K. Considine
{"title":"Han","authors":"K. Considine","doi":"10.1558/isit.19979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that han should be received as an intercultural anthropology into global theological discourse, provides insight into some of the nuances of this anthropology, and shows the benefits of a thorough engagement with han. It suggests han anthropology be received as “intercultural” as opposed to “cross-cultural” or “trans-cultural.” The article then provides a brief overview of the development of han as a local anthropology of the Korean people and then interprets han using the work of Hwa-Young Chong and the philosophy of Jae-Hoon Lee to focus on han’s various manifestations—original and secondary—as well as won-han, jeong-han, and especially hu-han. It explains han’s ambiguous relationality, its potential for negative and positive transformation of life and society, its evocation of woundedness beyond “trauma,” and its deep connection to religion and ritual. I conclude that han continues to offer a rich and under-utilized resource for articulating Christian soteriologies between global and local that prioritize the “sinned-against.”","PeriodicalId":323507,"journal":{"name":"Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.19979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,汉应该作为一种跨文化人类学被接受到全球神学话语中,提供了对这种人类学的一些细微差别的见解,并展示了与汉彻底接触的好处。它建议将汉族人类学视为“跨文化”,而不是“跨文化”或“跨文化”。然后,本文简要概述了汉作为韩国人的一种地方人类学的发展,然后利用Chong Hwa-Young的著作和Jae-Hoon Lee的哲学来解释汉,重点关注汉的各种表现——原始的和次要的——以及原汉、正汉,尤其是胡汉。它解释了汉的暧昧关系,它对生活和社会的消极和积极转变的潜力,它对超越“创伤”的创伤的唤起,以及它与宗教和仪式的深刻联系。我的结论是,它继续提供了一个丰富而未被充分利用的资源,在全球和地方之间阐明基督教的救赎论,优先考虑“被犯罪”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Han
This article argues that han should be received as an intercultural anthropology into global theological discourse, provides insight into some of the nuances of this anthropology, and shows the benefits of a thorough engagement with han. It suggests han anthropology be received as “intercultural” as opposed to “cross-cultural” or “trans-cultural.” The article then provides a brief overview of the development of han as a local anthropology of the Korean people and then interprets han using the work of Hwa-Young Chong and the philosophy of Jae-Hoon Lee to focus on han’s various manifestations—original and secondary—as well as won-han, jeong-han, and especially hu-han. It explains han’s ambiguous relationality, its potential for negative and positive transformation of life and society, its evocation of woundedness beyond “trauma,” and its deep connection to religion and ritual. I conclude that han continues to offer a rich and under-utilized resource for articulating Christian soteriologies between global and local that prioritize the “sinned-against.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信