表演评价是一种运用参与者想象力的评价方法

Y. Kiritani
{"title":"表演评价是一种运用参与者想象力的评价方法","authors":"Y. Kiritani","doi":"10.11247/JSSDJ.62.3_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study examined a new evaluation method called as acting evaluation. It was a way of forming an ideal attitude of participants toward the task, which required them to imagine and to pretend the practical object person in the real evaluation. In the present study, they were the schoolteachers who would be users of an instruction manual. Twenty-six undergraduate students were divided into 2 groups: the experimental group which adopted acting evaluation and the control group. Both groups read prototypes of the manual, planned a class and answered questionnaires. As a result, 2 groups seemed to do the task similarly. However, the differences between 2 groups were seen in the required time for the task and its understanding. Acting evaluation could be a simple instruction method to make the participants concentrate on their task and be suitable for preliminary research. Difference between acting evaluation and other methods in design and in psychology using imagination was also briefly discussed.","PeriodicalId":383659,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACTING EVALUATION AS AN ASSESSMENT METHOD USING PARTICIPANT'S IMAGINATION\",\"authors\":\"Y. Kiritani\",\"doi\":\"10.11247/JSSDJ.62.3_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study examined a new evaluation method called as acting evaluation. It was a way of forming an ideal attitude of participants toward the task, which required them to imagine and to pretend the practical object person in the real evaluation. In the present study, they were the schoolteachers who would be users of an instruction manual. Twenty-six undergraduate students were divided into 2 groups: the experimental group which adopted acting evaluation and the control group. Both groups read prototypes of the manual, planned a class and answered questionnaires. As a result, 2 groups seemed to do the task similarly. However, the differences between 2 groups were seen in the required time for the task and its understanding. Acting evaluation could be a simple instruction method to make the participants concentrate on their task and be suitable for preliminary research. Difference between acting evaluation and other methods in design and in psychology using imagination was also briefly discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11247/JSSDJ.62.3_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11247/JSSDJ.62.3_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究探讨了一种新的评价方法——作用评价。它是一种形成参与者对任务的理想态度的方式,要求他们在真实的评价中想象和假装实际的对象人。在本研究中,他们是学校教师,他们将是教学手册的使用者。将26名大学生分为两组:采用行为评价的实验组和对照组。两个小组都阅读了手册的原型,计划了一节课,并回答了问卷。结果,两组人完成任务的方式相似。然而,两组之间的差异体现在完成任务所需的时间和对任务的理解上。表演评价可以是一种简单的指导方法,使参与者专注于他们的任务,适合于初步研究。并简要讨论了行为评价与其他设计方法和运用想象的心理学方法的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ACTING EVALUATION AS AN ASSESSMENT METHOD USING PARTICIPANT'S IMAGINATION
The present study examined a new evaluation method called as acting evaluation. It was a way of forming an ideal attitude of participants toward the task, which required them to imagine and to pretend the practical object person in the real evaluation. In the present study, they were the schoolteachers who would be users of an instruction manual. Twenty-six undergraduate students were divided into 2 groups: the experimental group which adopted acting evaluation and the control group. Both groups read prototypes of the manual, planned a class and answered questionnaires. As a result, 2 groups seemed to do the task similarly. However, the differences between 2 groups were seen in the required time for the task and its understanding. Acting evaluation could be a simple instruction method to make the participants concentrate on their task and be suitable for preliminary research. Difference between acting evaluation and other methods in design and in psychology using imagination was also briefly discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信