人权基金会和咨询办事处:可持续性和未来展望

L. Fioramonti
{"title":"人权基金会和咨询办事处:可持续性和未来展望","authors":"L. Fioramonti","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2103028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last ten years of apartheid rule, civil society organizations gradually became the privileged partners of the European Community’s support to democratization in South Africa. In order to avoid direct politicization of its activity in the country, the European Commission primarily funded civil society groups, which had broad social goals, through umbrella organizations that acted as intermediaries. The bulk of funds to civil society organizations was administered by the so-called ‘Special Programme for the Victims of Apartheid’ initiated in 1986. Not only was the Community’s programme the largest initiative adopted by a foreign institution in South Africa, but its focus on civil society and human rights (including legal aid to civil society activists) supported the goal of many local actors of using court trials involving apartheid issues as an instrument to broaden the room for democratic action. This Report is based upon an academic research conducted between January and July 2004. This research focused on all community-based advice offices directly funded by the FHR until the end of 2003.","PeriodicalId":210610,"journal":{"name":"Public Sector Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Foundation for Human Rights and Advice Offices: Sustainability and Future Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"L. Fioramonti\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2103028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the last ten years of apartheid rule, civil society organizations gradually became the privileged partners of the European Community’s support to democratization in South Africa. In order to avoid direct politicization of its activity in the country, the European Commission primarily funded civil society groups, which had broad social goals, through umbrella organizations that acted as intermediaries. The bulk of funds to civil society organizations was administered by the so-called ‘Special Programme for the Victims of Apartheid’ initiated in 1986. Not only was the Community’s programme the largest initiative adopted by a foreign institution in South Africa, but its focus on civil society and human rights (including legal aid to civil society activists) supported the goal of many local actors of using court trials involving apartheid issues as an instrument to broaden the room for democratic action. This Report is based upon an academic research conducted between January and July 2004. This research focused on all community-based advice offices directly funded by the FHR until the end of 2003.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Sector Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Sector Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2103028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Sector Strategy & Organizational Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2103028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在种族隔离统治的最后十年期间,民间社会组织逐渐成为欧洲共同体支持南非民主化的特权伙伴。为了避免将其在该国的活动直接政治化,欧洲委员会主要通过充当中间人的伞状组织资助具有广泛社会目标的民间社会团体。给民间社会组织的大部分资金是由1986年发起的所谓“种族隔离受害者特别方案”管理的。共同体的方案不仅是外国机构在南非通过的最大倡议,而且其对民间社会和人权的关注(包括对民间社会积极分子的法律援助)支持了许多当地行动者利用法庭审判涉及种族隔离问题作为扩大民主行动空间的工具的目标。本报告书是以2004年1月至7月间进行的学术调查为基础编写的。这项研究的重点是在2003年底之前由家庭健康局直接资助的所有社区咨询办公室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Foundation for Human Rights and Advice Offices: Sustainability and Future Perspectives
During the last ten years of apartheid rule, civil society organizations gradually became the privileged partners of the European Community’s support to democratization in South Africa. In order to avoid direct politicization of its activity in the country, the European Commission primarily funded civil society groups, which had broad social goals, through umbrella organizations that acted as intermediaries. The bulk of funds to civil society organizations was administered by the so-called ‘Special Programme for the Victims of Apartheid’ initiated in 1986. Not only was the Community’s programme the largest initiative adopted by a foreign institution in South Africa, but its focus on civil society and human rights (including legal aid to civil society activists) supported the goal of many local actors of using court trials involving apartheid issues as an instrument to broaden the room for democratic action. This Report is based upon an academic research conducted between January and July 2004. This research focused on all community-based advice offices directly funded by the FHR until the end of 2003.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信