H∞与PID控制策略在Boost功率变换器中的性能比较

John Sandoval-Moreno, É. Franco-Mejía
{"title":"H∞与PID控制策略在Boost功率变换器中的性能比较","authors":"John Sandoval-Moreno, É. Franco-Mejía","doi":"10.1109/ANDESCON.2010.5633301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a comparison between a current-programmed PID controller and a mixed — sensitivity H∞ controller applied to a Boost power converter will be discussed. The paper carries out the design of the power converter, according to its power and voltage levels. Then, is discussed the design of both control strategies. For the H∞ controller synthesis is discussed the selection of the weight functions and the implication in the close loop system. For the PID controller, is discussed the PID pole-zero placement that secures the close loop system behavior, according to bandwidth and offset requirements. It was found that although the H∞ controller has some problems with the disturbance rejection from variations of the power source and high increments in the load, the amount of energy required by the controller and the dynamical performance of the output voltage against load or power source variation shows a better performance compared with the cascade PID controller, which uses a current sensor for the strategy that can be avoided with a proper H∞ controller or other loop-shaping based controller design.","PeriodicalId":359559,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE ANDESCON","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison between H∞ and PID control strategies applied to Boost power converters\",\"authors\":\"John Sandoval-Moreno, É. Franco-Mejía\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ANDESCON.2010.5633301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a comparison between a current-programmed PID controller and a mixed — sensitivity H∞ controller applied to a Boost power converter will be discussed. The paper carries out the design of the power converter, according to its power and voltage levels. Then, is discussed the design of both control strategies. For the H∞ controller synthesis is discussed the selection of the weight functions and the implication in the close loop system. For the PID controller, is discussed the PID pole-zero placement that secures the close loop system behavior, according to bandwidth and offset requirements. It was found that although the H∞ controller has some problems with the disturbance rejection from variations of the power source and high increments in the load, the amount of energy required by the controller and the dynamical performance of the output voltage against load or power source variation shows a better performance compared with the cascade PID controller, which uses a current sensor for the strategy that can be avoided with a proper H∞ controller or other loop-shaping based controller design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":359559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE ANDESCON\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE ANDESCON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANDESCON.2010.5633301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE ANDESCON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANDESCON.2010.5633301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文将讨论应用于Boost功率转换器的电流编程PID控制器与混合灵敏度H∞控制器的比较。本文根据电源变换器的功率和电压等级进行了电源变换器的设计。然后,讨论了两种控制策略的设计。对于H∞控制器的综合,讨论了权函数的选择及其在闭环系统中的意义。对于PID控制器,根据带宽和偏移量的要求,讨论了保证闭环系统行为的PID极点-零点位置。研究发现,虽然H∞控制器在抑制电源变化和负载的高增量扰动方面存在一些问题,但与串级PID控制器相比,控制器所需的能量和输出电压对负载或电源变化的动态性能表现出更好的性能。该策略使用电流传感器,可以通过适当的H∞控制器或其他基于环整形的控制器设计来避免。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance comparison between H∞ and PID control strategies applied to Boost power converters
In this paper, a comparison between a current-programmed PID controller and a mixed — sensitivity H∞ controller applied to a Boost power converter will be discussed. The paper carries out the design of the power converter, according to its power and voltage levels. Then, is discussed the design of both control strategies. For the H∞ controller synthesis is discussed the selection of the weight functions and the implication in the close loop system. For the PID controller, is discussed the PID pole-zero placement that secures the close loop system behavior, according to bandwidth and offset requirements. It was found that although the H∞ controller has some problems with the disturbance rejection from variations of the power source and high increments in the load, the amount of energy required by the controller and the dynamical performance of the output voltage against load or power source variation shows a better performance compared with the cascade PID controller, which uses a current sensor for the strategy that can be avoided with a proper H∞ controller or other loop-shaping based controller design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信