{"title":"电子设计自动化系统质量的平衡计分卡:EDA公司的实施方法","authors":"Jasjeet Kaur","doi":"10.1109/ISQED.2005.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the semiconductor industry moves into the next generation sub-nanometer design the quality of the electronic design automation (EDA) tools becomes more critical. With shrinking market windows and increasing time to market constraints the designers need reliable and robust EDA software tools to ensure that the design is manufacturable with an acceptable yield. This paper develops a balanced scorecard for implementing systemic quality in an EDA organization.","PeriodicalId":333840,"journal":{"name":"Sixth international symposium on quality electronic design (isqed'05)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A balanced scorecard for systemic quality in electronic design automation: an implementation method for an EDA company\",\"authors\":\"Jasjeet Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISQED.2005.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the semiconductor industry moves into the next generation sub-nanometer design the quality of the electronic design automation (EDA) tools becomes more critical. With shrinking market windows and increasing time to market constraints the designers need reliable and robust EDA software tools to ensure that the design is manufacturable with an acceptable yield. This paper develops a balanced scorecard for implementing systemic quality in an EDA organization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sixth international symposium on quality electronic design (isqed'05)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sixth international symposium on quality electronic design (isqed'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2005.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sixth international symposium on quality electronic design (isqed'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISQED.2005.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A balanced scorecard for systemic quality in electronic design automation: an implementation method for an EDA company
As the semiconductor industry moves into the next generation sub-nanometer design the quality of the electronic design automation (EDA) tools becomes more critical. With shrinking market windows and increasing time to market constraints the designers need reliable and robust EDA software tools to ensure that the design is manufacturable with an acceptable yield. This paper develops a balanced scorecard for implementing systemic quality in an EDA organization.