对违反欧盟法院判决的行为的财务制裁

W. Hummer
{"title":"对违反欧盟法院判决的行为的财务制裁","authors":"W. Hummer","doi":"10.25364/01.6:2019.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pursuant to Article 260 (2) TFEU, in the event of a Member State’s failure to comply with a judgment which condemns said State, the Court may impose financial penalties (lump sums or penalty payments) calculated in accordance with established criteria. When preparing its proposal for sanctions, the Commission takes into account the gravity and duration of the infringement; the gross domestic product (GDP) of the convicted Member State; and the weighted voting rights allocated to it in the EU Council. However, with the replacement of the existing system of vote-weighing in the Council, the methods for calculating sanctions also required adjusting, that is - for the attainment of a qualified majority - via the so-called \"double majority\", the system called for in Article 3 of the Protocol (No 36) had to be adjusted as per 1 April 2017. As stated by the Court in its judgment of Case C-93/17, the system now takes into account the number of seats allocated to each Member State in the European Parliament, instead of the weighted votes in the Council. Moreover, since its judgment of Case C-304/02 - and contrary to the word \"or\" in Article 260 (2) TFEU - the Court now cumulates the lump sum with the penalty payment.","PeriodicalId":258698,"journal":{"name":"Austrian Law Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finanzielle Sanktionen bei Nichterfüllung von Urteilen des Gerichtshofs der EU\",\"authors\":\"W. Hummer\",\"doi\":\"10.25364/01.6:2019.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pursuant to Article 260 (2) TFEU, in the event of a Member State’s failure to comply with a judgment which condemns said State, the Court may impose financial penalties (lump sums or penalty payments) calculated in accordance with established criteria. When preparing its proposal for sanctions, the Commission takes into account the gravity and duration of the infringement; the gross domestic product (GDP) of the convicted Member State; and the weighted voting rights allocated to it in the EU Council. However, with the replacement of the existing system of vote-weighing in the Council, the methods for calculating sanctions also required adjusting, that is - for the attainment of a qualified majority - via the so-called \\\"double majority\\\", the system called for in Article 3 of the Protocol (No 36) had to be adjusted as per 1 April 2017. As stated by the Court in its judgment of Case C-93/17, the system now takes into account the number of seats allocated to each Member State in the European Parliament, instead of the weighted votes in the Council. Moreover, since its judgment of Case C-304/02 - and contrary to the word \\\"or\\\" in Article 260 (2) TFEU - the Court now cumulates the lump sum with the penalty payment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":258698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austrian Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austrian Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25364/01.6:2019.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austrian Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25364/01.6:2019.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据TFEU第260(2)条,如果一个成员国不遵守谴责该国的判决,法院可以根据既定标准施加经济处罚(一次性付款或罚款)。委员会在拟订其制裁建议时,考虑到侵权行为的严重程度和持续时间;被定罪成员国的国内生产总值(GDP);以及在欧盟理事会分配给它的加权投票权。然而,随着安理会现有的投票加权制度被取代,计算制裁的方法也需要调整,即为了通过所谓的“双重多数”获得特定多数,议定书第3条(第36号)所要求的制度必须自2017年4月1日起进行调整。正如法院在其对C-93/17号案件的判决书中所述,该制度现在考虑的是在欧洲议会中分配给每个成员国的席位数目,而不是理事会中的加权票数。此外,自从对C-304/02号案件作出判决以来- -这违反了《公约》第260条第2款中的“或”一词- -法院现在将整笔款项与罚金一起累加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finanzielle Sanktionen bei Nichterfüllung von Urteilen des Gerichtshofs der EU
Pursuant to Article 260 (2) TFEU, in the event of a Member State’s failure to comply with a judgment which condemns said State, the Court may impose financial penalties (lump sums or penalty payments) calculated in accordance with established criteria. When preparing its proposal for sanctions, the Commission takes into account the gravity and duration of the infringement; the gross domestic product (GDP) of the convicted Member State; and the weighted voting rights allocated to it in the EU Council. However, with the replacement of the existing system of vote-weighing in the Council, the methods for calculating sanctions also required adjusting, that is - for the attainment of a qualified majority - via the so-called "double majority", the system called for in Article 3 of the Protocol (No 36) had to be adjusted as per 1 April 2017. As stated by the Court in its judgment of Case C-93/17, the system now takes into account the number of seats allocated to each Member State in the European Parliament, instead of the weighted votes in the Council. Moreover, since its judgment of Case C-304/02 - and contrary to the word "or" in Article 260 (2) TFEU - the Court now cumulates the lump sum with the penalty payment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信