从KSTAR项目的经验教训来看,ITER的建设

H. Yang, J. Bak, K. Kim, Y. Oh, Y.S. Kim, B.C. Kim, Y.M. Park, W. Kim, K.R. Park, J. Sa, H. Kim, K. Cho, M. Park, K.H. Kim, T. Ha, K. Park, H. Hong, M. Kwon, G.S. Lee, C. Choi, N. Her, K. Im, B.S. Im, H. S. Jang
{"title":"从KSTAR项目的经验教训来看,ITER的建设","authors":"H. Yang, J. Bak, K. Kim, Y. Oh, Y.S. Kim, B.C. Kim, Y.M. Park, W. Kim, K.R. Park, J. Sa, H. Kim, K. Cho, M. Park, K.H. Kim, T. Ha, K. Park, H. Hong, M. Kwon, G.S. Lee, C. Choi, N. Her, K. Im, B.S. Im, H. S. Jang","doi":"10.1109/SOFE.2011.6052225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction of ITER is an extremely important project, not only within the fusion society but also for mankind: By solving critical energy and environmental problems, another major step in human history will be taken. Design, construction, and assembly of an ultra large scale machine such as ITER require thoroughly well defined plans, strategies, and predictions of potential problems and solutions. It is believed that preceding devices and projects may provide useful references for the several important considerations noted above. The KSTAR (Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research), a representative superconducting tokamak, has the most similar characteristics to the design concept of the ITER. Therefore, the lessons learned from KSTAR can be categorized according to the following engineering aspects: 1) policies to prioritize decisions, 2) catch-up plans for delayed schedules, 3) strategies in site assembly, 4) troubleshooting, 5) standard indexes or guides for tests and acceptance of individual systems and of site assemblies, and 6) interfaces that can be easily omitted in view of the system integration. This paper will summarize the lessons we have learned from the KSTAR project, focusing on engineering related points that can be considered to suggest guidelines for the ITER construction.","PeriodicalId":393592,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE/NPSS 24th Symposium on Fusion Engineering","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The construction of ITER, viewed from lessons learned from the KSTAR project\",\"authors\":\"H. Yang, J. Bak, K. Kim, Y. Oh, Y.S. Kim, B.C. Kim, Y.M. Park, W. Kim, K.R. Park, J. Sa, H. Kim, K. Cho, M. Park, K.H. Kim, T. Ha, K. Park, H. Hong, M. Kwon, G.S. Lee, C. Choi, N. Her, K. Im, B.S. Im, H. S. Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SOFE.2011.6052225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The construction of ITER is an extremely important project, not only within the fusion society but also for mankind: By solving critical energy and environmental problems, another major step in human history will be taken. Design, construction, and assembly of an ultra large scale machine such as ITER require thoroughly well defined plans, strategies, and predictions of potential problems and solutions. It is believed that preceding devices and projects may provide useful references for the several important considerations noted above. The KSTAR (Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research), a representative superconducting tokamak, has the most similar characteristics to the design concept of the ITER. Therefore, the lessons learned from KSTAR can be categorized according to the following engineering aspects: 1) policies to prioritize decisions, 2) catch-up plans for delayed schedules, 3) strategies in site assembly, 4) troubleshooting, 5) standard indexes or guides for tests and acceptance of individual systems and of site assemblies, and 6) interfaces that can be easily omitted in view of the system integration. This paper will summarize the lessons we have learned from the KSTAR project, focusing on engineering related points that can be considered to suggest guidelines for the ITER construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE/NPSS 24th Symposium on Fusion Engineering\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE/NPSS 24th Symposium on Fusion Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOFE.2011.6052225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE/NPSS 24th Symposium on Fusion Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOFE.2011.6052225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

ITER的建设是一项极其重要的工程,不仅对核聚变社会,而且对人类来说都是如此:通过解决关键的能源和环境问题,将在人类历史上迈出又一大步。像ITER这样的超大型机器的设计、建造和组装需要完全明确的计划、策略以及对潜在问题和解决方案的预测。相信前面的设备和项目可以为上面提到的几个重要考虑提供有用的参考。韩国超导托卡马克先进研究所(KSTAR)是超导托卡马克的代表,与ITER的设计理念最相似。因此,从KSTAR吸取的经验教训可以根据以下工程方面进行分类:1)优先决定的策略,2)延迟进度的追赶计划,3)现场组装的策略,4)故障排除,5)单个系统和现场组装的测试和验收的标准索引或指南,以及6)考虑到系统集成可以容易地忽略的接口。本文将总结我们从KSTAR项目中学到的经验教训,重点关注工程相关的问题,可以考虑为ITER的建设提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The construction of ITER, viewed from lessons learned from the KSTAR project
The construction of ITER is an extremely important project, not only within the fusion society but also for mankind: By solving critical energy and environmental problems, another major step in human history will be taken. Design, construction, and assembly of an ultra large scale machine such as ITER require thoroughly well defined plans, strategies, and predictions of potential problems and solutions. It is believed that preceding devices and projects may provide useful references for the several important considerations noted above. The KSTAR (Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research), a representative superconducting tokamak, has the most similar characteristics to the design concept of the ITER. Therefore, the lessons learned from KSTAR can be categorized according to the following engineering aspects: 1) policies to prioritize decisions, 2) catch-up plans for delayed schedules, 3) strategies in site assembly, 4) troubleshooting, 5) standard indexes or guides for tests and acceptance of individual systems and of site assemblies, and 6) interfaces that can be easily omitted in view of the system integration. This paper will summarize the lessons we have learned from the KSTAR project, focusing on engineering related points that can be considered to suggest guidelines for the ITER construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信