根据第13.146/2015号法律,精神残疾者的民事能力和监护

Carina Baia Rodrigues, N. Crispino
{"title":"根据第13.146/2015号法律,精神残疾者的民事能力和监护","authors":"Carina Baia Rodrigues, N. Crispino","doi":"10.21708/issn2526-9488.v.3.n5.p68-88.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to expose the differences between the curatela presented in the civil code of 2002, in its original wording, and curatela exposed by the law no 13.146 / 2015, Statute of the Person with Disabilities. It addresses the civil capacity of persons with disabilities in the course of Brazilian Civil Codes, as well as the treatment of such subjects in codification. It reports on the origins of the Disability Statute, revealing part of the doctrinal understanding of curatorship and civil capacity in the way they were treated prior to law 13,146 / 2015. It exposes the decision making supported, innovation of the protective system. The Dialectic method was used, with historical and comparative secondary procedures, since we sought the genesis of the institute of curatela in the Brazilian order, to later carry out the confrontation between the model previously established and that valid from 2016. Finally we arrived to the conclusion that the curatorship, in its new contours, as well as the decision-making supported, provides for the person with mental disability greater autonomy as well as promotes for the same the effectiveness of the principle of the dignity of the human person.","PeriodicalId":416966,"journal":{"name":"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A CAPACIDADE CIVIL E A CURATELA PARA A PESSOA COM DEFICIÊNCIA MENTAL APÓS A LEI Nº13.146/2015\",\"authors\":\"Carina Baia Rodrigues, N. Crispino\",\"doi\":\"10.21708/issn2526-9488.v.3.n5.p68-88.2019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to expose the differences between the curatela presented in the civil code of 2002, in its original wording, and curatela exposed by the law no 13.146 / 2015, Statute of the Person with Disabilities. It addresses the civil capacity of persons with disabilities in the course of Brazilian Civil Codes, as well as the treatment of such subjects in codification. It reports on the origins of the Disability Statute, revealing part of the doctrinal understanding of curatorship and civil capacity in the way they were treated prior to law 13,146 / 2015. It exposes the decision making supported, innovation of the protective system. The Dialectic method was used, with historical and comparative secondary procedures, since we sought the genesis of the institute of curatela in the Brazilian order, to later carry out the confrontation between the model previously established and that valid from 2016. Finally we arrived to the conclusion that the curatorship, in its new contours, as well as the decision-making supported, provides for the person with mental disability greater autonomy as well as promotes for the same the effectiveness of the principle of the dignity of the human person.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21708/issn2526-9488.v.3.n5.p68-88.2019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Jurídica da UFERSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21708/issn2526-9488.v.3.n5.p68-88.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在揭示2002年《民法典》中规定的库拉特拉与第13.146 / 2015号《残疾人法》中规定的库拉特拉之间的差异。它讨论了在巴西民法典过程中残疾人的民事行为能力问题,以及在编纂过程中对这类问题的处理。它报告了《残疾法规》的起源,揭示了在法律13146 / 2015之前,对策展人和民事行为能力的处理方式的部分理论理解。揭示了保护制度的决策支持和创新。由于我们在巴西秩序中寻求库拉特拉研究所的起源,因此使用了辩证法方法,并进行了历史和比较二级程序,随后在先前建立的模型与2016年有效的模型之间进行了对抗。最后,我们得出的结论是,在新的轮廓中,策展人和支持的决策一样,为精神残疾者提供了更大的自主权,并促进了人类尊严原则的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A CAPACIDADE CIVIL E A CURATELA PARA A PESSOA COM DEFICIÊNCIA MENTAL APÓS A LEI Nº13.146/2015
The study aims to expose the differences between the curatela presented in the civil code of 2002, in its original wording, and curatela exposed by the law no 13.146 / 2015, Statute of the Person with Disabilities. It addresses the civil capacity of persons with disabilities in the course of Brazilian Civil Codes, as well as the treatment of such subjects in codification. It reports on the origins of the Disability Statute, revealing part of the doctrinal understanding of curatorship and civil capacity in the way they were treated prior to law 13,146 / 2015. It exposes the decision making supported, innovation of the protective system. The Dialectic method was used, with historical and comparative secondary procedures, since we sought the genesis of the institute of curatela in the Brazilian order, to later carry out the confrontation between the model previously established and that valid from 2016. Finally we arrived to the conclusion that the curatorship, in its new contours, as well as the decision-making supported, provides for the person with mental disability greater autonomy as well as promotes for the same the effectiveness of the principle of the dignity of the human person.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信