A. Wati, Novita Tresa, Apriliah Apriliah, N. Nuraini, Syefriyeni Syefriyeni
{"title":"FEMINISME DALAM PERSPEKTIF ISLAM DAN BARAT","authors":"A. Wati, Novita Tresa, Apriliah Apriliah, N. Nuraini, Syefriyeni Syefriyeni","doi":"10.19109/el-fikr.v3i2.15027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed at investigating Arthur Schopenhauer and Murtadha Muthahhari's perspectives on feminisme. This study employed a qualitative approach. This is a library research in which data were collected from related literatures. Descriptive analytical and historical analytical methods were used to analyze data. The findings of the study showed that perspectives on feminisme between both scholars are different. Arthur Schopenhauer views that feminisme is debatable. Meanwhile, Murtadha Muthahhari emphasized that feminism it is not necessary to debate it because it has been clearly stated in the Holy Quran. This research recommends educational institutions and other social institutions to view feminisme as a path to woman's equality. \nKeywords: Comparison; Feminism; Perspective.","PeriodicalId":130944,"journal":{"name":"EL-FIKR: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EL-FIKR: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19109/el-fikr.v3i2.15027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨叔本华和穆塔达对女性主义的看法。本研究采用定性方法。这是一项图书馆研究,数据收集自相关文献。采用描述性分析和历史分析方法对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,两位学者对女性主义的看法存在差异。亚瑟·叔本华认为女权主义是有争议的。与此同时,Murtadha Muthahhari强调,女权主义没有必要辩论,因为它在神圣的古兰经中有明确的规定。本研究建议教育机构和其他社会机构将女权主义视为实现妇女平等的途径。关键词:比较;女权主义;视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
FEMINISME DALAM PERSPEKTIF ISLAM DAN BARAT
This study aimed at investigating Arthur Schopenhauer and Murtadha Muthahhari's perspectives on feminisme. This study employed a qualitative approach. This is a library research in which data were collected from related literatures. Descriptive analytical and historical analytical methods were used to analyze data. The findings of the study showed that perspectives on feminisme between both scholars are different. Arthur Schopenhauer views that feminisme is debatable. Meanwhile, Murtadha Muthahhari emphasized that feminism it is not necessary to debate it because it has been clearly stated in the Holy Quran. This research recommends educational institutions and other social institutions to view feminisme as a path to woman's equality. Keywords: Comparison; Feminism; Perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信