{"title":"酒精性肝病的药物治疗评价:一项真实世界的回顾性证据研究","authors":"Sandip Shah, S. Gupta","doi":"10.54136/erwej-0202-10021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a hepatoprotective agent demonstrates several beneficial effects on liver biochemistry measures and thus, it might be useful for the management of Alcoholic liver disease (ALD). Objective: To evaluate the pharmacotherapies for ALD using retrospective real-world evidence. Methods: In this retrospective study, the Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) of patients with ALD who were prescribed various pharmacotherapies between January 2021 and April 2021 at two Indian healthcare settings were reviewed. The effectiveness outcomes were assessed in terms of mean difference and proportion of patients showing improvement in the levels of liver enzymes (Aspartate aminotransferase [AST], Alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and γ-glutamyl transferase [GGT]) and conjugated bilirubin from baseline to 30-days follow-up. Results: A total of 298 patients were included and divided into two study groups - scientific and herbal groups. The scientific group included patients prescribed with drugs like UDCA, pentoxifylline, ademetionine, metadoxine, and nutritional supplementation. The herbal group included patients prescribed with four different Herbal Preparations. Of 193 patients in the scientific group, a majority (76.7%; n=148/193) of the patients received UDCA; of these, 107 patients' data were available at the 30-days follow-up. In the herbal group (n=105), a majority (62.9%; n=66/105) of the patients received Herbal Preparation 1, and 78 patients had data at follow-up. The elevated levels of liver enzymes (AST, ALT, GGT) at baseline were significantly reduced (p<0.05) at follow-up in patients prescribed with UDCA vs. Herbal Preparation 1. The change from baseline to 30 days in conjugated bilirubin was significantly higher in the UDCA vs. Herbal Preparation 1 (-45.2% vs. -33.5%, p<0.001). There was considerable improvement in the proportion of patients with elevated AST and ALT in the UDCA group. No serious adverse events were reported in either of the groups. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that UDCA and Herbal Preparation 1 are majorly used in the management of ALD. UDCA has shown a substantial hepatoprotective effect as evident by significant improvements in the liver biochemistry of ALD patients as compared to the Herbal Preparation 1. Overall, the data from the current study suggests the use of UDCA as an initial therapy for ALD patients with altered liver enzymes.","PeriodicalId":312076,"journal":{"name":"Exclusive Real World Evidence Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Pharmacotherapies for Alcoholic Liver Disease: A Retrospective Real-World Evidence Study\",\"authors\":\"Sandip Shah, S. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.54136/erwej-0202-10021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a hepatoprotective agent demonstrates several beneficial effects on liver biochemistry measures and thus, it might be useful for the management of Alcoholic liver disease (ALD). Objective: To evaluate the pharmacotherapies for ALD using retrospective real-world evidence. Methods: In this retrospective study, the Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) of patients with ALD who were prescribed various pharmacotherapies between January 2021 and April 2021 at two Indian healthcare settings were reviewed. The effectiveness outcomes were assessed in terms of mean difference and proportion of patients showing improvement in the levels of liver enzymes (Aspartate aminotransferase [AST], Alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and γ-glutamyl transferase [GGT]) and conjugated bilirubin from baseline to 30-days follow-up. Results: A total of 298 patients were included and divided into two study groups - scientific and herbal groups. The scientific group included patients prescribed with drugs like UDCA, pentoxifylline, ademetionine, metadoxine, and nutritional supplementation. The herbal group included patients prescribed with four different Herbal Preparations. Of 193 patients in the scientific group, a majority (76.7%; n=148/193) of the patients received UDCA; of these, 107 patients' data were available at the 30-days follow-up. In the herbal group (n=105), a majority (62.9%; n=66/105) of the patients received Herbal Preparation 1, and 78 patients had data at follow-up. The elevated levels of liver enzymes (AST, ALT, GGT) at baseline were significantly reduced (p<0.05) at follow-up in patients prescribed with UDCA vs. Herbal Preparation 1. The change from baseline to 30 days in conjugated bilirubin was significantly higher in the UDCA vs. Herbal Preparation 1 (-45.2% vs. -33.5%, p<0.001). There was considerable improvement in the proportion of patients with elevated AST and ALT in the UDCA group. No serious adverse events were reported in either of the groups. