社会法律研究中的定量方法:方法论临床工作手册-牛津大学CSLS

Michelle B. Cowley-Cunningham
{"title":"社会法律研究中的定量方法:方法论临床工作手册-牛津大学CSLS","authors":"Michelle B. Cowley-Cunningham","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2407141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What do we mean by the quantitative-qualitative research process in contemporary socio-legal empirical research? When we conduct research using experimental designs, engage with survey data, or build secondary data sets, there are often questions unanswered by quantitative data only. New research questions need to be derived, often requiring both new quantification hypotheses, or further examinations of the original measures of quantification. In particular must we always qualitatively validate the quantitative measures originally taken in legal empirical research, given that participants are qualitative end-users of the law, and given that the quantification of the law must be always qualitatively comprehensible? This seminar paper proposes that quantitative measures of the research participant's own words in legal research can tell us something new about the accuracy of the correspondence between the participant's actual reasoning on quantitative measures, to provide a measure of validation, or indeed provide a measure of accuracy assessment for an original research question, given a known theory and accepted data in a field. Given that the nature of quantification in law tends to qualify quantitative concepts in linguistic terms only, the qualitative-quantitative method may be a particularly important component to quantitative data collection in socio-legal studies. To this end this seminar paper will provide a framework for analysing these qualitative components of research participant's protocols in legal empirical research by taking an introductory tour through quantitative methodology and providing demonstrative examples. Recorded utterances and dialogue, recorded both during the research task, and retrospectively for qualitative-quantitative validation of quantification will be explicated as a workbook method for the following practical discussions: Experimental design-manipulation; Quasi-experimental design; Cross-sectional design; Longitudinal design; and Case study design.","PeriodicalId":205918,"journal":{"name":"Law Educator: Courses","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Methods in Socio-Legal Studies: A Methodology Clinic Workbook - CSLS, University of Oxford\",\"authors\":\"Michelle B. Cowley-Cunningham\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2407141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What do we mean by the quantitative-qualitative research process in contemporary socio-legal empirical research? When we conduct research using experimental designs, engage with survey data, or build secondary data sets, there are often questions unanswered by quantitative data only. New research questions need to be derived, often requiring both new quantification hypotheses, or further examinations of the original measures of quantification. In particular must we always qualitatively validate the quantitative measures originally taken in legal empirical research, given that participants are qualitative end-users of the law, and given that the quantification of the law must be always qualitatively comprehensible? This seminar paper proposes that quantitative measures of the research participant's own words in legal research can tell us something new about the accuracy of the correspondence between the participant's actual reasoning on quantitative measures, to provide a measure of validation, or indeed provide a measure of accuracy assessment for an original research question, given a known theory and accepted data in a field. Given that the nature of quantification in law tends to qualify quantitative concepts in linguistic terms only, the qualitative-quantitative method may be a particularly important component to quantitative data collection in socio-legal studies. To this end this seminar paper will provide a framework for analysing these qualitative components of research participant's protocols in legal empirical research by taking an introductory tour through quantitative methodology and providing demonstrative examples. Recorded utterances and dialogue, recorded both during the research task, and retrospectively for qualitative-quantitative validation of quantification will be explicated as a workbook method for the following practical discussions: Experimental design-manipulation; Quasi-experimental design; Cross-sectional design; Longitudinal design; and Case study design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205918,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law Educator: Courses\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law Educator: Courses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2407141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Educator: Courses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2407141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当代社会法律实证研究中的定量-定性研究过程是什么意思?当我们使用实验设计、调查数据或建立辅助数据集进行研究时,通常只有定量数据无法回答问题。需要提出新的研究问题,通常既需要新的量化假设,又需要对原有的量化方法进行进一步的检验。特别是,考虑到参与者是法律的定性最终用户,并且考虑到法律的量化必须始终在定性上可理解,我们是否必须始终在定性上验证最初在法律实证研究中采取的定量措施?这篇研讨会论文提出,研究参与者在法律研究中自己的话语的定量测量可以告诉我们一些关于参与者在定量测量上的实际推理之间对应的准确性的新东西,以提供一种验证的措施,或者确实为原始研究问题提供一种准确性评估的措施,给定一个已知的理论和公认的数据在一个领域。鉴于法律中量化的本质倾向于仅用语言术语限定定量概念,定性-定量方法可能是社会法律研究中定量数据收集的一个特别重要的组成部分。为此目的,本研讨会文件将提供一个框架,通过介绍定量方法和提供示范例子,分析研究参与者在法律实证研究中的协议的这些定性组成部分。记录的话语和对话,记录在研究任务期间,以及回顾性的定量定性验证将被解释为以下实际讨论的工作簿方法:实验设计-操作;准实验设计;横断面设计;纵向设计;案例研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative Methods in Socio-Legal Studies: A Methodology Clinic Workbook - CSLS, University of Oxford
What do we mean by the quantitative-qualitative research process in contemporary socio-legal empirical research? When we conduct research using experimental designs, engage with survey data, or build secondary data sets, there are often questions unanswered by quantitative data only. New research questions need to be derived, often requiring both new quantification hypotheses, or further examinations of the original measures of quantification. In particular must we always qualitatively validate the quantitative measures originally taken in legal empirical research, given that participants are qualitative end-users of the law, and given that the quantification of the law must be always qualitatively comprehensible? This seminar paper proposes that quantitative measures of the research participant's own words in legal research can tell us something new about the accuracy of the correspondence between the participant's actual reasoning on quantitative measures, to provide a measure of validation, or indeed provide a measure of accuracy assessment for an original research question, given a known theory and accepted data in a field. Given that the nature of quantification in law tends to qualify quantitative concepts in linguistic terms only, the qualitative-quantitative method may be a particularly important component to quantitative data collection in socio-legal studies. To this end this seminar paper will provide a framework for analysing these qualitative components of research participant's protocols in legal empirical research by taking an introductory tour through quantitative methodology and providing demonstrative examples. Recorded utterances and dialogue, recorded both during the research task, and retrospectively for qualitative-quantitative validation of quantification will be explicated as a workbook method for the following practical discussions: Experimental design-manipulation; Quasi-experimental design; Cross-sectional design; Longitudinal design; and Case study design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信