直接和间接反馈对西班牙语作为外语学生写作能力发展的影响

Ángel Osle
{"title":"直接和间接反馈对西班牙语作为外语学生写作能力发展的影响","authors":"Ángel Osle","doi":"10.37536/linred.2020.xvii.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we compared the effects of direct and indirect corrective feedback on students’ writing productions in a class of Spanish as a foreign language. A total of 24 students, with varied levels of language proficiency in Spanish, participated in this study. Results show that indirect feedback is slightly more effective in the short term, whilst direct feedback seems to facilitate students’ retention in the long term. Furthermore, students’ level of engagement seems to play a major role on the effectiveness of the different types of feedback.","PeriodicalId":371289,"journal":{"name":"Linred - Lingüística en la red","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efectos del feedback directo e indirecto en el desarrollo de la competencia escrita de un grupo de estudiantes de español como lengua extranjera\",\"authors\":\"Ángel Osle\",\"doi\":\"10.37536/linred.2020.xvii.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we compared the effects of direct and indirect corrective feedback on students’ writing productions in a class of Spanish as a foreign language. A total of 24 students, with varied levels of language proficiency in Spanish, participated in this study. Results show that indirect feedback is slightly more effective in the short term, whilst direct feedback seems to facilitate students’ retention in the long term. Furthermore, students’ level of engagement seems to play a major role on the effectiveness of the different types of feedback.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linred - Lingüística en la red\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linred - Lingüística en la red\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37536/linred.2020.xvii.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linred - Lingüística en la red","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37536/linred.2020.xvii.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们比较了直接和间接纠正反馈对学生写作成果的影响。共有24名西班牙语水平不同的学生参与了这项研究。结果表明,间接反馈在短期内更有效,而直接反馈似乎有助于学生的长期记忆。此外,学生的参与程度似乎对不同类型反馈的有效性起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efectos del feedback directo e indirecto en el desarrollo de la competencia escrita de un grupo de estudiantes de español como lengua extranjera
In this study, we compared the effects of direct and indirect corrective feedback on students’ writing productions in a class of Spanish as a foreign language. A total of 24 students, with varied levels of language proficiency in Spanish, participated in this study. Results show that indirect feedback is slightly more effective in the short term, whilst direct feedback seems to facilitate students’ retention in the long term. Furthermore, students’ level of engagement seems to play a major role on the effectiveness of the different types of feedback.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信