a great deal to contribute to our understanding of freedom as well as human responsibility, but its true meaning requires quite a bit of explanation.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
