移民法执行中的制度性种族主义

Q3 Social Sciences

Norteamerica Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1016/S1870-3550(13)71782-8

Doris Marie Provine

{"title":"移民法执行中的制度性种族主义","authors":"Doris Marie Provine","doi":"10.1016/S1870-3550(13)71782-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The United States is committed to aggressive efforts to remove unauthorized immigrants while honoring its commitment to race neutrality. Yet immigration enforcement has disproportionately targeted Mexicans and Central Americans. The racial bias can be found at both the federal and local levels, where local police are becoming increasingly involved in locating unauthorized immigrants. The local example featured here is Arizona because of its historical relationship with Mexico and its enthusiasm for immigration enforcement. I find that the current mix of federal and local enforcement discriminates racially through profiling, hyper-surveillance, abusive stops, problematic searches, and unwarranted detention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37648,"journal":{"name":"Norteamerica","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 31-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1870-3550(13)71782-8","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional Racism in Enforcing Immigration Law\",\"authors\":\"Doris Marie Provine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1870-3550(13)71782-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The United States is committed to aggressive efforts to remove unauthorized immigrants while honoring its commitment to race neutrality. Yet immigration enforcement has disproportionately targeted Mexicans and Central Americans. The racial bias can be found at both the federal and local levels, where local police are becoming increasingly involved in locating unauthorized immigrants. The local example featured here is Arizona because of its historical relationship with Mexico and its enthusiasm for immigration enforcement. I find that the current mix of federal and local enforcement discriminates racially through profiling, hyper-surveillance, abusive stops, problematic searches, and unwarranted detention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Norteamerica\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 31-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1870-3550(13)71782-8\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Norteamerica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1870355013717828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norteamerica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1870355013717828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 13

摘要

美国致力于积极消除非法移民，同时履行其种族中立的承诺。然而，移民执法部门不成比例地针对墨西哥人和中美洲人。在联邦和地方两级都可以发现种族偏见，地方警察越来越多地参与寻找非法移民。这里提到的当地例子是亚利桑那州，因为它与墨西哥的历史关系以及它对移民执法的热情。我发现目前的联邦和地方执法机构通过侧写、过度监视、滥用拦截、有问题的搜查和无端拘留等方式存在种族歧视。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Institutional Racism in Enforcing Immigration Law

The United States is committed to aggressive efforts to remove unauthorized immigrants while honoring its commitment to race neutrality. Yet immigration enforcement has disproportionately targeted Mexicans and Central Americans. The racial bias can be found at both the federal and local levels, where local police are becoming increasingly involved in locating unauthorized immigrants. The local example featured here is Arizona because of its historical relationship with Mexico and its enthusiasm for immigration enforcement. I find that the current mix of federal and local enforcement discriminates racially through profiling, hyper-surveillance, abusive stops, problematic searches, and unwarranted detention.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Norteamerica Social Sciences-Cultural Studies

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： Editorial Policies Focus and Scope Section Policies Peer Review Process Open Access Policy Archiving General Criteria Ethical Guidelines Directory Indexing Editorial Bodies Editorial Board International Advisory Board Focus and Scope Norteamérica is a semiannual peer-reviewed journal regarding multi and interdisciplinary academic studies about the North America region (Mexico, United States and Canada) which consider the region itself as an object of study, along with its evolution, its individual processes and internal dynamics. An analysis of the reality of each of the three nations is thematically linked with the rest of the region. 1.- Norteamérica will publish exclusively multi- and interdisciplinary academic studies focused on the North American region (Mexico, the United States and Canada) that: a) address the region as an object of analysis: specifically, its evolution, particular processes, and internal dynamics; b) analyze the reality in each of the three nations, linking them thematically with the rest of the region; c) carry out comparative studies of the nations of North America; d) address the region and its insertion in the international context; and e) expand upon international processes and their impact within the region. 2.- Through these research perspectives, the journal will disseminate articles addressing a wide variety of general and specific issues: a) politics, economics, society and culture; b) foreign policy, trade, political systems, security, comparative politics, political philosophy and history; and c) migration, electoral processes, borders, science and technology, minorities, the environment and natural resources, education, human rights, gender, and others.