Yogia Prihartini, Wahyudi Buska, F. Hakim
{"title":"Mustawâ Layâqah al-Ikhtibār li Mâdah al-Lughah al -‘Arabiyyah","authors":"Yogia Prihartini, Wahyudi Buska, F. Hakim","doi":"10.32332/ijalt.v4i02.5710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe: The types of tests in the final exams of the first semester, the quality of the tests, and the reasons why teachers do not carry out this test analysis. The sample of this study was students majoring in Arabic using purposive sampling using the percentage formula for validity, Cronbach Alpha for reliability, difficulty formula, and differentiation formula. The results of this study were: (1) the forms of the tests were achievement tests (learning objectives), teacher-made tests (writers), summative tests (test time), written tests (implementation), and subjective tests (how-to scores according to point of view. (2) The quality of a test is: (a) The validity of the test is good because it fulfills content validity, although the test items in the first-semester test are based on language structure 41.67% and vocabulary aspects 25% and reading skills 33.35 (b) Reliability of the test was higher at 5.87 (c) The level of difficulty of the very easy test is 0.57%. (d) The differential power test is not good enough by 0.52%. (3) The reason the teacher does not carry out an analytical test is (a) Lack of understanding of problem analysis, (b) They did not experiment in carrying out analytical tests, (c) They did not understand the ins and outs of revaluation, (d) They did not understand problem analysis and, (e) There were teachers who had not received training or seminars in the field of evaluation and analysis.","PeriodicalId":267257,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Arabic Language Teaching","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Arabic Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32332/ijalt.v4i02.5710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在描述:第一学期期末考试的测试类型,测试质量,以及教师不进行此测试的原因分析。本研究的样本为阿拉伯语专业的学生,采用目的性抽样,效度采用百分比公式,信度采用Cronbach Alpha公式,难度公式和微分公式。本研究的结果是:(1)测试的形式有成就测试(学习目标)、教师自编测试(写作者)、总结测试(测试时间)、笔试测试(实施)和主观测试(如何根据观点得分)。(2)测试的质量为:(a)虽然第一学期测试中基于语言结构的测试项目为41.67%,基于词汇方面的测试项目为25%,基于阅读技能的测试项目为33.35,但测试的效度较好,达到了内容效度;(b)测试的信度较高,为5.87;(c)极易测试的难度水平为0.57%。(d)差分功率检验不够好,差0.52%。(3)教师不进行分析性测试的原因是(a)缺乏对问题分析的理解,(b)他们没有进行分析性测试的实验,(c)他们不了解重估的来龙脉络,(d)他们不了解问题分析,(e)有些教师没有接受过评估和分析领域的培训或研讨会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mustawâ Layâqah al-Ikhtibār li Mâdah al-Lughah al -‘Arabiyyah
This study aims to describe: The types of tests in the final exams of the first semester, the quality of the tests, and the reasons why teachers do not carry out this test analysis. The sample of this study was students majoring in Arabic using purposive sampling using the percentage formula for validity, Cronbach Alpha for reliability, difficulty formula, and differentiation formula. The results of this study were: (1) the forms of the tests were achievement tests (learning objectives), teacher-made tests (writers), summative tests (test time), written tests (implementation), and subjective tests (how-to scores according to point of view. (2) The quality of a test is: (a) The validity of the test is good because it fulfills content validity, although the test items in the first-semester test are based on language structure 41.67% and vocabulary aspects 25% and reading skills 33.35 (b) Reliability of the test was higher at 5.87 (c) The level of difficulty of the very easy test is 0.57%. (d) The differential power test is not good enough by 0.52%. (3) The reason the teacher does not carry out an analytical test is (a) Lack of understanding of problem analysis, (b) They did not experiment in carrying out analytical tests, (c) They did not understand the ins and outs of revaluation, (d) They did not understand problem analysis and, (e) There were teachers who had not received training or seminars in the field of evaluation and analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信