业务流程模型中的风险分析

V. Gorbunov, Nyan Win Htet, A. Balashov
{"title":"业务流程模型中的风险分析","authors":"V. Gorbunov, Nyan Win Htet, A. Balashov","doi":"10.1109/EICONRUSNW.2016.7448308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two most popular approaches to quantitative risk analysis. The first approach is based on business process simulation used in the @RISK system (Palisade Corporation). The second approach to risk assessment is analytical. The article compares these two methods of risk analysis.","PeriodicalId":262452,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE NW Russia Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Conference (EIConRusNW)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk analysis in the model of the business process\",\"authors\":\"V. Gorbunov, Nyan Win Htet, A. Balashov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EICONRUSNW.2016.7448308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are two most popular approaches to quantitative risk analysis. The first approach is based on business process simulation used in the @RISK system (Palisade Corporation). The second approach to risk assessment is analytical. The article compares these two methods of risk analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE NW Russia Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Conference (EIConRusNW)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE NW Russia Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Conference (EIConRusNW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EICONRUSNW.2016.7448308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE NW Russia Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Conference (EIConRusNW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EICONRUSNW.2016.7448308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有两种最流行的定量风险分析方法。第一种方法基于@RISK系统(Palisade Corporation)中使用的业务流程模拟。风险评估的第二种方法是分析性的。本文对这两种风险分析方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk analysis in the model of the business process
There are two most popular approaches to quantitative risk analysis. The first approach is based on business process simulation used in the @RISK system (Palisade Corporation). The second approach to risk assessment is analytical. The article compares these two methods of risk analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信