私人慈善、学术协会和人文学科:慈善网络中的中心地位、地位和声望

N. Haddad, B. Cantwell
{"title":"私人慈善、学术协会和人文学科:慈善网络中的中心地位、地位和声望","authors":"N. Haddad, B. Cantwell","doi":"10.2979/PHILEDUC.4.2.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Once a cornerstone of the academy, the humanities experienced a decline of student majors and faculty-tenure track line positions, most notably since the Great Recession of 2008. Additionally, academic leaders have turned to philanthropic agencies, scholarly associations, and other umbrella organizations to address academic labor shortages, in many cases, providing temporary positions for recent Ph.D.'s in the form of research fellowships. This case study explores the contributory role of scholarly associations advancing foundation-supported interventions in the humanities, focusing on the American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) during the Great Recession of 2008. We draw on several data collection strategies, including social network analysis to map research fellowship activity and in-depth interviews with institutional leaders, program officers, and grant recipients to assess doctoral student outcomes and organizational practices. Our findings demonstrated that during the economic crisis, fellowships directed toward newly minted Ph.D.s were effective at providing a lifeline for hundreds of early-career humanists, many of whom were able to secure a tenure-track position when the academic labor market improved. Moreover, through such investments, major funders and disciplinary associations supported early career scholars by conferring prestige and sponsoring affiliations across universities that promoted the interchange of ideas, resources, and status. While not providing solutions to structural problems, relatively modest philanthropic investments can propel careers, stimulate scholarly activity, and confer social capital during crisis times.","PeriodicalId":343186,"journal":{"name":"Philanthropy & Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private Philanthropy, Scholarly Associations, and the Humanities: Positions of Centrality, Status, and Prestige in Philanthropic Networks\",\"authors\":\"N. Haddad, B. Cantwell\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/PHILEDUC.4.2.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Once a cornerstone of the academy, the humanities experienced a decline of student majors and faculty-tenure track line positions, most notably since the Great Recession of 2008. Additionally, academic leaders have turned to philanthropic agencies, scholarly associations, and other umbrella organizations to address academic labor shortages, in many cases, providing temporary positions for recent Ph.D.'s in the form of research fellowships. This case study explores the contributory role of scholarly associations advancing foundation-supported interventions in the humanities, focusing on the American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) during the Great Recession of 2008. We draw on several data collection strategies, including social network analysis to map research fellowship activity and in-depth interviews with institutional leaders, program officers, and grant recipients to assess doctoral student outcomes and organizational practices. Our findings demonstrated that during the economic crisis, fellowships directed toward newly minted Ph.D.s were effective at providing a lifeline for hundreds of early-career humanists, many of whom were able to secure a tenure-track position when the academic labor market improved. Moreover, through such investments, major funders and disciplinary associations supported early career scholars by conferring prestige and sponsoring affiliations across universities that promoted the interchange of ideas, resources, and status. While not providing solutions to structural problems, relatively modest philanthropic investments can propel careers, stimulate scholarly activity, and confer social capital during crisis times.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philanthropy & Education\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philanthropy & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/PHILEDUC.4.2.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philanthropy & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/PHILEDUC.4.2.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:人文学科曾经是学院的基石,但自2008年经济大衰退以来,人文学科的学生专业和教师终身职位数量都出现了下降。此外,学术带头人已经转向慈善机构、学术协会和其他伞形组织,以解决学术劳动力短缺问题,在许多情况下,以研究奖学金的形式为刚毕业的博士提供临时职位。本案例研究探讨了学术协会推动基金会支持的人文学科干预的贡献作用,重点关注2008年大衰退期间美国学术学会理事会(ACLS)。我们采用了几种数据收集策略,包括社会网络分析,以绘制研究奖学金活动地图,并与机构领导人、项目官员和资助接受者进行深入访谈,以评估博士生的成果和组织实践。我们的研究结果表明,在经济危机期间,针对新晋博士的奖学金有效地为数百名早期职业人文主义者提供了一条生命线,其中许多人能够在学术劳动力市场改善时获得终身职位。此外,通过这些投资,主要资助者和学科协会通过授予声望和赞助跨大学的附属机构来支持早期职业学者,促进思想、资源和地位的交流。虽然不能为结构性问题提供解决方案,但相对适度的慈善投资可以推动职业发展,刺激学术活动,并在危机时期赋予社会资本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Private Philanthropy, Scholarly Associations, and the Humanities: Positions of Centrality, Status, and Prestige in Philanthropic Networks
Abstract:Once a cornerstone of the academy, the humanities experienced a decline of student majors and faculty-tenure track line positions, most notably since the Great Recession of 2008. Additionally, academic leaders have turned to philanthropic agencies, scholarly associations, and other umbrella organizations to address academic labor shortages, in many cases, providing temporary positions for recent Ph.D.'s in the form of research fellowships. This case study explores the contributory role of scholarly associations advancing foundation-supported interventions in the humanities, focusing on the American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) during the Great Recession of 2008. We draw on several data collection strategies, including social network analysis to map research fellowship activity and in-depth interviews with institutional leaders, program officers, and grant recipients to assess doctoral student outcomes and organizational practices. Our findings demonstrated that during the economic crisis, fellowships directed toward newly minted Ph.D.s were effective at providing a lifeline for hundreds of early-career humanists, many of whom were able to secure a tenure-track position when the academic labor market improved. Moreover, through such investments, major funders and disciplinary associations supported early career scholars by conferring prestige and sponsoring affiliations across universities that promoted the interchange of ideas, resources, and status. While not providing solutions to structural problems, relatively modest philanthropic investments can propel careers, stimulate scholarly activity, and confer social capital during crisis times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信