自由主义的脆弱纽带:战后纽约的养老金、学校和财政互惠主义的瓦解

Michael R. Glass, Michael R. Sean H. Vanatta
{"title":"自由主义的脆弱纽带:战后纽约的养老金、学校和财政互惠主义的瓦解","authors":"Michael R. Glass, Michael R. Sean H. Vanatta","doi":"10.1353/cap.2021.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Between 1940 and 1965, state-level officials changed the relationship between two pillars of the postwar social contract: secure retirement and modern public schools. In the early twentieth-century United States, state pension managers, following an investment regime we call \"fiscal mutualism,\" funneled the savings of government workers into government securities. By purchasing municipal bonds, pension officials lowered the borrowing costs for local governments. We analyze this regime through a close examination of New York State's pension fund. During the 1950s, the comptrollers who managed the New York State Employee Retirement System (NYSERS), the nation's largest state pension, subsidized suburban school construction by purchasing the bond issues of local school districts. But as changes in the financial landscape made this arrangement less viable, New York Comptroller Arthur Levitt Sr. began lobbying for the liberalization of the pension's investment powers. After state lawmakers approved the regulatory changes, Levitt disinvested from municipal bonds in favor of higher-yielding corporate securities. Pension liberalization secured higher returns for state retirees, but it also left school districts to navigate bond markets without the backstop of fiscal mutualism. As school budgets, and the property taxes supporting them, soared to repay the interest costs, tax revolts became a permanent response to the fiscal volatility. These transformations, we argue, stemmed from postwar liberalism's dependence on financial markets to deliver retirement security, public education, and other social benefits.","PeriodicalId":243846,"journal":{"name":"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Frail Bonds of Liberalism: Pensions, Schools, and the Unraveling of Fiscal Mutualism in Postwar New York\",\"authors\":\"Michael R. Glass, Michael R. Sean H. Vanatta\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cap.2021.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Between 1940 and 1965, state-level officials changed the relationship between two pillars of the postwar social contract: secure retirement and modern public schools. In the early twentieth-century United States, state pension managers, following an investment regime we call \\\"fiscal mutualism,\\\" funneled the savings of government workers into government securities. By purchasing municipal bonds, pension officials lowered the borrowing costs for local governments. We analyze this regime through a close examination of New York State's pension fund. During the 1950s, the comptrollers who managed the New York State Employee Retirement System (NYSERS), the nation's largest state pension, subsidized suburban school construction by purchasing the bond issues of local school districts. But as changes in the financial landscape made this arrangement less viable, New York Comptroller Arthur Levitt Sr. began lobbying for the liberalization of the pension's investment powers. After state lawmakers approved the regulatory changes, Levitt disinvested from municipal bonds in favor of higher-yielding corporate securities. Pension liberalization secured higher returns for state retirees, but it also left school districts to navigate bond markets without the backstop of fiscal mutualism. As school budgets, and the property taxes supporting them, soared to repay the interest costs, tax revolts became a permanent response to the fiscal volatility. These transformations, we argue, stemmed from postwar liberalism's dependence on financial markets to deliver retirement security, public education, and other social benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cap.2021.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cap.2021.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:1940年至1965年间,州级官员改变了战后社会契约的两大支柱:保障退休和现代公立学校之间的关系。在20世纪初的美国,各州养老金经理遵循一种我们称之为“财政互惠主义”的投资制度,将政府工作人员的储蓄汇集到政府证券中。通过购买市政债券,养老金官员降低了地方政府的借贷成本。我们通过仔细研究纽约州的养老基金来分析这一制度。在20世纪50年代,管理纽约州雇员退休系统(NYSERS)的审计员通过购买当地学区的债券来补贴郊区学校的建设。纽约州雇员退休系统是美国最大的国家养老金。但随着金融环境的变化,这种安排变得不太可行,纽约主计长老阿瑟·莱维特开始游说,要求放开养老金的投资权力。在州议员批准监管改革后,莱维特从市政债券中撤资,转而投资收益率更高的公司证券。养老金自由化为国家退休人员提供了更高的回报,但也让学区在没有财政互惠主义支持的情况下驾驭债券市场。随着学校预算和支持他们的财产税飙升,以偿还利息成本,税收反抗成为对财政波动的永久回应。我们认为,这些转变源于战后自由主义依赖金融市场来提供退休保障、公共教育和其他社会福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Frail Bonds of Liberalism: Pensions, Schools, and the Unraveling of Fiscal Mutualism in Postwar New York
Abstract:Between 1940 and 1965, state-level officials changed the relationship between two pillars of the postwar social contract: secure retirement and modern public schools. In the early twentieth-century United States, state pension managers, following an investment regime we call "fiscal mutualism," funneled the savings of government workers into government securities. By purchasing municipal bonds, pension officials lowered the borrowing costs for local governments. We analyze this regime through a close examination of New York State's pension fund. During the 1950s, the comptrollers who managed the New York State Employee Retirement System (NYSERS), the nation's largest state pension, subsidized suburban school construction by purchasing the bond issues of local school districts. But as changes in the financial landscape made this arrangement less viable, New York Comptroller Arthur Levitt Sr. began lobbying for the liberalization of the pension's investment powers. After state lawmakers approved the regulatory changes, Levitt disinvested from municipal bonds in favor of higher-yielding corporate securities. Pension liberalization secured higher returns for state retirees, but it also left school districts to navigate bond markets without the backstop of fiscal mutualism. As school budgets, and the property taxes supporting them, soared to repay the interest costs, tax revolts became a permanent response to the fiscal volatility. These transformations, we argue, stemmed from postwar liberalism's dependence on financial markets to deliver retirement security, public education, and other social benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信