Miriam Laclavíková, Tomáš Gábriš
{"title":"Velezrada: Zákon na ochranu ľudovodemokratickej republiky a súdna prax","authors":"Miriam Laclavíková, Tomáš Gábriš","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes the legal regulation of high treason in the Act for the Protection of the People’s Democratic Republic, and the practice of its judicial application. The authors innovatively place the issue in a broader historical, philosophical (ethical, or axiological) and methodological context. They are inclined to conclude that the real traitors were not the tried defendants. The necessity of such an adjustment was in itself questionable at the philosophical and ideological level. Its necessity was manifested rather on a political and power-repressive levels. At the same time, should we consider human life and human dignity as inviolable values, regulation and practice of the period under review were unacceptable.","PeriodicalId":356552,"journal":{"name":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了《保卫法》对叛国罪的法律规定及其司法适用的实践。作者创新性地将这个问题置于更广泛的历史、哲学(伦理或价值论)和方法论背景中。他们倾向于得出这样的结论:真正的叛徒不是被审判的被告。这种调整的必要性本身在哲学和意识形态层面上是值得怀疑的。它的必要性在政治和权力压制层面得到了体现。同时,如果我们认为人的生命和尊严是不可侵犯的价值,那么本报告所述期间的规章和做法是不可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Velezrada: Zákon na ochranu ľudovodemokratickej republiky a súdna prax
The article describes the legal regulation of high treason in the Act for the Protection of the People’s Democratic Republic, and the practice of its judicial application. The authors innovatively place the issue in a broader historical, philosophical (ethical, or axiological) and methodological context. They are inclined to conclude that the real traitors were not the tried defendants. The necessity of such an adjustment was in itself questionable at the philosophical and ideological level. Its necessity was manifested rather on a political and power-repressive levels. At the same time, should we consider human life and human dignity as inviolable values, regulation and practice of the period under review were unacceptable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信