充分发挥“市场经济主体”原则的作用

ERN: Other European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics (Topic) Pub Date : 2012-06-15 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2084786

A. Sanchez-Graells

{"title":"充分发挥“市场经济主体”原则的作用","authors":"A. Sanchez-Graells","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2084786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent ECJ Judgment in case C-124/10 P Commission v Electricite de France (EDF) has clarified an important point in EU State aid law that bears attention: the ‘private investor’ test is not an exception, but the general test that the Commission must apply. This paper critically appraises the potential implications of such finding.","PeriodicalId":103361,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics (Topic)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing the ‘Market Economy Agent’ Principle to Full Power\",\"authors\":\"A. Sanchez-Graells\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2084786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent ECJ Judgment in case C-124/10 P Commission v Electricite de France (EDF) has clarified an important point in EU State aid law that bears attention: the ‘private investor’ test is not an exception, but the general test that the Commission must apply. This paper critically appraises the potential implications of such finding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2084786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2084786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

最近欧洲法院在C-124/10 P委员会诉法国电力公司(EDF)案中的判决澄清了欧盟国家援助法中值得注意的一个重要观点:“私人投资者”测试不是例外，而是委员会必须适用的一般测试。本文批判性地评价了这一发现的潜在含义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Bringing the ‘Market Economy Agent’ Principle to Full Power

The recent ECJ Judgment in case C-124/10 P Commission v Electricite de France (EDF) has clarified an important point in EU State aid law that bears attention: the ‘private investor’ test is not an exception, but the general test that the Commission must apply. This paper critically appraises the potential implications of such finding.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ERN: Other European Economics: Political Economy & Public Economics (Topic)

自引率

0.00%

发文量