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that UDCA and Herbal Preparation 1 are majorly used in the management of ALD. UDCA has shown a substantial hepatoprotective effect as evident by significant improvements in the liver biochemistry of ALD patients as compared to the Herbal Preparation 1. Overall, the data from the current study suggests the use of UDCA as an initial therapy for ALD patients with altered liver enzymes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exclusive Real World Evidence Journal\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exclusive Real World Evidence Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54136/erwej-0202-10021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exclusive Real World Evidence Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54136/erwej-0202-10021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)是一种肝脏保护剂,对肝脏生化指标有多种有益作用,因此可能对酒精性肝病(ALD)的治疗有帮助。目的:用回顾性的真实世界证据评价ALD的药物治疗方法。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,对2021年1月至2021年4月期间在两家印度医疗机构接受各种药物治疗的ALD患者的电子病历(emr)进行了回顾。从基线到随访30天,根据肝酶(天冬氨酸转氨酶[AST]、丙氨酸转氨酶[ALT]和γ-谷氨酰转移酶[GGT])和结合胆红素水平改善的平均差异和患者比例评估有效性结果。结果:共纳入298例患者,分为科学组和中药组。科学组包括服用UDCA、己酮茶碱、腺苷、美他多辛和营养补充剂等药物的患者。草药组包括服用四种不同草药制剂的患者。在193名科学组患者中,大多数(76.7%;n=148/193)的患者接受UDCA;其中,107名患者的数据在30天的随访中可用。在草药组(n=105)中,大多数(62.9%;n=66/105), 78例患者随访时有资料。与中草药制剂1相比,UDCA患者在基线时升高的肝酶(AST, ALT, GGT)水平在随访时显著降低(p<0.05)。从基线到30天,UDCA的结合胆红素变化明显高于草药制剂1 (-45.2% vs -33.5%, p<0.001)。UDCA组AST和ALT升高的患者比例有明显改善。两组均未报告严重不良事件。结论:本研究表明,UDCA和中草药制剂1在ALD治疗中应用较多。与中草药制剂相比,UDCA对ALD患者的肝脏生化有显著改善,显示出实质性的肝保护作用。总的来说,目前研究的数据表明,UDCA可作为肝酶改变的ALD患者的初始治疗方法。
Evaluation of Pharmacotherapies for Alcoholic Liver Disease: A Retrospective Real-World Evidence Study
Background: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a hepatoprotective agent demonstrates several beneficial effects on liver biochemistry measures and thus, it might be useful for the management of Alcoholic liver disease (ALD). Objective: To evaluate the pharmacotherapies for ALD using retrospective real-world evidence. Methods: In this retrospective study, the Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) of patients with ALD who were prescribed various pharmacotherapies between January 2021 and April 2021 at two Indian healthcare settings were reviewed. The effectiveness outcomes were assessed in terms of mean difference and proportion of patients showing improvement in the levels of liver enzymes (Aspartate aminotransferase [AST], Alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and γ-glutamyl transferase [GGT]) and conjugated bilirubin from baseline to 30-days follow-up. Results: A total of 298 patients were included and divided into two study groups - scientific and herbal groups. The scientific group included patients prescribed with drugs like UDCA, pentoxifylline, ademetionine, metadoxine, and nutritional supplementation. The herbal group included patients prescribed with four different Herbal Preparations. Of 193 patients in the scientific group, a majority (76.7%; n=148/193) of the patients received UDCA; of these, 107 patients' data were available at the 30-days follow-up. In the herbal group (n=105), a majority (62.9%; n=66/105) of the patients received Herbal Preparation 1, and 78 patients had data at follow-up. The elevated levels of liver enzymes (AST, ALT, GGT) at baseline were significantly reduced (p<0.05) at follow-up in patients prescribed with UDCA vs. Herbal Preparation 1. The change from baseline to 30 days in conjugated bilirubin was significantly higher in the UDCA vs. Herbal Preparation 1 (-45.2% vs. -33.5%, p<0.001). There was considerable improvement in the proportion of patients with elevated AST and ALT in the UDCA group. No serious adverse events were reported in either of the groups. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that UDCA and Herbal Preparation 1 are majorly used in the management of ALD. UDCA has shown a substantial hepatoprotective effect as evident by significant improvements in the liver biochemistry of ALD patients as compared to the Herbal Preparation 1. Overall, the data from the current study suggests the use of UDCA as an initial therapy for ALD patients with altered liver enzymes.