新浪集团私有化退市的经济后果分析

Min-Lang Yang, Shuyang Chen, Jing-Hua Chen
{"title":"新浪集团私有化退市的经济后果分析","authors":"Min-Lang Yang, Shuyang Chen, Jing-Hua Chen","doi":"10.56397/fms.2023.08.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “man-made” Chinese concept stock crisis triggered by Ruixing and the United States has adopted a series of regulatory politicization measures, which has made the situation of Chinese concept stock companies more difficult in overseas markets, and more and more companies have chosen to privatize and delist. This article takes the privatization and delisting of Sina Group as an example. It first describes the process of its privatization and delisting, and then analyzes the reasons for its choice of privatization and delisting from the aspects of undervaluation, enterprise costs, short-selling institutions and regulatory mechanisms. Cost and tax-saving effects, etc. are analyzed for its economic effect after delisting. Finally, by summarizing the case, it is expected to provide useful help to other privatized and delisted Chinese concept stock companies.","PeriodicalId":310548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Management Science","volume":"742 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Economic Consequences of Sina Group’s Privatization and Delisting\",\"authors\":\"Min-Lang Yang, Shuyang Chen, Jing-Hua Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.56397/fms.2023.08.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The “man-made” Chinese concept stock crisis triggered by Ruixing and the United States has adopted a series of regulatory politicization measures, which has made the situation of Chinese concept stock companies more difficult in overseas markets, and more and more companies have chosen to privatize and delist. This article takes the privatization and delisting of Sina Group as an example. It first describes the process of its privatization and delisting, and then analyzes the reasons for its choice of privatization and delisting from the aspects of undervaluation, enterprise costs, short-selling institutions and regulatory mechanisms. Cost and tax-saving effects, etc. are analyzed for its economic effect after delisting. Finally, by summarizing the case, it is expected to provide useful help to other privatized and delisted Chinese concept stock companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":310548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Management Science\",\"volume\":\"742 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56397/fms.2023.08.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56397/fms.2023.08.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由瑞兴和美国引发的“人为”中概股危机,采取了一系列监管政治化措施,使得中概股公司在海外市场的处境更加艰难,越来越多的公司选择私有化和退市。本文以新浪集团私有化退市为例。首先描述了其私有化退市的过程,然后从估值过低、企业成本、卖空机构和监管机制等方面分析了其选择私有化退市的原因。对其退市后的经济效应进行了成本、节税等方面的分析。最后,通过对案例的总结,期望对其他私有化和退市的中国概念股公司提供有益的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the Economic Consequences of Sina Group’s Privatization and Delisting
The “man-made” Chinese concept stock crisis triggered by Ruixing and the United States has adopted a series of regulatory politicization measures, which has made the situation of Chinese concept stock companies more difficult in overseas markets, and more and more companies have chosen to privatize and delist. This article takes the privatization and delisting of Sina Group as an example. It first describes the process of its privatization and delisting, and then analyzes the reasons for its choice of privatization and delisting from the aspects of undervaluation, enterprise costs, short-selling institutions and regulatory mechanisms. Cost and tax-saving effects, etc. are analyzed for its economic effect after delisting. Finally, by summarizing the case, it is expected to provide useful help to other privatized and delisted Chinese concept stock companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信