焦虑,预期大麻诱导的抗焦虑作用,和大麻消费频率

Paul Guay, M. Mian, Brianna R. Altman, Luna F Ueno, M. Earleywine
{"title":"焦虑,预期大麻诱导的抗焦虑作用,和大麻消费频率","authors":"Paul Guay, M. Mian, Brianna R. Altman, Luna F Ueno, M. Earleywine","doi":"10.26828/cannabis.2021.01.000.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explored relations among anxiety, expectancies for cannabis’s anxiolytic effects, and frequency of use. Undergraduate users (N=242, Mage = 19.1, 64.5% male, 46.6% White, 18.6% African American, 13% Hispanic/Latino, 12.7% Asian, 9.1% Mixed) rated their anxiety on the TSC-40. They reported expectancies for cannabis’s anxiolytic effects using the same TSC items with a rating from -2 (making the symptom worse) to +2 (making the symptom better). Average expectancies were 2.41, suggesting that users expected some impact of cannabis on anxiety symptoms. These expectancies showed a dramatic skew that required transformation. We regressed anxiety and expectancies and their centered interaction term on days of use per month. Expectancies (B=.917) served as a significant predictor, however anxiety did not (B=.215). The interaction term was not significant, (B=.155). These results suggest that users choose the number of days they use based on their expectations of cannabis-induced improvement of anxiety, not on their level of anxiety. The interaction was not an important contributor. These results suggest that alternative approaches for handling anxiety might decrease the frequency of cannabis consumption. In addition, challenging cannabis expectancies about anxiety could also decrease frequency of consumption.","PeriodicalId":383892,"journal":{"name":"Abstracts from the 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Marijuana July 24th, 2020","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anxiety, Expectancies for Cannabis-Induced Anxiolytic Effects, and Frequency of Cannabis Consumption\",\"authors\":\"Paul Guay, M. Mian, Brianna R. Altman, Luna F Ueno, M. Earleywine\",\"doi\":\"10.26828/cannabis.2021.01.000.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explored relations among anxiety, expectancies for cannabis’s anxiolytic effects, and frequency of use. Undergraduate users (N=242, Mage = 19.1, 64.5% male, 46.6% White, 18.6% African American, 13% Hispanic/Latino, 12.7% Asian, 9.1% Mixed) rated their anxiety on the TSC-40. They reported expectancies for cannabis’s anxiolytic effects using the same TSC items with a rating from -2 (making the symptom worse) to +2 (making the symptom better). Average expectancies were 2.41, suggesting that users expected some impact of cannabis on anxiety symptoms. These expectancies showed a dramatic skew that required transformation. We regressed anxiety and expectancies and their centered interaction term on days of use per month. Expectancies (B=.917) served as a significant predictor, however anxiety did not (B=.215). The interaction term was not significant, (B=.155). These results suggest that users choose the number of days they use based on their expectations of cannabis-induced improvement of anxiety, not on their level of anxiety. The interaction was not an important contributor. These results suggest that alternative approaches for handling anxiety might decrease the frequency of cannabis consumption. In addition, challenging cannabis expectancies about anxiety could also decrease frequency of consumption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":383892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abstracts from the 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Marijuana July 24th, 2020\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abstracts from the 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Marijuana July 24th, 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis.2021.01.000.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abstracts from the 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Marijuana July 24th, 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis.2021.01.000.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了焦虑、对大麻抗焦虑作用的预期和使用频率之间的关系。大学生用户(N=242, Mage = 19.1,男性64.5%,白人46.6%,非洲裔18.6%,西班牙裔/拉丁裔13%,亚裔12.7%,混血儿9.1%)在TSC-40上评价他们的焦虑程度。他们用同样的TSC项目报告了大麻抗焦虑作用的预期,评级从-2(使症状加重)到+2(使症状好转)。平均预期值为2.41,表明使用者预期大麻对焦虑症状有一定影响。这些预期显示出需要转变的巨大倾斜。我们回归了焦虑和期望以及它们以每月使用天数为中心的交互期。期望(B=.917)是一个显著的预测因子,而焦虑没有(B=.215)。交互作用项不显著(B=.155)。这些结果表明,使用者选择使用大麻的天数是基于他们对大麻引起的焦虑改善的期望,而不是他们的焦虑水平。这种相互作用并不是一个重要的因素。这些结果表明,处理焦虑的替代方法可能会减少大麻消费的频率。此外,挑战大麻对焦虑的预期也可能减少消费频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anxiety, Expectancies for Cannabis-Induced Anxiolytic Effects, and Frequency of Cannabis Consumption
This study explored relations among anxiety, expectancies for cannabis’s anxiolytic effects, and frequency of use. Undergraduate users (N=242, Mage = 19.1, 64.5% male, 46.6% White, 18.6% African American, 13% Hispanic/Latino, 12.7% Asian, 9.1% Mixed) rated their anxiety on the TSC-40. They reported expectancies for cannabis’s anxiolytic effects using the same TSC items with a rating from -2 (making the symptom worse) to +2 (making the symptom better). Average expectancies were 2.41, suggesting that users expected some impact of cannabis on anxiety symptoms. These expectancies showed a dramatic skew that required transformation. We regressed anxiety and expectancies and their centered interaction term on days of use per month. Expectancies (B=.917) served as a significant predictor, however anxiety did not (B=.215). The interaction term was not significant, (B=.155). These results suggest that users choose the number of days they use based on their expectations of cannabis-induced improvement of anxiety, not on their level of anxiety. The interaction was not an important contributor. These results suggest that alternative approaches for handling anxiety might decrease the frequency of cannabis consumption. In addition, challenging cannabis expectancies about anxiety could also decrease frequency of consumption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信