降低三比特误码纠错概率的新型线性SEC-DED码

Michael Richter, Klaus Oberländer, M. Gössel
{"title":"降低三比特误码纠错概率的新型线性SEC-DED码","authors":"Michael Richter, Klaus Oberländer, M. Gössel","doi":"10.1109/IOLTS.2008.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper solves the problem of minimizing triple bit error miscorrection for single-error-correcting, double-error-detecting codes (SEC-DED codes) which are used to protect all kinds of memory against errors. A lower bound for triple bit error miscorrection for the widely used class of odd-weight column codes is derived and actual codes which are very close to that theoretical bound are presented. Surprisingly, significantly better results are obtained with shortened generalized Hamming codes. An optimal (39,32)-SEC-DED code with 32 information bits and 7 control bits is determined which has the lowest risk of triple bit miscorrection of any possible linear (39,32)-code. It is shown how codes with 64 and 128 information bits with significantly lower triple bit miscorrection probability than currently used codes can be derived from that code.The new codes also feature adjacent double bit error correction capabilities (SEC-DED-DAEC codes). Employing them in a SEC-DED-DAEC checker reduces the risk of miscorrecting non-adjacent double bit errors by 27-34% compared to the best codes known.","PeriodicalId":261786,"journal":{"name":"2008 14th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Linear SEC-DED Codes with Reduced Triple Bit Error Miscorrection Probability\",\"authors\":\"Michael Richter, Klaus Oberländer, M. Gössel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IOLTS.2008.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper solves the problem of minimizing triple bit error miscorrection for single-error-correcting, double-error-detecting codes (SEC-DED codes) which are used to protect all kinds of memory against errors. A lower bound for triple bit error miscorrection for the widely used class of odd-weight column codes is derived and actual codes which are very close to that theoretical bound are presented. Surprisingly, significantly better results are obtained with shortened generalized Hamming codes. An optimal (39,32)-SEC-DED code with 32 information bits and 7 control bits is determined which has the lowest risk of triple bit miscorrection of any possible linear (39,32)-code. It is shown how codes with 64 and 128 information bits with significantly lower triple bit miscorrection probability than currently used codes can be derived from that code.The new codes also feature adjacent double bit error correction capabilities (SEC-DED-DAEC codes). Employing them in a SEC-DED-DAEC checker reduces the risk of miscorrecting non-adjacent double bit errors by 27-34% compared to the best codes known.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 14th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 14th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IOLTS.2008.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 14th IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IOLTS.2008.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

摘要

本文解决了用于保护各种存储器的单纠错双检错码(SEC-DED码)的三比特误码纠错最小化问题。导出了广泛使用的奇权列码的三比特误码纠错的下界,并给出了与该理论下界非常接近的实际码。令人惊讶的是,缩短广义汉明码得到了明显更好的结果。确定了具有32个信息位和7个控制位的最优(39,32)-SEC-DED码,该码在任何可能的线性(39,32)码中具有最低的三比特纠错风险。它显示了具有64位和128位信息位的代码如何比当前使用的代码具有明显更低的三比特纠错概率,可以从该代码派生。新代码还具有相邻的双比特纠错功能(sec - ed - daec代码)。与已知的最佳代码相比,在sec - ed - daec检查器中使用它们可将错误纠正非相邻双比特错误的风险降低27-34%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Linear SEC-DED Codes with Reduced Triple Bit Error Miscorrection Probability
This paper solves the problem of minimizing triple bit error miscorrection for single-error-correcting, double-error-detecting codes (SEC-DED codes) which are used to protect all kinds of memory against errors. A lower bound for triple bit error miscorrection for the widely used class of odd-weight column codes is derived and actual codes which are very close to that theoretical bound are presented. Surprisingly, significantly better results are obtained with shortened generalized Hamming codes. An optimal (39,32)-SEC-DED code with 32 information bits and 7 control bits is determined which has the lowest risk of triple bit miscorrection of any possible linear (39,32)-code. It is shown how codes with 64 and 128 information bits with significantly lower triple bit miscorrection probability than currently used codes can be derived from that code.The new codes also feature adjacent double bit error correction capabilities (SEC-DED-DAEC codes). Employing them in a SEC-DED-DAEC checker reduces the risk of miscorrecting non-adjacent double bit errors by 27-34% compared to the best codes known.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信