逆世界潮流而动

The Social Policy Journal Pub Date : 2002-09-01 DOI:10.1300/J185v01n04_03

A. Bar-on

{"title":"逆世界潮流而动","authors":"A. Bar-on","doi":"10.1300/J185v01n04_03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Neo-liberal social and economic schools of thought and changing demographics appear to be leading to a worldwide retreat in the provision of universal social benefits. However, Botswana seems to be taking the opposite route. The article examines the country's major safety net schemes and suggests why her sociocultural and political milieus mitigate against a more selective approach to providing social benefits.","PeriodicalId":437502,"journal":{"name":"The Social Policy Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Going Against World Trends\",\"authors\":\"A. Bar-on\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J185v01n04_03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Neo-liberal social and economic schools of thought and changing demographics appear to be leading to a worldwide retreat in the provision of universal social benefits. However, Botswana seems to be taking the opposite route. The article examines the country's major safety net schemes and suggests why her sociocultural and political milieus mitigate against a more selective approach to providing social benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":437502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Social Policy Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Social Policy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J185v01n04_03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Social Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J185v01n04_03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

新自由主义的社会和经济思想流派和不断变化的人口结构似乎正在导致提供普遍社会福利的全球性退却。然而，博茨瓦纳似乎走的是相反的路线。这篇文章考察了该国的主要安全网计划，并提出了为什么她的社会文化和政治环境不利于更有选择性地提供社会福利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Going Against World Trends

Abstract Neo-liberal social and economic schools of thought and changing demographics appear to be leading to a worldwide retreat in the provision of universal social benefits. However, Botswana seems to be taking the opposite route. The article examines the country's major safety net schemes and suggests why her sociocultural and political milieus mitigate against a more selective approach to providing social benefits.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Social Policy Journal

自引率

0.00%

发文量