印度登革热疫情:历史会重演吗?

G. Ahluwalia
{"title":"印度登革热疫情:历史会重演吗?","authors":"G. Ahluwalia","doi":"10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dengue is caused by four flavivirus serotypes (DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 and DEN-4). The incidence of dengue fever (DF) and dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) has increased thirtyfold globally in the last four decades. In developing nations like India, unplanned urbanization and migration of population from rural to urban areas with complete lack of proper sanitation facilities are important factors resulting in this situation. ‘Globalization’ with rapid air travel has also exposed the developed nations to this disease. The situation in our country is reflected by the occurrence of major disease outbreaks in India recent times. However, no reliable data are available to assess the magnitude of the disease in our country. But, obviously, the situation is quite dismal. In the last few years, many major disease outbreaks of dengue have been reported in India. The major pathophysiological abnormality differentiating DF from DHF is the plasma leakage syndrome due to generalized vasculopathy (haemoconcentration, hypo-protein aemia and/or serous effusion). The severity of disease in DHF depends on the quantum of plasma leakage. It is important to appreciate that platelet count is not predictive of haemorrhage. The patients of DHF with excessive plasma loss resulting in shock are labeled as dengue shock syndrome (DSS). DHF/ DSS are potentially fatal conditions if managed inappropriately. Therefore, there is a need to sensitize the health care providers regarding the management principles of DF/DHF. All patients of DF do not need hospitalization. Oral rehydration therapy should be initiated on the first day of the illness in DF as it prevents DHF and decreases risk for hospitalization in these patients. It will not be an exaggeration to state that appropriate hydration is the only therapeutic modality that makes the difference between life and death in a dengue patient. However, dengue patients with warning signs need to be hospitalized. The two most important warning signs which should never be ignored are inability to maintain hydration due to persistent vomiting or abdominal pain and haemetemesis or melaena. In our country with very poor oral dental hygiene in most people, gum bleeding may occur even with mild thrombocytopenia and needs to be considered in proper perspective rather than cause ‘panic’. The other warning sign is dizziness/vertigo on getting up from lying down position, reflecting postural hypotension. The role of platelet transfusion as a panacea for the management of dengue needs special mention. Unfortunately, patients as well as health care workers tend to “chase” platelet counts due to proliferation of “computerized laboratories” with automated ‘coulter’ machines which give almost instant platelet results. Often, the platelet count is underestimated by these computerized machines if they are not manually crosschecked due to the clumping of platelets. In fact, most of these patients are recovering from DF i.e., Patients are afebrile, appetite is normal and have a feeling of well being, but the platelet count is on the “lower side”. It needs to be re-emphasized that health care providers should not treat platelet count in dengue like ‘sensex’ of the share market i.e., An increase or decrease reflecting on the economy of the nation! The focus should be to treat excessive haemoconcentration by hydration and observe for overt bleeding (which is a danger sign irrespective of the platelet count). This “syndrome” of chasing platelet count in DF patients who are otherwise completely asymptomatic and improving can be labelled as “dengue panic syndrome”. Special Feature: Commentary Dengue outbreaks in India:will history keep on repeating itself?","PeriodicalId":405143,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dengue outbreaks in India: will history keep on repeating itself?\",\"authors\":\"G. Ahluwalia\",\"doi\":\"10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.12.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dengue is caused by four flavivirus serotypes (DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 and DEN-4). The incidence of dengue fever (DF) and dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) has increased thirtyfold globally in the last four decades. In developing nations like India, unplanned urbanization and migration of population from rural to urban areas with complete lack of proper sanitation facilities are important factors resulting in this situation. ‘Globalization’ with rapid air travel has also exposed the developed nations to this disease. The situation in our country is reflected by the occurrence of major disease outbreaks in India recent times. However, no reliable data are available to assess the magnitude of the disease in our country. But, obviously, the situation is quite dismal. In the last few years, many major disease outbreaks of dengue have been reported in India. The major pathophysiological abnormality differentiating DF from DHF is the plasma leakage syndrome due to generalized vasculopathy (haemoconcentration, hypo-protein aemia and/or serous