云环境下组密钥协商协议综述

M. Li, Ruijie Zhang, Xiang Du, Min Zhou, Luqi Yan, Jiacheng Song
{"title":"云环境下组密钥协商协议综述","authors":"M. Li, Ruijie Zhang, Xiang Du, Min Zhou, Luqi Yan, Jiacheng Song","doi":"10.1109/IC3.2018.00-38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This survey is aimed at reviewing the group key agreement protocols in cloud environment. These protocols are given a classification, which are group key agreement protocol, triple-party protocol and double-party protocol, according to the number of users participating in the agreement. Then we give a summary of these proposed key agreement protocols based on the classification. After performing analysis on security and performance of these key agreement protocols respectively, a comment on each category is made and given in this paper. Based on which, it is unmistakably that Odelu et al.'s protocol in [47] shows the best performance both in security and efficiency, while Tseng et al.'s protocol in [45] reveals unsatisfying outcome. Finally, discussion and evaluation of group key agreement protocols in cloud is given in a generalized way to provide a reference for further study.","PeriodicalId":236366,"journal":{"name":"2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey on Group Key Agreement Protocols in Cloud Environment\",\"authors\":\"M. Li, Ruijie Zhang, Xiang Du, Min Zhou, Luqi Yan, Jiacheng Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IC3.2018.00-38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This survey is aimed at reviewing the group key agreement protocols in cloud environment. These protocols are given a classification, which are group key agreement protocol, triple-party protocol and double-party protocol, according to the number of users participating in the agreement. Then we give a summary of these proposed key agreement protocols based on the classification. After performing analysis on security and performance of these key agreement protocols respectively, a comment on each category is made and given in this paper. Based on which, it is unmistakably that Odelu et al.'s protocol in [47] shows the best performance both in security and efficiency, while Tseng et al.'s protocol in [45] reveals unsatisfying outcome. Finally, discussion and evaluation of group key agreement protocols in cloud is given in a generalized way to provide a reference for further study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":236366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2018.00-38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 1st International Cognitive Cities Conference (IC3)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2018.00-38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本调查旨在回顾云环境下的组密钥协议。根据参与协议的用户数量,对这些协议进行分类,分别为组密钥协议、三方协议和双方协议。然后对这些基于分类的密钥协议协议进行了总结。本文分别对这些密钥协议的安全性和性能进行了分析,并对每一类密钥协议进行了评述。由此可见,Odelu等人在[47]中的协议无论在安全性还是效率方面都表现出了最好的性能,而Tseng等人在[45]中的协议表现出了不令人满意的结果。最后,对云环境下的组密钥协商协议进行了一般性的讨论和评价,为进一步的研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Survey on Group Key Agreement Protocols in Cloud Environment
This survey is aimed at reviewing the group key agreement protocols in cloud environment. These protocols are given a classification, which are group key agreement protocol, triple-party protocol and double-party protocol, according to the number of users participating in the agreement. Then we give a summary of these proposed key agreement protocols based on the classification. After performing analysis on security and performance of these key agreement protocols respectively, a comment on each category is made and given in this paper. Based on which, it is unmistakably that Odelu et al.'s protocol in [47] shows the best performance both in security and efficiency, while Tseng et al.'s protocol in [45] reveals unsatisfying outcome. Finally, discussion and evaluation of group key agreement protocols in cloud is given in a generalized way to provide a reference for further study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信