评估财务报表因舞弊而产生重大错报风险的分析程序正规化

Yury Kochinev, E. Antysheva, N. Putintseva
{"title":"评估财务报表因舞弊而产生重大错报风险的分析程序正规化","authors":"Yury Kochinev, E. Antysheva, N. Putintseva","doi":"10.1145/3444465.3444532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During an audit, the risk of possible misstatement in financial statements is assessed with analytical procedures, the input information in which is the values of the audited company's financial indicators selected by the auditor. The purpose of this study was to justify the selection and systematization of analytical procedures for assessing the risk of material misstatement in the audited entity's accounting information. For this purpose, the authors analyzed quantitative methods currently used in practice to assess the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements due to their dishonest preparation. The ratios controlled by the known methods generally include only financial performance indicators of organizations. However, in the case of intentional misrepresentation in the financial statements, the financial indicators may also be intentionally misstated so that the control ratios used to check the integrity of the statements remain within acceptable limits. The identified problems make it necessary to find the most effective ways to assess the risk of deliberate misstatement in financial statements. The development of this process is also facilitated by the well-known fact that audit standards contain only framework requirements for the assessment of material misstatement risk in respect of the audited financial statements, so that the development of the corresponding methodology is left to the discretion of each audit company. In this regard, the authors recommend that analytical risk assessment procedures should involve non-financial indicators as well as the financial ones, since non-financial indicators are difficult to manipulate. The study substantiates the choice of non-financial indicators used in analytical procedures for assessing the risk of fraudulent misstatement in financial statements. A set of control ratios has been developed, including non-financial indicators for organizations involved in different types of activity.","PeriodicalId":249209,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formalization of Analytical Procedures for Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement in Financial Statements due to Fraud\",\"authors\":\"Yury Kochinev, E. Antysheva, N. Putintseva\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3444465.3444532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During an audit, the risk of possible misstatement in financial statements is assessed with analytical procedures, the input information in which is the values of the audited company's financial indicators selected by the auditor. The purpose of this study was to justify the selection and systematization of analytical procedures for assessing the risk of material misstatement in the audited entity's accounting information. For this purpose, the authors analyzed quantitative methods currently used in practice to assess the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements due to their dishonest preparation. The ratios controlled by the known methods generally include only financial performance indicators of organizations. However, in the case of intentional misrepresentation in the financial statements, the financial indicators may also be intentionally misstated so that the control ratios used to check the integrity of the statements remain within acceptable limits. The identified problems make it necessary to find the most effective ways to assess the risk of deliberate misstatement in financial statements. The development of this process is also facilitated by the well-known fact that audit standards contain only framework requirements for the assessment of material misstatement risk in respect of the audited financial statements, so that the development of the corresponding methodology is left to the discretion of each audit company. In this regard, the authors recommend that analytical risk assessment procedures should involve non-financial indicators as well as the financial ones, since non-financial indicators are difficult to manipulate. The study substantiates the choice of non-financial indicators used in analytical procedures for assessing the risk of fraudulent misstatement in financial statements. A set of control ratios has been developed, including non-financial indicators for organizations involved in different types of activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3444465.3444532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3444465.3444532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在审计过程中,通过分析程序评估财务报表中可能错报的风险,输入信息是审计师选择的被审计公司的财务指标的值。本研究的目的是证明选择和系统化分析程序以评估被审计单位会计信息中重大错报风险的合理性。为此,作者分析了目前实践中用于评估财务报表因不诚实编制而产生重大错报风险的定量方法。已知方法控制的比率一般只包括组织的财务绩效指标。但是,在财务报表中故意虚假陈述的情况下,财务指标也可能被故意虚假陈述,以便用于检查报表完整性的控制比率保持在可接受的范围内。已发现的问题使得有必要找到最有效的方法来评估财务报表故意错报的风险。众所周知,审计标准只包含评估被审计财务报表重大错报风险的框架要求,这也促进了这一过程的发展,因此,相应方法的发展留给每个审计公司自行决定。在这方面,作者建议分析性风险评估程序既应包括财务指标,也应包括非财务指标,因为非财务指标难以操纵。该研究证实了在评估财务报表中欺诈性错报风险的分析程序中使用的非财务指标的选择。已经制定了一套控制比率,包括参与不同类型活动的组织的非财务指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formalization of Analytical Procedures for Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement in Financial Statements due to Fraud
During an audit, the risk of possible misstatement in financial statements is assessed with analytical procedures, the input information in which is the values of the audited company's financial indicators selected by the auditor. The purpose of this study was to justify the selection and systematization of analytical procedures for assessing the risk of material misstatement in the audited entity's accounting information. For this purpose, the authors analyzed quantitative methods currently used in practice to assess the risk of material misstatement in the financial statements due to their dishonest preparation. The ratios controlled by the known methods generally include only financial performance indicators of organizations. However, in the case of intentional misrepresentation in the financial statements, the financial indicators may also be intentionally misstated so that the control ratios used to check the integrity of the statements remain within acceptable limits. The identified problems make it necessary to find the most effective ways to assess the risk of deliberate misstatement in financial statements. The development of this process is also facilitated by the well-known fact that audit standards contain only framework requirements for the assessment of material misstatement risk in respect of the audited financial statements, so that the development of the corresponding methodology is left to the discretion of each audit company. In this regard, the authors recommend that analytical risk assessment procedures should involve non-financial indicators as well as the financial ones, since non-financial indicators are difficult to manipulate. The study substantiates the choice of non-financial indicators used in analytical procedures for assessing the risk of fraudulent misstatement in financial statements. A set of control ratios has been developed, including non-financial indicators for organizations involved in different types of activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信