20世纪20年代至30年代乌克兰神话意识形态中的古代

O. Halchuk
{"title":"20世纪20年代至30年代乌克兰神话意识形态中的古代","authors":"O. Halchuk","doi":"10.28925/2412-2475.2019.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The artistic «reaction» to post-revolutionary reality with its two discourses, modern and socialist, has predetermined the interpretation of antique mythologemes as ideologues in Ukrainian literature of the 1920s and 1930s. From the point of view of the development of the phenomenon of Ukrainian antiquity, during this period we observe an intensified elaboration of cosmological, existential and aesthetic motives as a meta-language which aimed at constructing of the contraversional images of the new sacralized world, its characteristics and perspectives. The modernist discourse focuses mainly on the triad of «humanism — nationalism — Europeanism». Ideologemes of modernist poets associate with aesthetization, a dominant feature of their program, and revolve around the problem of “the artist (Orpheus, Cassandra, etc.), who lives during the Iron Age”. Neoclassicists and symbolists redirect in their poetry the motif of fatum into a motif of fatum of a totalitarian state, and change the traditional interpretation of the Prometheus-Tyranborian into an image of the degraded Prometheus. Instead, futurists and neo-romantics prefer the mytho-motive (later used by the socialist-realist  discourse as well) of modernity as the battle of the Titans, in which Prometheus becomes the epitome of the rebellious proletariat. The social-realist discourse, while formally distancing itself from the world artistic tradition, implicitly reciprocates it, turning the precedent motives and images into ideologemes; e.g., the motif of titanomachy to characterize the present; new leaders of the state are subconsciously perceived as new Olympians who has conquered the chaos and are build a new Cosmos. In this case, the myth of the Iron Age is interpreted in a positive sense; the image of the enemy — the hydra of counter-revolution — «nourishes» the justification of repression. Accordingly, they cultivate the «hero of the day», the uncompromising Prometheus-Tyranborian or Spartacus, or create a collective image of the «leader of the revolution» as a transformation of the centaur. Thus, antique mythology, reinterpreted in the context of ideological and aesthetic programs of different discourses of Ukrainian literature in the 1920s and 1930s, becomes the basis of different variants of mytho-ideology.","PeriodicalId":120787,"journal":{"name":"LITERARY PROCESS: methodology, names, trends","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANTIQUITY IN UKRAINIAN MYTHO-IDEOLOGY OF 1920S–1930S\",\"authors\":\"O. Halchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.28925/2412-2475.2019.142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The artistic «reaction» to post-revolutionary reality with its two discourses, modern and socialist, has predetermined the interpretation of antique mythologemes as ideologues in Ukrainian literature of the 1920s and 1930s. From the point of view of the development of the phenomenon of Ukrainian antiquity, during this period we observe an intensified elaboration of cosmological, existential and aesthetic motives as a meta-language which aimed at constructing of the contraversional images of the new sacralized world, its characteristics and perspectives. The modernist discourse focuses mainly on the triad of «humanism — nationalism — Europeanism». Ideologemes of modernist poets associate with aesthetization, a dominant feature of their program, and revolve around the problem of “the artist (Orpheus, Cassandra, etc.), who lives during the Iron Age”. Neoclassicists and symbolists redirect in their poetry the motif of fatum into a motif of fatum of a totalitarian state, and change the traditional interpretation of the Prometheus-Tyranborian into an image of the degraded Prometheus. Instead, futurists and neo-romantics prefer the mytho-motive (later used by the socialist-realist  discourse as well) of modernity as the battle of the Titans, in which Prometheus becomes the epitome of the rebellious proletariat. The social-realist discourse, while formally distancing itself from the world artistic tradition, implicitly reciprocates it, turning the precedent motives and images into ideologemes; e.g., the motif of titanomachy to characterize the