夹圈联合组治疗未破裂脑动脉瘤的疗效及并发症:有待克服的问题

Michiyasu Suzuki, H. Sadahiro, S. Kato, H. Ishihara, H. Yoneda, H. Goto, S. Shirao, H. Koizumi, Hiroya Imoto, S. Nomura, M. Fujii, K. Kajiwara
{"title":"夹圈联合组治疗未破裂脑动脉瘤的疗效及并发症:有待克服的问题","authors":"Michiyasu Suzuki, H. Sadahiro, S. Kato, H. Ishihara, H. Yoneda, H. Goto, S. Shirao, H. Koizumi, Hiroya Imoto, S. Nomura, M. Fujii, K. Kajiwara","doi":"10.2335/SCS.39.182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Definite indications for the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysm (uAN) are very difficult to establish because the risk of rupture for any individual aneurysm still cannot be estimated. Furthermore, the criteria for evaluation of the prognosis and potential complications remain unclear, so no risk-benefit analysis can be performed. Recently, prevention of adverse effects to improve patient safety and satisfaction have become more important in the field of neurosurgery. We analyzed the occurrence and nature of adverse effects in 156 consecutive patients treated for uAN in our institute. The patients were treated with endovascular coil embolization for mainly paraclinoid or basilar apex aneurysms in 17 men and 38 women aged 35–81 years (mean 62.1±10.0 years) or surgical clipping for other aneurysms in 23 men and 78 women aged 35–77 years (mean 58.4±9.9 years). Anterior cerebral, anterior communicating, and middle cerebral artery aneurysms were significantly more common in the clipping group, whereas internal carotid and vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms were significantly more common in the coil group. Selection and treatment of uAN by our team showed generally good results in the short term. However, long-term observation to detect such complications as recurrence is required. Serious adverse events occurred in 17 of all 156 patients (10.9%), including mortality in 1 patient (0.6%), major morbidity (less than modified Rankin scale score 2) in 1 patient (0.6%), minor morbidity in 3 patients (1.9%), and transient neurological deficits in 12 patients (7.7%). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the coil and clipping groups, but all events including minor,","PeriodicalId":131030,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Cerebral Stroke","volume":"342 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Result and Complications of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Treated by a Clip-coil Combined Team: Problems to Be Overcome\",\"authors\":\"Michiyasu Suzuki, H. Sadahiro, S. Kato, H. Ishihara, H. Yoneda, H. Goto, S. Shirao, H. Koizumi, Hiroya Imoto, S. Nomura, M. Fujii, K. Kajiwara\",\"doi\":\"10.2335/SCS.39.182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Definite indications for the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysm (uAN) are very difficult to establish because the risk of rupture for any individual aneurysm still cannot be estimated. Furthermore, the criteria for evaluation of the prognosis and potential complications remain unclear, so no risk-benefit analysis can be performed. Recently, prevention of adverse effects to improve patient safety and satisfaction have become more important in the field of neurosurgery. We analyzed the occurrence and nature of adverse effects in 156 consecutive patients treated for uAN in our institute. The patients were treated with endovascular coil embolization for mainly paraclinoid or basilar apex aneurysms in 17 men and 38 women aged 35–81 years (mean 62.1±10.0 years) or surgical clipping for other aneurysms in 23 men and 78 women aged 35–77 years (mean 58.4±9.9 years). Anterior cerebral, anterior communicating, and middle cerebral artery aneurysms were significantly more common in the clipping group, whereas internal carotid and vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms were significantly more common in the coil group. Selection and treatment of uAN by our team showed generally good results in the short term. However, long-term observation to detect such complications as recurrence is required. Serious adverse events occurred in 17 of all 156 patients (10.9%), including mortality in 1 patient (0.6%), major morbidity (less than modified Rankin scale score 2) in 1 patient (0.6%), minor morbidity in 3 patients (1.9%), and transient neurological deficits in 12 patients (7.7%). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the coil and clipping groups, but all events including minor,\",\"PeriodicalId\":131030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery for Cerebral Stroke\",\"volume\":\"342 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery for Cerebral Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2335/SCS.39.182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery for Cerebral Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2335/SCS.39.182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗未破裂性脑动脉瘤(uAN)的确切适应症很难确定,因为任何单个动脉瘤破裂的风险仍然无法估计。此外,评估预后和潜在并发症的标准尚不明确,因此无法进行风险-收益分析。近年来,预防不良反应以提高患者的安全性和满意度在神经外科领域变得越来越重要。我们分析了我院156例连续接受uAN治疗的患者的不良反应的发生和性质。其中,男性17例,女性38例,35 ~ 81岁(平均62.1±10.0岁);其他动脉瘤23例,女性78例,35 ~ 77岁(平均58.4±9.9岁),行血管内栓塞治疗。大脑前动脉、前交通动脉瘤和大脑中动脉动脉瘤在夹持组中更为常见,而颈动脉和椎基底动脉动脉瘤在夹持组中更为常见。我们团队对uAN的选择和治疗在短期内总体效果良好。然而,需要长期观察以发现复发等并发症。156例患者中有17例(10.9%)发生严重不良事件,包括1例死亡(0.6%),1例重度发病(低于改良Rankin量表评分2分)(0.6%),3例轻度发病(1.9%),12例短暂性神经功能缺损(7.7%)。严重不良事件的发生率在线圈组和夹钳组相似,但所有事件包括轻微的,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Result and Complications of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Treated by a Clip-coil Combined Team: Problems to Be Overcome
Definite indications for the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysm (uAN) are very difficult to establish because the risk of rupture for any individual aneurysm still cannot be estimated. Furthermore, the criteria for evaluation of the prognosis and potential complications remain unclear, so no risk-benefit analysis can be performed. Recently, prevention of adverse effects to improve patient safety and satisfaction have become more important in the field of neurosurgery. We analyzed the occurrence and nature of adverse effects in 156 consecutive patients treated for uAN in our institute. The patients were treated with endovascular coil embolization for mainly paraclinoid or basilar apex aneurysms in 17 men and 38 women aged 35–81 years (mean 62.1±10.0 years) or surgical clipping for other aneurysms in 23 men and 78 women aged 35–77 years (mean 58.4±9.9 years). Anterior cerebral, anterior communicating, and middle cerebral artery aneurysms were significantly more common in the clipping group, whereas internal carotid and vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms were significantly more common in the coil group. Selection and treatment of uAN by our team showed generally good results in the short term. However, long-term observation to detect such complications as recurrence is required. Serious adverse events occurred in 17 of all 156 patients (10.9%), including mortality in 1 patient (0.6%), major morbidity (less than modified Rankin scale score 2) in 1 patient (0.6%), minor morbidity in 3 patients (1.9%), and transient neurological deficits in 12 patients (7.7%). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the coil and clipping groups, but all events including minor,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信