资产方差风险与复合期权价格

Hitesh Doshi, Jan Ericsson, Mathieu Fournier, S. Seo
{"title":"资产方差风险与复合期权价格","authors":"Hitesh Doshi, Jan Ericsson, Mathieu Fournier, S. Seo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3885357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluate the empirical validity of the compound option framework. In a model where corporate securities are options on a firm's assets, option contracts on these can be viewed as options on options, or compound options. We estimate a model with priced asset variance risk and find that it jointly explains the level and time variation of both equity index (SPX) and credit index (CDX) option prices well out-of-sample. This suggests that the two options markets are priced consistently, contrary to recent findings. We show that variance risk is important for establishing pricing consistency between equity, credit, and related derivatives.<br>","PeriodicalId":251522,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management & Analysis in Financial Institutions eJournal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asset Variance Risk and Compound Option Prices\",\"authors\":\"Hitesh Doshi, Jan Ericsson, Mathieu Fournier, S. Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3885357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We evaluate the empirical validity of the compound option framework. In a model where corporate securities are options on a firm's assets, option contracts on these can be viewed as options on options, or compound options. We estimate a model with priced asset variance risk and find that it jointly explains the level and time variation of both equity index (SPX) and credit index (CDX) option prices well out-of-sample. This suggests that the two options markets are priced consistently, contrary to recent findings. We show that variance risk is important for establishing pricing consistency between equity, credit, and related derivatives.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":251522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management & Analysis in Financial Institutions eJournal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management & Analysis in Financial Institutions eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3885357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management & Analysis in Financial Institutions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3885357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们评估了复合期权框架的实证有效性。在公司证券是公司资产的期权的模型中,这些资产的期权合约可以被视为期权的期权,或复合期权。我们估计了一个包含定价资产方差风险的模型,发现它可以很好地解释股票指数(SPX)和信贷指数(CDX)期权价格的水平和时间变化。这表明两个期权市场的定价是一致的,这与最近的研究结果相反。我们表明,方差风险对于建立股票、信贷和相关衍生品之间的定价一致性是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asset Variance Risk and Compound Option Prices
We evaluate the empirical validity of the compound option framework. In a model where corporate securities are options on a firm's assets, option contracts on these can be viewed as options on options, or compound options. We estimate a model with priced asset variance risk and find that it jointly explains the level and time variation of both equity index (SPX) and credit index (CDX) option prices well out-of-sample. This suggests that the two options markets are priced consistently, contrary to recent findings. We show that variance risk is important for establishing pricing consistency between equity, credit, and related derivatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信