{"title":"双语对外语科学执行功能的影响分析","authors":"L.G. Gilmullina","doi":"10.35634/2412-9550-2022-32-1-49-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the updated data of meta-analyses of foreign authors dealing with current problems of bilingualism and reveals a number of reasons indicating advantages in the tasks of executive functions in favor of bilingual people. Several researchers have suggested that learning and using a second language requires common executive functions, and many have shown that bilinguals outperform monolinguals in tasks related to these processes. However, recent studies and meta-analyses have questioned whether bilingualism leads to changes in general executive functions. An article by John G. Grundy presents an analysis of 167 independent studies to support the claim of the benefits of bilingualism, excluding random results that would show an equal number of studies in favor of monolinguals than bilinguals. These results cannot be explained by publication bias, publication year, or sample size. Importantly, the analyzed data do not contradict the results regarding the overall size of the effect of bilingualism, and lead to the search for an answer to the question: When do bilinguals outperform monolinguals in performing tasks that involve executive functions?","PeriodicalId":280577,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF BILINGUALISM ON THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS IN FOREIGN SCIENCE\",\"authors\":\"L.G. Gilmullina\",\"doi\":\"10.35634/2412-9550-2022-32-1-49-56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the updated data of meta-analyses of foreign authors dealing with current problems of bilingualism and reveals a number of reasons indicating advantages in the tasks of executive functions in favor of bilingual people. Several researchers have suggested that learning and using a second language requires common executive functions, and many have shown that bilinguals outperform monolinguals in tasks related to these processes. However, recent studies and meta-analyses have questioned whether bilingualism leads to changes in general executive functions. An article by John G. Grundy presents an analysis of 167 independent studies to support the claim of the benefits of bilingualism, excluding random results that would show an equal number of studies in favor of monolinguals than bilinguals. These results cannot be explained by publication bias, publication year, or sample size. Importantly, the analyzed data do not contradict the results regarding the overall size of the effect of bilingualism, and lead to the search for an answer to the question: When do bilinguals outperform monolinguals in performing tasks that involve executive functions?\",\"PeriodicalId\":280577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9550-2022-32-1-49-56\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9550-2022-32-1-49-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文分析了国外作者对当前双语问题的荟萃分析的最新数据,揭示了双语者在执行功能任务方面具有优势的一些原因。一些研究人员认为,学习和使用第二语言需要共同的执行功能,许多研究表明,双语者在与这些过程相关的任务中表现优于单语者。然而,最近的研究和荟萃分析质疑双语是否会导致一般执行功能的变化。John G. Grundy的一篇文章分析了167项独立研究,以支持双语的好处,排除了随机结果,这些随机结果表明,支持单语者和双语者的研究数量相同。这些结果不能用发表偏倚、出版年份或样本量来解释。重要的是,所分析的数据与关于双语影响的总体规模的结果并不矛盾,并导致了对以下问题的答案的探索:在执行涉及执行功能的任务中,双语者何时表现优于单语者?
ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF BILINGUALISM ON THE EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS IN FOREIGN SCIENCE
The article analyzes the updated data of meta-analyses of foreign authors dealing with current problems of bilingualism and reveals a number of reasons indicating advantages in the tasks of executive functions in favor of bilingual people. Several researchers have suggested that learning and using a second language requires common executive functions, and many have shown that bilinguals outperform monolinguals in tasks related to these processes. However, recent studies and meta-analyses have questioned whether bilingualism leads to changes in general executive functions. An article by John G. Grundy presents an analysis of 167 independent studies to support the claim of the benefits of bilingualism, excluding random results that would show an equal number of studies in favor of monolinguals than bilinguals. These results cannot be explained by publication bias, publication year, or sample size. Importantly, the analyzed data do not contradict the results regarding the overall size of the effect of bilingualism, and lead to the search for an answer to the question: When do bilinguals outperform monolinguals in performing tasks that involve executive functions?