阿兹哈尔人穆罕默德迪亚:穆罕默德迪亚身份的矛盾心理与重新诠释

Fahmi Wira Angkasa
{"title":"阿兹哈尔人穆罕默德迪亚:穆罕默德迪亚身份的矛盾心理与重新诠释","authors":"Fahmi Wira Angkasa","doi":"10.32678/alqalam.v39i2.7824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existence of Al-Azhar in Cairo has produced many alumni who carry the message of wasatiyah Islam to all elements of society, including the Muhammadiyah muslim organization. Muhammadiyah as a reformist Islamic institution is often claimed has similarity with Salafi. Then Muhammadiyah is considered to have a different manhaj from Al-Azhar, which in terms of teaching curriculum and movement has many conflicts with Salafi. This fact makes Muhammadiyah cadres who study at Al-Azhar experience ambivalence of identity. This study analyses how Azharite Muhammadiyah's role in the contribution of thoughts against Salafi who still have influence in Muhammadiyah's proselytization movement. This paper uses qualitative methodology, by interviewing some Muhammadiyah cadres, alumni of Al-Azhar who are affiliated with Muhammadiyah. In addition, I conducted digital observations to find data on disputes and debates that occurred between the Muhammadiyah Salafi (Musa) and those who were resistant to their thoughts. I also observe the movements that have been carried out by Azharite Muhammadiyah in fighting for the identity of Muhammadiyah, that Muhammadiyah should not be identified as Salafi. I found that Azharite has been success to campaign that Muhammadiyah is different with Salafi. Lack understanding of members to the Muhammadiyah doctrine is the main factor of the Salafism doctrine development among Muhammadiyah. This paper is expected to reevaluating the Muhammadiyah fatwa which is applied in Muhammadiyah mosques and madrasa, and to put HPT as the primary reference of teaching.","PeriodicalId":274520,"journal":{"name":"Al Qalam","volume":"65 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Azharite Muhammadiyah: Ambivalence and Reinterpretation of Muhammadiyah Identity\",\"authors\":\"Fahmi Wira Angkasa\",\"doi\":\"10.32678/alqalam.v39i2.7824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The existence of Al-Azhar in Cairo has produced many alumni who carry the message of wasatiyah Islam to all elements of society, including the Muhammadiyah muslim organization. Muhammadiyah as a reformist Islamic institution is often claimed has similarity with Salafi. Then Muhammadiyah is considered to have a different manhaj from Al-Azhar, which in terms of teaching curriculum and movement has many conflicts with Salafi. This fact makes Muhammadiyah cadres who study at Al-Azhar experience ambivalence of identity. This study analyses how Azharite Muhammadiyah's role in the contribution of thoughts against Salafi who still have influence in Muhammadiyah's proselytization movement. This paper uses qualitative methodology, by interviewing some Muhammadiyah cadres, alumni of Al-Azhar who are affiliated with Muhammadiyah. In addition, I conducted digital observations to find data on disputes and debates that occurred between the Muhammadiyah Salafi (Musa) and those who were resistant to their thoughts. I also observe the movements that have been carried out by Azharite Muhammadiyah in fighting for the identity of Muhammadiyah, that Muhammadiyah should not be identified as Salafi. I found that Azharite has been success to campaign that Muhammadiyah is different with Salafi. Lack understanding of members to the Muhammadiyah doctrine is the main factor of the Salafism doctrine development among Muhammadiyah. This paper is expected to reevaluating the Muhammadiyah fatwa which is applied in Muhammadiyah mosques and madrasa, and to put HPT as the primary reference of teaching.\",\"PeriodicalId\":274520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al Qalam\",\"volume\":\"65 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al Qalam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v39i2.7824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Qalam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v39i2.7824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

爱资哈尔在开罗的存在产生了许多校友,他们将wasatiyah Islam的信息传递给社会各阶层,包括Muhammadiyah穆斯林组织。作为一个改革派的伊斯兰机构,穆罕默迪亚经常被认为与萨拉菲有相似之处。穆罕默迪亚被认为与爱资哈尔有不同的朝觐,就教学课程和运动而言,爱资哈尔与萨拉菲有许多冲突。这一事实使得在爱资哈尔学习的穆罕默迪亚干部经历了身份的矛盾心理。本研究分析阿兹哈尔派穆罕默德派在反对萨拉菲派思想的贡献中所扮演的角色,萨拉菲派在穆罕默德派的传教运动中仍有影响力。本文采用定性方法,通过采访一些穆罕默德迪亚干部,爱资哈尔校友谁隶属于穆罕默德迪亚。此外,我还进行了数字观察,以寻找穆罕默德·萨拉菲派(Musa)与那些抵制他们思想的人之间发生的争端和辩论的数据。我也注意到阿兹哈尔派穆罕默德派为争取穆罕默德派身份而进行的运动,穆罕默德派不应被认定为萨拉菲派。我发现爱资哈尔人成功地宣传了穆罕默德派与萨拉菲派的不同。成员对默罕默德教义缺乏了解是导致萨拉菲主义教义在默罕默德信徒中发展的主要因素。本文旨在重新评价穆罕默德教法特瓦在穆罕默德教清真寺和伊斯兰学校的应用,并将HPT作为教学的主要参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Azharite Muhammadiyah: Ambivalence and Reinterpretation of Muhammadiyah Identity
The existence of Al-Azhar in Cairo has produced many alumni who carry the message of wasatiyah Islam to all elements of society, including the Muhammadiyah muslim organization. Muhammadiyah as a reformist Islamic institution is often claimed has similarity with Salafi. Then Muhammadiyah is considered to have a different manhaj from Al-Azhar, which in terms of teaching curriculum and movement has many conflicts with Salafi. This fact makes Muhammadiyah cadres who study at Al-Azhar experience ambivalence of identity. This study analyses how Azharite Muhammadiyah's role in the contribution of thoughts against Salafi who still have influence in Muhammadiyah's proselytization movement. This paper uses qualitative methodology, by interviewing some Muhammadiyah cadres, alumni of Al-Azhar who are affiliated with Muhammadiyah. In addition, I conducted digital observations to find data on disputes and debates that occurred between the Muhammadiyah Salafi (Musa) and those who were resistant to their thoughts. I also observe the movements that have been carried out by Azharite Muhammadiyah in fighting for the identity of Muhammadiyah, that Muhammadiyah should not be identified as Salafi. I found that Azharite has been success to campaign that Muhammadiyah is different with Salafi. Lack understanding of members to the Muhammadiyah doctrine is the main factor of the Salafism doctrine development among Muhammadiyah. This paper is expected to reevaluating the Muhammadiyah fatwa which is applied in Muhammadiyah mosques and madrasa, and to put HPT as the primary reference of teaching.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信