真实学习方法和评价技术对学生统计基础测验成绩的影响

Isak Iskandar, Ahmad Ahmad
{"title":"真实学习方法和评价技术对学生统计基础测验成绩的影响","authors":"Isak Iskandar, Ahmad Ahmad","doi":"10.21009/jisae.v8i2.28936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of authentic learning approaches and assessment techniques on students' basic statistical learning outcomes by controlling intelligence. This research is a quasi-experimental research using a 2x2 factorial design which includes 80 samples of KPI students. The results are (1) the results of the basic statistical basic test of students who use a scientific approach are higher than students who use a contextual learning approach (2) the results of the basic statistical test of students who use essay tests are higher than students who use portfolio assessment (3) there are the effect of the interaction between the learning approach and authentic assessment techniques on the results of the basic statistical basic test of students (4) especially for students who learn to use essay assessment, the results of the basic statistical test of student groups with a scientific approach are higher than contextual learning (5) especially for students who learn to use portfolio assessment, the results of the basic statistical test of student groups with a contextual approach are lower than scientific learning (6) especially for students who learn to use a scientific approach, the results of the basic statistical test of student groups with essay assessments are more higher score than using portfolio assessment (7) especially for students who learn to use a contextual approach, the results of the basic statistical test for groups of students with portfolio assessment are lower than using essay assessment. Therefore, it is recommended for lecturers to know the success of students in receiving the material, it is better to use a scientific approach and form of essay assessment.","PeriodicalId":262250,"journal":{"name":"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE EFFECT OF AUTHENTIC LEARNING APPROACHES AND ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES ON STUDENTS' STATISTICS BASIC TEST RESULTS BY INTELLIGENCE CONTROL\",\"authors\":\"Isak Iskandar, Ahmad Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.21009/jisae.v8i2.28936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of authentic learning approaches and assessment techniques on students' basic statistical learning outcomes by controlling intelligence. This research is a quasi-experimental research using a 2x2 factorial design which includes 80 samples of KPI students. The results are (1) the results of the basic statistical basic test of students who use a scientific approach are higher than students who use a contextual learning approach (2) the results of the basic statistical test of students who use essay tests are higher than students who use portfolio assessment (3) there are the effect of the interaction between the learning approach and authentic assessment techniques on the results of the basic statistical basic test of students (4) especially for students who learn to use essay assessment, the results of the basic statistical test of student groups with a scientific approach are higher than contextual learning (5) especially for students who learn to use portfolio assessment, the results of the basic statistical test of student groups with a contextual approach are lower than scientific learning (6) especially for students who learn to use a scientific approach, the results of the basic statistical test of student groups with essay assessments are more higher score than using portfolio assessment (7) especially for students who learn to use a contextual approach, the results of the basic statistical test for groups of students with portfolio assessment are lower than using essay assessment. Therefore, it is recommended for lecturers to know the success of students in receiving the material, it is better to use a scientific approach and form of essay assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v8i2.28936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v8i2.28936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是通过控制智力来确定真实学习方法和评估技术对学生基本统计学习成果的影响。本研究是一个准实验研究,采用2x2因子设计,包括80个KPI学生样本。结果(1)基本统计结果基本测试的学生用科学的方法高于学生使用上下文学习方法(2)的结果基本统计测试的学生使用论文测试高于学生使用项目组合评估的影响(3)之间的交互的学习方法和真实的评估技术的基本统计结果(4)尤其是学生的基本测试学习使用论文评估的学生,使用科学方法的学生群体的基本统计检验结果高于情境学习的学生(5),特别是学习使用档案袋评估的学生,使用情境方法的学生群体的基本统计检验结果低于科学学习的学生(6),特别是学习使用科学方法的学生。使用论文评估的学生组的基本统计检验结果比使用作品集评估的学生组得分更高(7),特别是对于学习使用上下文方法的学生,使用作品集评估的学生组的基本统计检验结果低于使用论文评估的学生组。因此,建议讲师了解学生在接收材料方面的成功情况,最好采用科学的方法和形式进行论文评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE EFFECT OF AUTHENTIC LEARNING APPROACHES AND ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES ON STUDENTS' STATISTICS BASIC TEST RESULTS BY INTELLIGENCE CONTROL
The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of authentic learning approaches and assessment techniques on students' basic statistical learning outcomes by controlling intelligence. This research is a quasi-experimental research using a 2x2 factorial design which includes 80 samples of KPI students. The results are (1) the results of the basic statistical basic test of students who use a scientific approach are higher than students who use a contextual learning approach (2) the results of the basic statistical test of students who use essay tests are higher than students who use portfolio assessment (3) there are the effect of the interaction between the learning approach and authentic assessment techniques on the results of the basic statistical basic test of students (4) especially for students who learn to use essay assessment, the results of the basic statistical test of student groups with a scientific approach are higher than contextual learning (5) especially for students who learn to use portfolio assessment, the results of the basic statistical test of student groups with a contextual approach are lower than scientific learning (6) especially for students who learn to use a scientific approach, the results of the basic statistical test of student groups with essay assessments are more higher score than using portfolio assessment (7) especially for students who learn to use a contextual approach, the results of the basic statistical test for groups of students with portfolio assessment are lower than using essay assessment. Therefore, it is recommended for lecturers to know the success of students in receiving the material, it is better to use a scientific approach and form of essay assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信