present; new leaders of the state are subconsciously perceived as new Olympians who has conquered the chaos and are build a new Cosmos. In this case, the myth of the Iron Age is interpreted in a positive sense; the image of the enemy — the hydra of counter-revolution — «nourishes» the justification of repression. Accordingly, they cultivate the «hero of the day», the uncompromising Prometheus-Tyranborian or Spartacus, or create a collective image of the «leader of the revolution» as a transformation of the centaur. Thus, antique mythology, reinterpreted in the context of ideological and aesthetic programs of different discourses of Ukrainian literature in the 1920s and 1930s, becomes the basis of different variants of mytho-ideology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120787,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LITERARY PROCESS: methodology, names, trends\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LITERARY PROCESS: methodology, names, trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2019.142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LITERARY PROCESS: methodology, names, trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2019.142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对后革命现实的艺术“反应”及其两种话语,现代和社会主义,已经预先确定了对20世纪20年代和30年代乌克兰文学中作为意识形态的古代神话的解释。从乌克兰古代现象的发展来看,在这一时期,我们观察到宇宙学,存在主义和美学动机作为一种元语言的强化阐述,旨在构建新的神圣世界的对立形象,其特征和观点。现代主义话语主要集中在“人本主义-民族主义-欧洲主义”的三元关系上。现代主义诗人的意识形态与审美联系在一起,这是他们纲领的一个主要特征,并围绕着“生活在铁器时代的艺术家(俄耳甫斯、卡桑德拉等)”的问题。新古典主义者和象征主义者在他们的诗歌中将命运的母题重新定位为极权国家的命运母题,并将普罗米修斯-暴君的传统解释改变为堕落的普罗米修斯形象。相反,未来主义者和新浪漫主义者更喜欢把现代性的神话动机(后来也被社会主义现实主义话语所使用)作为泰坦之战,普罗米修斯在其中成为反叛无产阶级的缩影。社会现实主义话语在形式上与世界艺术传统拉开距离的同时,又含蓄地回应了世界艺术传统,将先前的动机和意象转化为意识形态;例如,用泰坦莫契的母题来描述现在;国家的新领导人在潜意识里被视为征服了混乱并建立了一个新宇宙的新奥林匹克运动员。在这种情况下,铁器时代的神话被从积极的意义上解释;敌人的形象——反革命的九头蛇——“滋养”了镇压的正当性。因此,他们培养出“当代英雄”,不妥协的普罗米修斯-暴君或斯巴达克斯,或者创造出一个“革命领袖”的集体形象,作为半人马的化身。因此,在20世纪20年代和30年代乌克兰文学的不同话语的意识形态和审美程序的背景下重新解释的古代神话,成为神话意识形态不同变体的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANTIQUITY IN UKRAINIAN MYTHO-IDEOLOGY OF 1920S–1930S
The artistic «reaction» to post-revolutionary reality with its two discourses, modern and socialist, has predetermined the interpretation of antique mythologemes as ideologues in Ukrainian literature of the 1920s and 1930s. From the point of view of the development of the phenomenon of Ukrainian antiquity, during this period we observe an intensified elaboration of cosmological, existential and aesthetic motives as a meta-language which aimed at constructing of the contraversional images of the new sacralized world, its characteristics and perspectives. The modernist discourse focuses mainly on the triad of «humanism — nationalism — Europeanism». Ideologemes of modernist poets associate with aesthetization, a dominant feature of their program, and revolve around the problem of “the artist (Orpheus, Cassandra, etc.), who lives during the Iron Age”. Neoclassicists and symbolists redirect in their poetry the motif of fatum into a motif of fatum of a totalitarian state, and change the traditional interpretation of the Prometheus-Tyranborian into an image of the degraded Prometheus. Instead, futurists and neo-romantics prefer the mytho-motive (later used by the socialist-realist  discourse as well) of modernity as the battle of the Titans, in which Prometheus becomes the epitome of the rebellious proletariat. The social-realist discourse, while formally distancing itself from the world artistic tradition, implicitly reciprocates it, turning the precedent motives and images into ideologemes; e.g., the motif of titanomachy to characterize the present; new leaders of the state are subconsciously perceived as new Olympians who has conquered the chaos and are build a new Cosmos. In this case, the myth of the Iron Age is interpreted in a positive sense; the image of the enemy — the hydra of counter-revolution — «nourishes» the justification of repression. Accordingly, they cultivate the «hero of the day», the uncompromising Prometheus-Tyranborian or Spartacus, or create a collective image of the «leader of the revolution» as a transformation of the centaur. Thus, antique mythology, reinterpreted in the context of ideological and aesthetic programs of different discourses of Ukrainian literature in the 1920s and 1930s, becomes the basis of different variants of mytho-ideology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信