拉法兹和马娜在行的:伊本QutaybaâÂÂ(D.276/889)诗歌类型论述

B. MuritalaAlhaji, A. MarufSuraqat
{"title":"拉法兹和马娜在行的:伊本QutaybaâÂÂ(D.276/889)诗歌类型论述","authors":"B. MuritalaAlhaji, A. MarufSuraqat","doi":"10.4172/2151-6200.1000237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abu Muhammad ‘Abd Allah b. Muslim al-Dinawari al-Kufi also known as Ibn Qutayba (d.276/889) was the first literary critic who made a rigid distinction between lafA¼ and ma’nA. Being both a theologian and a man of letters, he never tried to put one above the other. At least, no explicit statement indicates his preference of lafA¼ over ma’nA or vice versa. His analysis is very interesting in terms of its division and classification. However, his conclusions have opened him to many attacks, especially by modern critics, as will be discussed later in this paper. This research paper is going to discuss extensively on the foregoing issues and also elaborate more on some connected analysis on word and content (lafz and ma‘na) in Arabic literary critical circle.","PeriodicalId":161420,"journal":{"name":"Arts and social sciences journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lafz and Ma Na in the Line: Ibn QutaybaâÂÂ(D.276/889) Exposition ofTypes of Poetry\",\"authors\":\"B. MuritalaAlhaji, A. MarufSuraqat\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2151-6200.1000237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abu Muhammad ‘Abd Allah b. Muslim al-Dinawari al-Kufi also known as Ibn Qutayba (d.276/889) was the first literary critic who made a rigid distinction between lafA¼ and ma’nA. Being both a theologian and a man of letters, he never tried to put one above the other. At least, no explicit statement indicates his preference of lafA¼ over ma’nA or vice versa. His analysis is very interesting in terms of its division and classification. However, his conclusions have opened him to many attacks, especially by modern critics, as will be discussed later in this paper. This research paper is going to discuss extensively on the foregoing issues and also elaborate more on some connected analysis on word and content (lafz and ma‘na) in Arabic literary critical circle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arts and social sciences journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arts and social sciences journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2151-6200.1000237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts and social sciences journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2151-6200.1000237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

阿布·穆罕默德·阿布德·安拉,即穆斯林al-Dinawari al-Kufi,也被称为Ibn Qutayba(公元276/889年),是第一位严格区分lafA¼和ma ' na '的文学评论家。作为一个神学家和一个文学家,他从来没有试图把一个放在另一个之上。至少,没有明确的声明表明他更喜欢拉法乌斯而不是马纳乌斯,反之亦然。他的分析在划分和分类方面非常有趣。然而,他的结论使他受到许多攻击,特别是来自现代评论家的攻击,这将在本文后面讨论。本研究论文将对上述问题进行广泛的讨论,并进一步阐述阿拉伯文学批评界对词语和内容(lafz和ma 'na)的一些相关分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lafz and Ma Na in the Line: Ibn QutaybaâÂÂ(D.276/889) Exposition ofTypes of Poetry
Abu Muhammad ‘Abd Allah b. Muslim al-Dinawari al-Kufi also known as Ibn Qutayba (d.276/889) was the first literary critic who made a rigid distinction between lafA¼ and ma’nA. Being both a theologian and a man of letters, he never tried to put one above the other. At least, no explicit statement indicates his preference of lafA¼ over ma’nA or vice versa. His analysis is very interesting in terms of its division and classification. However, his conclusions have opened him to many attacks, especially by modern critics, as will be discussed later in this paper. This research paper is going to discuss extensively on the foregoing issues and also elaborate more on some connected analysis on word and content (lafz and ma‘na) in Arabic literary critical circle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信