图书论坛:宗教、安全和性别:邪恶的三位一体?作者:Maria Alcidi

Maria Alcidi, A. Gribaldo, E. Grande, Carmeliza Rosário, Maria Alcidi
{"title":"图书论坛:宗教、安全和性别:邪恶的三位一体?作者:Maria Alcidi","authors":"Maria Alcidi, A. Gribaldo, E. Grande, Carmeliza Rosário, Maria Alcidi","doi":"10.1163/25891715-bja10042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe paper explores the interplay between religion, security, and gender. By employing a broad analytical security framework ranging from warfare violence against women to violence in the domestic sphere, the paper supports the view that countries with heightened rates of gender inequalities and violence are more insecure and prone to conflict. The paper also questions the role played by religions enforcing hierarchical gender constructs in preserving women’s security and protecting them from gender-based violence. Against this background, the paper maintains that deferring the realisation of women’s security until a comprehensive reform has taken place within the religious precinct must not be an option. Such an approach would signify the capitulation of the egalitarian human rights paradigm. Instead, women’s roles as agents of change within religious institutions should be supported, and the proactive engagement of states to encourage religious institutions to reform and embrace an egalitarian ethos should be promoted. Only in this way will the interplay of religion, security, and gender truly benefit the pursuit of women’s security.","PeriodicalId":108830,"journal":{"name":"Public Anthropologist","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Forum: Religion, Security, and Gender: An Unholy Trinity? by Maria Alcidi\",\"authors\":\"Maria Alcidi, A. Gribaldo, E. Grande, Carmeliza Rosário, Maria Alcidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/25891715-bja10042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe paper explores the interplay between religion, security, and gender. By employing a broad analytical security framework ranging from warfare violence against women to violence in the domestic sphere, the paper supports the view that countries with heightened rates of gender inequalities and violence are more insecure and prone to conflict. The paper also questions the role played by religions enforcing hierarchical gender constructs in preserving women’s security and protecting them from gender-based violence. Against this background, the paper maintains that deferring the realisation of women’s security until a comprehensive reform has taken place within the religious precinct must not be an option. Such an approach would signify the capitulation of the egalitarian human rights paradigm. Instead, women’s roles as agents of change within religious institutions should be supported, and the proactive engagement of states to encourage religious institutions to reform and embrace an egalitarian ethos should be promoted. Only in this way will the interplay of religion, security, and gender truly benefit the pursuit of women’s security.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Anthropologist\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Anthropologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/25891715-bja10042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Anthropologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25891715-bja10042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了宗教、安全和性别之间的相互作用。通过采用广泛的安全分析框架,从战争对妇女的暴力到家庭暴力,本文支持这样一种观点,即性别不平等和暴力发生率较高的国家更不安全,更容易发生冲突。该报告还质疑了宗教在维护妇女安全和保护她们免受基于性别的暴力方面所发挥的作用。在此背景下,该文件坚持认为,在宗教领域内进行全面改革之前推迟实现妇女安全绝不是一种选择。这种做法将意味着对平等主义人权范式的投降。相反,应支持妇女在宗教机构中作为变革推动者的角色,并应促进各国积极参与,鼓励宗教机构进行改革,拥抱平等主义精神。只有这样,宗教、安全、性别三者之间的相互作用,才能真正有利于女性安全的追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Forum: Religion, Security, and Gender: An Unholy Trinity? by Maria Alcidi
The paper explores the interplay between religion, security, and gender. By employing a broad analytical security framework ranging from warfare violence against women to violence in the domestic sphere, the paper supports the view that countries with heightened rates of gender inequalities and violence are more insecure and prone to conflict. The paper also questions the role played by religions enforcing hierarchical gender constructs in preserving women’s security and protecting them from gender-based violence. Against this background, the paper maintains that deferring the realisation of women’s security until a comprehensive reform has taken place within the religious precinct must not be an option. Such an approach would signify the capitulation of the egalitarian human rights paradigm. Instead, women’s roles as agents of change within religious institutions should be supported, and the proactive engagement of states to encourage religious institutions to reform and embrace an egalitarian ethos should be promoted. Only in this way will the interplay of religion, security, and gender truly benefit the pursuit of women’s security.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信