基于键合图模型的不确定故障诊断方法比较:在机电系统中的应用

Y. Lounici, Y. Touati, S. Adjerid
{"title":"基于键合图模型的不确定故障诊断方法比较:在机电系统中的应用","authors":"Y. Lounici, Y. Touati, S. Adjerid","doi":"10.1109/ICAEE47123.2019.9015199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with comparing three methods for robust fault diagnosis that generate their residuals using bond graph model. These methods are the causality inversion method, a sensor data combinations method, and a faults/residuals sensitivity relations method. In addition, both parameter and measurement uncertainties are considered to generate the adaptive residual thresholds. Through simulation on a mechatronic system, the presented methods are studied under sensor and parameter faults. The results of the case study are compared for gaining practical insights about the applicability and performance of these methods. The results show that the faults/residuals sensitivity relations method has a better diagnosis performance as compared to the other methods.","PeriodicalId":197612,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering (ICAEE)","volume":"251 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Bond Graph Model-Based Methods for Fault Diagnosis in the Presence of Uncertainties: Application to Mechatronic System\",\"authors\":\"Y. Lounici, Y. Touati, S. Adjerid\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICAEE47123.2019.9015199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with comparing three methods for robust fault diagnosis that generate their residuals using bond graph model. These methods are the causality inversion method, a sensor data combinations method, and a faults/residuals sensitivity relations method. In addition, both parameter and measurement uncertainties are considered to generate the adaptive residual thresholds. Through simulation on a mechatronic system, the presented methods are studied under sensor and parameter faults. The results of the case study are compared for gaining practical insights about the applicability and performance of these methods. The results show that the faults/residuals sensitivity relations method has a better diagnosis performance as compared to the other methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering (ICAEE)\",\"volume\":\"251 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering (ICAEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAEE47123.2019.9015199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering (ICAEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAEE47123.2019.9015199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

比较了利用键合图模型生成残差的三种鲁棒故障诊断方法。这三种方法分别是因果关系反演法、传感器数据组合法和故障/残差灵敏度关系法。同时考虑了参数不确定性和测量不确定性,产生自适应残差阈值。通过对某机电系统的仿真,对该方法在传感器故障和参数故障情况下进行了研究。通过对案例分析的结果进行比较,获得了对这些方法的适用性和性能的实际见解。结果表明,与其他方法相比,故障/残差灵敏度关系法具有更好的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Bond Graph Model-Based Methods for Fault Diagnosis in the Presence of Uncertainties: Application to Mechatronic System
This paper deals with comparing three methods for robust fault diagnosis that generate their residuals using bond graph model. These methods are the causality inversion method, a sensor data combinations method, and a faults/residuals sensitivity relations method. In addition, both parameter and measurement uncertainties are considered to generate the adaptive residual thresholds. Through simulation on a mechatronic system, the presented methods are studied under sensor and parameter faults. The results of the case study are compared for gaining practical insights about the applicability and performance of these methods. The results show that the faults/residuals sensitivity relations method has a better diagnosis performance as compared to the other methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信