能力领域的轨迹:形成性评估

C. Galatanu
{"title":"能力领域的轨迹:形成性评估","authors":"C. Galatanu","doi":"10.1109/SIELMEN.2017.8123349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of competence assessment in engineering is analyzed in the context of the lack of motivation for learning. The source of this lack of motivation comes from the distribution of high school students. This assignment creates marginalization for a large number of students. Exit from marginalization can be accomplished through additional motivation. This is the responsibility of the competence assessment system. The proposed system is based on Bloom's taxonomy, with the questions being based on Bloom's verbs. It results an adaptive test system where questions are tailored to each individual's level of training. Another condition for generating motivation is to waive the confidentiality of ratings. The main argument is that this confidentiality supports mediocrity. A tonic competition is preferred. The author's experience demonstrates that this kind of competition is possible, especially using the gamefication. There is also the graphical image of the evolution of competence assessed, called the trajectory in the competence field. The results may have very close scores, but nevertheless the assessment can separate the full skills from the insufficient competencies without diminishing the motivating nature of the test itself.","PeriodicalId":403279,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Electromechanical and Power Systems (SIELMEN)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trajectories in the competence field: During formative assessment\",\"authors\":\"C. Galatanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIELMEN.2017.8123349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of competence assessment in engineering is analyzed in the context of the lack of motivation for learning. The source of this lack of motivation comes from the distribution of high school students. This assignment creates marginalization for a large number of students. Exit from marginalization can be accomplished through additional motivation. This is the responsibility of the competence assessment system. The proposed system is based on Bloom's taxonomy, with the questions being based on Bloom's verbs. It results an adaptive test system where questions are tailored to each individual's level of training. Another condition for generating motivation is to waive the confidentiality of ratings. The main argument is that this confidentiality supports mediocrity. A tonic competition is preferred. The author's experience demonstrates that this kind of competition is possible, especially using the gamefication. There is also the graphical image of the evolution of competence assessed, called the trajectory in the competence field. The results may have very close scores, but nevertheless the assessment can separate the full skills from the insufficient competencies without diminishing the motivating nature of the test itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Electromechanical and Power Systems (SIELMEN)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Electromechanical and Power Systems (SIELMEN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIELMEN.2017.8123349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Electromechanical and Power Systems (SIELMEN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIELMEN.2017.8123349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在缺乏学习动机的背景下,分析了工科学生的能力评估问题。这种缺乏动力的根源来自高中生的分布。这个作业使很多学生被边缘化。摆脱边缘化可以通过额外的动机来实现。这就是能力评估体系的职责所在。所提出的系统基于Bloom的分类法,问题基于Bloom的动词。它产生了一个自适应测试系统,其中的问题是根据每个人的培训水平量身定制的。产生动机的另一个条件是放弃对评级的保密。主要的论点是,这种保密性支持平庸。最好是补品比赛。作者的经验表明,这种竞争是可能的,特别是使用游戏化。还有一种被评估能力演变的图形化图像,在能力领域称为轨迹。结果可能有非常接近的分数,但无论如何,评估可以区分完整的技能和不充分的能力,而不会削弱测试本身的激励性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trajectories in the competence field: During formative assessment
The issue of competence assessment in engineering is analyzed in the context of the lack of motivation for learning. The source of this lack of motivation comes from the distribution of high school students. This assignment creates marginalization for a large number of students. Exit from marginalization can be accomplished through additional motivation. This is the responsibility of the competence assessment system. The proposed system is based on Bloom's taxonomy, with the questions being based on Bloom's verbs. It results an adaptive test system where questions are tailored to each individual's level of training. Another condition for generating motivation is to waive the confidentiality of ratings. The main argument is that this confidentiality supports mediocrity. A tonic competition is preferred. The author's experience demonstrates that this kind of competition is possible, especially using the gamefication. There is also the graphical image of the evolution of competence assessed, called the trajectory in the competence field. The results may have very close scores, but nevertheless the assessment can separate the full skills from the insufficient competencies without diminishing the motivating nature of the test itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信