评估书面文字:工科学生的经验

H. Israel, Henk J. de Jager
{"title":"评估书面文字:工科学生的经验","authors":"H. Israel, Henk J. de Jager","doi":"10.1109/AFRCON.2009.5308073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vygotsky's (1987) premise is that students write to learn, and that this learning stretches across the curriculum. The lecturer in the field of engineering has therefore to evaluate teaching and learning through writing tasks as they are traditionally known, and ask why assessment focuses on students' weaknesses - why does assessment instead not meet the student at his point of strength, and lead him from there? It is at this point that the various factors contributing to the learning experience of the student merge into one multi-faceted concept - assessment. Assessment skills are part of the learning process, yet equipping engineering lecturers with such skills in theory and practice is minimal. Assumptions are that if one is qualified in a content area, one can teach that content and objectively assess one's students. This is not always true. Reviewing assessment of the written word is vital because language is the means to academic success. The responsibility lying with the engineering lecturer when assessing writing tasks is further compounded by the education context, the worldview of the educator and the experience of the learner. Common issues confronting engineering educators and students emerge. This paper addresses some such issues.","PeriodicalId":122830,"journal":{"name":"AFRICON 2009","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the written word: The engineering students' experience\",\"authors\":\"H. Israel, Henk J. de Jager\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AFRCON.2009.5308073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vygotsky's (1987) premise is that students write to learn, and that this learning stretches across the curriculum. The lecturer in the field of engineering has therefore to evaluate teaching and learning through writing tasks as they are traditionally known, and ask why assessment focuses on students' weaknesses - why does assessment instead not meet the student at his point of strength, and lead him from there? It is at this point that the various factors contributing to the learning experience of the student merge into one multi-faceted concept - assessment. Assessment skills are part of the learning process, yet equipping engineering lecturers with such skills in theory and practice is minimal. Assumptions are that if one is qualified in a content area, one can teach that content and objectively assess one's students. This is not always true. Reviewing assessment of the written word is vital because language is the means to academic success. The responsibility lying with the engineering lecturer when assessing writing tasks is further compounded by the education context, the worldview of the educator and the experience of the learner. Common issues confronting engineering educators and students emerge. This paper addresses some such issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AFRICON 2009\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AFRICON 2009\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRCON.2009.5308073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICON 2009","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRCON.2009.5308073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

维果茨基(1987)的前提是学生写作是为了学习,而这种学习贯穿于整个课程。因此,工程领域的讲师必须通过传统上所知的写作任务来评估教学和学习,并问为什么评估侧重于学生的弱点——为什么评估不能满足学生的长处,并引导他从那里开始?正是在这一点上,促进学生学习经验的各种因素融合成一个多方面的概念-评估。评估技能是学习过程的一部分,然而在理论和实践中为工程讲师提供这样的技能是很少的。假设是,如果一个人在某一内容领域有资格,他就可以教授该内容,并客观地评估他的学生。这并不总是正确的。回顾书面文字的评估是至关重要的,因为语言是学业成功的手段。工程讲师在评估写作任务时的责任因教育背景、教育者的世界观和学习者的经验而进一步复杂化。工程教育工作者和学生面临的共同问题出现了。本文探讨了其中的一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the written word: The engineering students' experience
Vygotsky's (1987) premise is that students write to learn, and that this learning stretches across the curriculum. The lecturer in the field of engineering has therefore to evaluate teaching and learning through writing tasks as they are traditionally known, and ask why assessment focuses on students' weaknesses - why does assessment instead not meet the student at his point of strength, and lead him from there? It is at this point that the various factors contributing to the learning experience of the student merge into one multi-faceted concept - assessment. Assessment skills are part of the learning process, yet equipping engineering lecturers with such skills in theory and practice is minimal. Assumptions are that if one is qualified in a content area, one can teach that content and objectively assess one's students. This is not always true. Reviewing assessment of the written word is vital because language is the means to academic success. The responsibility lying with the engineering lecturer when assessing writing tasks is further compounded by the education context, the worldview of the educator and the experience of the learner. Common issues confronting engineering educators and students emerge. This paper addresses some such issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信