{"title":"巴基斯坦残疾评估WHODAS 2.0的生态学验证","authors":"Afaf Manzoor, A. Hameed, H. Munir","doi":"10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-ii).32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disability is a complicated term to define, especially in a country like Pakistan, where the definition of disability is still debatable. The existing service delivery models, including disability assessment, are based on the medical model. The objective of the study was to use the standardized instrument WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-2.0) and establish its ecological validity for disability assessment in Pakistan. Data was collected from 371 out-of-school children with disabilities from three districts of Punjab by using the purposive sampling technique. An innovative method was used to establish ecological validity by taking 45 randomly selected cases among samples, and these cases were presented to a panel of nine experts/raters. The findings of the study concluded a correlation between raters' total score and total sample score, which was found positively strong and significant as r = .819, p = < .001, and it indicated that the use of the WHODAS 2.0 version is ecologically fit forthe use of disability assessment.","PeriodicalId":129253,"journal":{"name":"Global Educational Studies Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecological Validation of WHODAS 2.0 for Disability Assessment in Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Afaf Manzoor, A. Hameed, H. Munir\",\"doi\":\"10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-ii).32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Disability is a complicated term to define, especially in a country like Pakistan, where the definition of disability is still debatable. The existing service delivery models, including disability assessment, are based on the medical model. The objective of the study was to use the standardized instrument WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-2.0) and establish its ecological validity for disability assessment in Pakistan. Data was collected from 371 out-of-school children with disabilities from three districts of Punjab by using the purposive sampling technique. An innovative method was used to establish ecological validity by taking 45 randomly selected cases among samples, and these cases were presented to a panel of nine experts/raters. The findings of the study concluded a correlation between raters' total score and total sample score, which was found positively strong and significant as r = .819, p = < .001, and it indicated that the use of the WHODAS 2.0 version is ecologically fit forthe use of disability assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Educational Studies Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Educational Studies Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-ii).32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Educational Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-ii).32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
残疾是一个复杂的术语,尤其是在巴基斯坦这样的国家,残疾的定义仍然存在争议。现有的服务提供模式,包括残疾评估,是以医疗模式为基础的。本研究的目的是使用标准化的世卫组织残疾评估表(WHODAS-2.0),并建立其在巴基斯坦残疾评估中的生态效度。采用目的抽样技术,从旁遮普三个县的371名失学残疾儿童中收集数据。采用一种创新的方法,从样本中随机抽取45个案例,并将这些案例提交给由9名专家/评分者组成的小组,以建立生态效度。研究结果表明,评分者总分与样本总分存在显著正相关(r = .819, p = < .001),表明使用WHODAS 2.0版本在生态上适合于残障评估。
Ecological Validation of WHODAS 2.0 for Disability Assessment in Pakistan
Disability is a complicated term to define, especially in a country like Pakistan, where the definition of disability is still debatable. The existing service delivery models, including disability assessment, are based on the medical model. The objective of the study was to use the standardized instrument WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-2.0) and establish its ecological validity for disability assessment in Pakistan. Data was collected from 371 out-of-school children with disabilities from three districts of Punjab by using the purposive sampling technique. An innovative method was used to establish ecological validity by taking 45 randomly selected cases among samples, and these cases were presented to a panel of nine experts/raters. The findings of the study concluded a correlation between raters' total score and total sample score, which was found positively strong and significant as r = .819, p = < .001, and it indicated that the use of the WHODAS 2.0 version is ecologically fit forthe use of disability assessment.