巴基斯坦的心理权利与不道德职场行为:地位奋斗、道德脱离、组织认同和自我剥夺的作用

Mehwish Aqeel, D. Siddiqui
{"title":"巴基斯坦的心理权利与不道德职场行为:地位奋斗、道德脱离、组织认同和自我剥夺的作用","authors":"Mehwish Aqeel, D. Siddiqui","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3755245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing research has demonstrated that employees commonly engage in unethical behaviors that are intended to serve the interests of their organization. In this research, we examine the relationship between employee psychological entitlement (PE)- the belief that one should receive desirable treatment irrespective of whether it is deserved- and employee willingness to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). Drawing upon the conceptual framework proposed by Lee et. al. (2019), we included other factors such as Egoistic Deprivation in their modified model. We argue that driven by self-interest and the desire to look good in the eyes of others, highly entitled employees may be more willing to engage in UPB when their personal goals are aligned with those of their organizations. Moreover, we also explored whether this entitlement would also lead to counterproductive work behavior (CWB). We also proposed that entitlement also increase 1. status striving, 2. moral disengagement, and 3. strong identification with the organization. It also causes 4. egoistic deprivation – the sense of unfairly deprived in comparison to other individuals- when their perception of entitlement is not fulfilled. Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey using a close-ended questionnaire. Data was collected from 300 employees and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structured equation modeling. The results suggested that PE has a significant and positive impact on Organizational identification, as well as egoistic deprivation among employees. It also seems to have a direct positive effect on UPB, on the contrary, a significant negative effect on CWB. Moreover, Egoistic deprivation seems to have a negative effect on UPE whereas, Organizational identification seems to have a positive impact. Against expectation, Status striving seems to have a significant negative impact on UPB. Moreover, Moral Disengagement seems to be affecting CWB positively, whereas Organizational identification has a negative effect o it. Organizational identification also seems to be affecting Status striving, Moreover, Organizational identification positively Moderates the effect of Psychological entitlement on Status striving in a way that incases organizational identification, the effect of Psychological entitlement on status striving is pronounced. Hence Organizational identification has a positive, and Egoistic deprivation has negative mediation on the effect of PE on UPB and CWB. Organizational identification also has an indirect mediation on PE UPB nexus through Status striving.","PeriodicalId":117634,"journal":{"name":"Social & Personality Psychology eJournal","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Entitlement and Unethical Workplace Behavior in Pakistan: The Role of Status Striving, Moral Disengagement, Organizational Identification, and Egoistic Deprivation\",\"authors\":\"Mehwish Aqeel, D. Siddiqui\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3755245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Growing research has demonstrated that employees commonly engage in unethical behaviors that are intended to serve the interests of their organization. In this research, we examine the relationship between employee psychological entitlement (PE)- the belief that one should receive desirable treatment irrespective of whether it is deserved- and employee willingness to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). Drawing upon the conceptual framework proposed by Lee et. al. (2019), we included other factors such as Egoistic Deprivation in their modified model. We argue that driven by self-interest and the desire to look good in the eyes of others, highly entitled employees may be more willing to engage in UPB when their personal goals are aligned with those of their organizations. Moreover, we also explored whether this entitlement would also lead to counterproductive work behavior (CWB). We also proposed that entitlement also increase 1. status striving, 2. moral disengagement, and 3. strong identification with the organization. It also causes 4. egoistic deprivation – the sense of unfairly deprived in comparison to other individuals- when their perception of entitlement is not fulfilled. Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey using a close-ended questionnaire. Data was collected from 300 employees and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structured equation modeling. The results suggested that PE has a significant and positive impact on Organizational identification, as well as egoistic deprivation among employees. It also seems to have a direct positive effect on UPB, on the contrary, a significant negative effect on CWB. Moreover, Egoistic deprivation seems to have a negative effect on UPE whereas, Organizational identification seems to have a positive impact. Against expectation, Status striving seems to have a significant negative impact on UPB. Moreover, Moral Disengagement seems to be affecting CWB positively, whereas Organizational identification has a negative effect o it. Organizational identification also seems to be affecting Status striving, Moreover, Organizational identification positively Moderates the effect of Psychological entitlement on Status striving in a way that incases organizational identification, the effect of Psychological entitlement on status striving is pronounced. Hence Organizational identification has a positive, and Egoistic deprivation has negative mediation on the effect of PE on UPB and CWB. Organizational identification also has an indirect mediation on PE UPB nexus through Status striving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social & Personality Psychology eJournal\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social & Personality Psychology eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3755245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social & Personality Psychology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3755245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的研究表明,员工通常会为了组织的利益而从事不道德的行为。在本研究中,我们研究了员工心理权利(PE)-无论是否应得都应该得到理想待遇的信念-与员工从事不道德亲组织行为(UPB)的意愿之间的关系。根据Lee等人(2019)提出的概念框架,我们在修改后的模型中纳入了利己主义剥夺等其他因素。我们认为,在自身利益的驱使下,以及在他人眼中表现良好的愿望的驱使下,当高度授权的员工的个人目标与组织的目标一致时,他们可能更愿意参与UPB。此外,我们还探讨了这种权利是否会导致反生产行为(CWB)。我们还提议增加津贴。2.追求地位;第三,道德脱离。对组织有强烈的认同感。它也会导致4。当他们对权利的感知没有得到满足时,自我剥夺-与其他人相比被不公平剥夺的感觉。实证效度是通过封闭式问卷调查建立的。采用验证性因子分析和结构方程模型对300名员工的数据进行分析。结果表明,体育锻炼对员工的组织认同和自我剥夺有显著的正向影响。它似乎也对常规废物有直接的积极影响,相反,对绕道有显著的负面影响。此外,利己主义剥夺似乎对UPE有负面影响,而组织认同似乎有积极影响。与预期相反,地位斗争似乎对UPB有显著的负面影响。此外,道德脱离似乎对绕道有积极影响,而组织认同对绕道有消极影响。组织认同对地位奋斗也有影响,组织认同正向调节心理权利对地位奋斗的影响,且在组织认同中,心理权利对地位奋斗的影响显著。由此可见,组织认同对企业文化对企业文化的影响具有正向中介作用,而自我剥夺对企业文化对企业文化的影响具有负向中介作用。组织认同也通过地位努力间接中介PE - UPB联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological Entitlement and Unethical Workplace Behavior in Pakistan: The Role of Status Striving, Moral Disengagement, Organizational Identification, and Egoistic Deprivation
Growing research has demonstrated that employees commonly engage in unethical behaviors that are intended to serve the interests of their organization. In this research, we examine the relationship between employee psychological entitlement (PE)- the belief that one should receive desirable treatment irrespective of whether it is deserved- and employee willingness to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB). Drawing upon the conceptual framework proposed by Lee et. al. (2019), we included other factors such as Egoistic Deprivation in their modified model. We argue that driven by self-interest and the desire to look good in the eyes of others, highly entitled employees may be more willing to engage in UPB when their personal goals are aligned with those of their organizations. Moreover, we also explored whether this entitlement would also lead to counterproductive work behavior (CWB). We also proposed that entitlement also increase 1. status striving, 2. moral disengagement, and 3. strong identification with the organization. It also causes 4. egoistic deprivation – the sense of unfairly deprived in comparison to other individuals- when their perception of entitlement is not fulfilled. Empirical validity was established by conducting a survey using a close-ended questionnaire. Data was collected from 300 employees and analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis and structured equation modeling. The results suggested that PE has a significant and positive impact on Organizational identification, as well as egoistic deprivation among employees. It also seems to have a direct positive effect on UPB, on the contrary, a significant negative effect on CWB. Moreover, Egoistic deprivation seems to have a negative effect on UPE whereas, Organizational identification seems to have a positive impact. Against expectation, Status striving seems to have a significant negative impact on UPB. Moreover, Moral Disengagement seems to be affecting CWB positively, whereas Organizational identification has a negative effect o it. Organizational identification also seems to be affecting Status striving, Moreover, Organizational identification positively Moderates the effect of Psychological entitlement on Status striving in a way that incases organizational identification, the effect of Psychological entitlement on status striving is pronounced. Hence Organizational identification has a positive, and Egoistic deprivation has negative mediation on the effect of PE on UPB and CWB. Organizational identification also has an indirect mediation on PE UPB nexus through Status striving.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信