{"title":"使用高频评估来估计歧视:来自抵押贷款官员的证据","authors":"M. Giacoletti, Rawley Z. Heimer, Edison G. Yu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3795547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop tests for discrimination that we apply to 25 years of mortgage lending. Our tests limit the scope for omitted variables in a conventional benchmarking test by combining high-frequency mortgage evaluations with the notion that economic incentives can mitigate subjective biases. Loan officers have monthly volume quotas that constrain their subjectivity on loans processed at month-end. Concurrently, applicant characteristics are time-invariant within-month. We estimate that loan officers’ subjectivity contributes to at least half of the unexplained Black approval gap. The within-month approval gap is smaller for shadow banks, but not for FinTech lenders or banks in concentrated markets.","PeriodicalId":405839,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Codes of Conduct (Topic)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using High-Frequency Evaluations to Estimate Discrimination: Evidence from Mortgage Loan Officers\",\"authors\":\"M. Giacoletti, Rawley Z. Heimer, Edison G. Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3795547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We develop tests for discrimination that we apply to 25 years of mortgage lending. Our tests limit the scope for omitted variables in a conventional benchmarking test by combining high-frequency mortgage evaluations with the notion that economic incentives can mitigate subjective biases. Loan officers have monthly volume quotas that constrain their subjectivity on loans processed at month-end. Concurrently, applicant characteristics are time-invariant within-month. We estimate that loan officers’ subjectivity contributes to at least half of the unexplained Black approval gap. The within-month approval gap is smaller for shadow banks, but not for FinTech lenders or banks in concentrated markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Codes of Conduct (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Codes of Conduct (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3795547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Codes of Conduct (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3795547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using High-Frequency Evaluations to Estimate Discrimination: Evidence from Mortgage Loan Officers
We develop tests for discrimination that we apply to 25 years of mortgage lending. Our tests limit the scope for omitted variables in a conventional benchmarking test by combining high-frequency mortgage evaluations with the notion that economic incentives can mitigate subjective biases. Loan officers have monthly volume quotas that constrain their subjectivity on loans processed at month-end. Concurrently, applicant characteristics are time-invariant within-month. We estimate that loan officers’ subjectivity contributes to at least half of the unexplained Black approval gap. The within-month approval gap is smaller for shadow banks, but not for FinTech lenders or banks in concentrated markets.