目标能见度指数

D. Khaustov, Oleksandr Kyrychuk, T. Stakh, Y. Khaustov, Roman Sidor, O. Burashnikov, Y. Ryzhov, Y. Nastishin
{"title":"目标能见度指数","authors":"D. Khaustov, Oleksandr Kyrychuk, T. Stakh, Y. Khaustov, Roman Sidor, O. Burashnikov, Y. Ryzhov, Y. Nastishin","doi":"10.33577/2312-4458.28.2023.69-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantitative description of the quality of images from the military sight-seeing systems, particularly those of armored vehicles, implies specific approaches different from those used in traditional image processing for civilian needs. Our analysis of the literature shows that there are several disadvantages in the definitions of the quantitative image quality indices, which makes them inapplicable for the characterization of targets in images from military sight-seeing systems. First, quantitative indices describing the quality of images introduced for civilian applications and techniques for their measurements are not target-oriented. In most cases, image quality indices available in the literature characterize the image as a whole but turn out to be irrelevant to the visibility and conspicuity of a target. High image quality indices do not guarantee high visibility and conspicuity of a target. Contrarily, frequently high contrast and thereby visibility of a target is accompanied by abnormal (enormously high or low) lighting of the background, target, or both, which enhances the visibility and conspicuity of the target but results in low-quality indices of the image as a whole. Second, expressions for the contrast, visibility, and conspicuity of a target available in the literature are not symmetric with respect to zero and some of them are singular functions. We claim that an image quality index describing the target visibility should satisfy, at least, the following requirements. First, the notion of the threshold local contrast, still (or no longer) resolved by human eyes, must be involved in the definition of visibility. Second, the visibility index should not be a singular function. Third, visibility is a notion strongly related to the neuronal response of the human brain and, thus, should be in the form of an activation function. Forth, the target visibility index should be of the probability character. Fifth, the visibility index should be target-oriented. In this paper, we propose an expression defining the target visibility index which satisfies all five requirements listed above and develop a technique for its measurement based on the measurements of brightness profile along a line and calculation of the local contrast of the target. The measurements of the target visibility index are illustrated for the partial (visible and infrared) images and for images fused by algorithms of different target-oriented image fusion methods.","PeriodicalId":410766,"journal":{"name":"Military Technical Collection","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Target visibility index\",\"authors\":\"D. Khaustov, Oleksandr Kyrychuk, T. Stakh, Y. Khaustov, Roman Sidor, O. Burashnikov, Y. Ryzhov, Y. Nastishin\",\"doi\":\"10.33577/2312-4458.28.2023.69-76\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quantitative description of the quality of images from the military sight-seeing systems, particularly those of armored vehicles, implies specific approaches different from those used in traditional image processing for civilian needs. Our analysis of the literature shows that there are several disadvantages in the definitions of the quantitative image quality indices, which makes them inapplicable for the characterization of targets in images from military sight-seeing systems. First, quantitative indices describing the quality of images introduced for civilian applications and techniques for their measurements are not target-oriented. In most cases, image quality indices available in the literature characterize the image as a whole but turn out to be irrelevant to the visibility and conspicuity of a target. High image quality indices do not guarantee high visibility and conspicuity of a target. Contrarily, frequently high contrast and thereby visibility of a target is accompanied by abnormal (enormously high or low) lighting of the background, target, or both, which enhances the visibility and conspicuity of the target but results in low-quality indices of the image as a whole. Second, expressions for the contrast, visibility, and conspicuity of a target available in the literature are not symmetric with respect to zero and some of them are singular functions. We claim that an image quality index describing the target visibility should satisfy, at least, the following requirements. First, the notion of the threshold local contrast, still (or no longer) resolved by human eyes, must be involved in the definition of visibility. Second, the visibility index should not be a singular function. Third, visibility is a notion strongly related to the neuronal response of the human brain and, thus, should be in the form of an activation function. Forth, the target visibility index should be of the probability character. Fifth, the visibility index should be target-oriented. In this paper, we propose an expression defining the target visibility index which satisfies all five requirements listed above and develop a technique for its measurement based on the measurements of brightness profile along a line and calculation of the local contrast of the target. The measurements of the target visibility index are illustrated for the partial (visible and infrared) images and for images fused by algorithms of different target-oriented image fusion methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Military Technical Collection\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Military Technical Collection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33577/2312-4458.28.2023.69-76\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Technical Collection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33577/2312-4458.28.2023.69-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对军事观光系统,特别是装甲车辆的图像质量的定量描述,意味着不同于用于民用需要的传统图像处理的具体方法。通过对文献的分析,我们发现定量图像质量指标的定义存在一些缺陷,这使得它们不适用于军事观光系统图像中目标的表征。首先,描述用于民用应用的图像质量的定量指标及其测量技术不是面向目标的。在大多数情况下,文献中可用的图像质量指标将图像作为一个整体进行表征,但结果与目标的可见性和显著性无关。高图像质量指数并不能保证目标的高可见性和显著性。相反,高对比度导致目标可见往往伴随着背景、目标或两者的异常光照(极高或极低),这增强了目标的可见性和显著性,但导致图像整体质量指标较低。其次,文献中关于目标的对比、可见性和显著性的表达式相对于零是不对称的,其中一些是奇异函数。我们认为描述目标可见性的图像质量指数至少应满足以下要求。首先,阈值局部对比度的概念,仍然(或不再)由人眼解决,必须涉及到能见度的定义。其次,可见性指数不应该是一个单一的函数。第三,可见性是一个与人类大脑的神经元反应密切相关的概念,因此,应该以激活函数的形式存在。第四,目标可见性指标应具有概率特征。第五,可见度指标要有针对性。本文提出了满足上述五种要求的目标可见性指数的定义表达式,并开发了一种基于直线亮度轮廓测量和目标局部对比度计算的目标可见性指数测量技术。给出了部分(可见光和红外)图像和不同目标融合算法融合的图像的目标可见性指数的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Target visibility index
Quantitative description of the quality of images from the military sight-seeing systems, particularly those of armored vehicles, implies specific approaches different from those used in traditional image processing for civilian needs. Our analysis of the literature shows that there are several disadvantages in the definitions of the quantitative image quality indices, which makes them inapplicable for the characterization of targets in images from military sight-seeing systems. First, quantitative indices describing the quality of images introduced for civilian applications and techniques for their measurements are not target-oriented. In most cases, image quality indices available in the literature characterize the image as a whole but turn out to be irrelevant to the visibility and conspicuity of a target. High image quality indices do not guarantee high visibility and conspicuity of a target. Contrarily, frequently high contrast and thereby visibility of a target is accompanied by abnormal (enormously high or low) lighting of the background, target, or both, which enhances the visibility and conspicuity of the target but results in low-quality indices of the image as a whole. Second, expressions for the contrast, visibility, and conspicuity of a target available in the literature are not symmetric with respect to zero and some of them are singular functions. We claim that an image quality index describing the target visibility should satisfy, at least, the following requirements. First, the notion of the threshold local contrast, still (or no longer) resolved by human eyes, must be involved in the definition of visibility. Second, the visibility index should not be a singular function. Third, visibility is a notion strongly related to the neuronal response of the human brain and, thus, should be in the form of an activation function. Forth, the target visibility index should be of the probability character. Fifth, the visibility index should be target-oriented. In this paper, we propose an expression defining the target visibility index which satisfies all five requirements listed above and develop a technique for its measurement based on the measurements of brightness profile along a line and calculation of the local contrast of the target. The measurements of the target visibility index are illustrated for the partial (visible and infrared) images and for images fused by algorithms of different target-oriented image fusion methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信