effusion). The severity of disease in DHF depends on the quantum of plasma leakage. It is important to appreciate that platelet count is not predictive of haemorrhage. The patients of DHF with excessive plasma loss resulting in shock are labeled as dengue shock syndrome (DSS). DHF/ DSS are potentially fatal conditions if managed inappropriately. Therefore, there is a need to sensitize the health care providers regarding the management principles of DF/DHF. All patients of DF do not need hospitalization. Oral rehydration therapy should be initiated on the first day of the illness in DF as it prevents DHF and decreases risk for hospitalization in these patients. It will not be an exaggeration to state that appropriate hydration is the only therapeutic modality that makes the difference between life and death in a dengue patient. However, dengue patients with warning signs need to be hospitalized. The two most important warning signs which should never be ignored are inability to maintain hydration due to persistent vomiting or abdominal pain and haemetemesis or melaena. In our country with very poor oral dental hygiene in most people, gum bleeding may occur even with mild thrombocytopenia and needs to be considered in proper perspective rather than cause ‘panic’. The other warning sign is dizziness/vertigo on getting up from lying down position, reflecting postural hypotension. The role of platelet transfusion as a panacea for the management of dengue needs special mention. Unfortunately, patients as well as health care workers tend to “chase” platelet counts due to proliferation of “computerized laboratories” with automated ‘coulter’ machines which give almost instant platelet results. Often, the platelet count is underestimated by these computerized machines if they are not manually crosschecked due to the clumping of platelets. In fact, most of these patients are recovering from DF i.e., Patients are afebrile, appetite is normal and have a feeling of well being, but the platelet count is on the “lower side”. It needs to be re-emphasized that health care providers should not treat platelet count in dengue like ‘sensex’ of the share market i.e., An increase or decrease reflecting on the economy of the nation! The focus should be to treat excessive haemoconcentration by hydration and observe for overt bleeding (which is a danger sign irrespective of the platelet count). This “syndrome” of chasing platelet count in DF patients who are otherwise completely asymptomatic and improving can be labelled as “dengue panic syndrome”. Special Feature: Commentary Dengue outbreaks in India:will history keep on repeating itself?\",\"PeriodicalId\":405143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.12.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15380/2277-5706.JCSR.12.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

登革热由四种黄病毒血清型(DEN-1、DEN-2、DEN-3和DEN-4)引起。在过去40年中,全球登革热和登革出血热的发病率增加了30倍。在印度这样的发展中国家,无计划的城市化和人口从农村向城市地区迁移,完全缺乏适当的卫生设施,是导致这种情况的重要因素。伴随着快速航空旅行的“全球化”也使发达国家暴露于这种疾病之下。最近在印度发生的重大疾病爆发反映了我国的局势。然而,没有可靠的数据来评估我国疾病的严重程度。但是,很明显,情况相当令人沮丧。在过去几年中,印度报告了许多重大的登革热疾病暴发。区分DF和DHF的主要病理生理异常是由广泛性血管病变引起的血浆渗漏综合征(血凝、低蛋白血症和/或浆液性积液)。DHF患者的病情严重程度取决于血浆泄漏量。重要的是要认识到血小板计数不能预测出血。登革出血热患者血浆过多导致休克被称为登革休克综合征(DSS)。如果管理不当,DHF/ DSS可能是致命的疾病。因此,有必要提高卫生保健提供者对DF/DHF管理原则的认识。所有DF患者不需要住院治疗。口服补液治疗应在DF发病的第一天开始,因为它可以预防DHF并降低这些患者住院的风险。可以毫不夸张地说,适当的水合作用是决定登革热患者生死的唯一治疗方式。然而,有警告迹象的登革热患者需要住院治疗。两个最重要的警告信号是不能被忽视的:由于持续呕吐或腹痛和呕血或黑绀而无法维持水分。在我国,大多数人的口腔卫生很差,即使有轻微的血小板减少症也可能发生牙龈出血,需要从正确的角度考虑,而不是引起“恐慌”。另一个警告信号是从躺着的位置站起来时头晕/眩晕,反映体位性低血压。血小板输注作为治疗登革热的灵丹妙药的作用需要特别提及。不幸的是,由于“计算机化实验室”的普及,患者和卫生保健工作者倾向于“追逐”血小板计数,这些实验室配备了自动化的“库尔特”机器,几乎可以立即得出血小板结果。通常,由于血小板结块,这些计算机化的机器如果没有人工交叉检查,血小板计数就会被低估。事实上,这些患者大多是从DF中恢复过来的,即患者发热,食欲正常,感觉良好,但血小板计数“偏低”。需要再次强调的是,医疗保健提供者不应将登革热患者的血小板计数视为股票市场的“敏感性”,即,反映国家经济的增减!重点应该是通过水合治疗过度血凝,并观察明显出血(这是一个危险的迹象,与血小板计数无关)。在完全无症状且正在改善的DF患者中,这种追逐血小板计数的“综合征”可被标记为“登革热恐慌综合征”。印度登革热疫情:历史还会重演吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dengue outbreaks in India: will history keep on repeating itself?
Dengue is caused by four flavivirus serotypes (DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 and DEN-4). The incidence of dengue fever (DF) and dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) has increased thirtyfold globally in the last four decades. In developing nations like India, unplanned urbanization and migration of population from rural to urban areas with complete lack of proper sanitation facilities are important factors resulting in this situation. ‘Globalization’ with rapid air travel has also exposed the developed nations to this disease. The situation in our country is reflected by the occurrence of major disease outbreaks in India recent times. However, no reliable data are available to assess the magnitude of the disease in our country. But, obviously, the situation is quite dismal. In the last few years, many major disease outbreaks of dengue have been reported in India. The major pathophysiological abnormality differentiating DF from DHF is the plasma leakage syndrome due to generalized vasculopathy (haemoconcentration, hypo-protein aemia and/or serous effusion). The severity of disease in DHF depends on the quantum of plasma leakage. It is important to appreciate that platelet count is not predictive of haemorrhage. The patients of DHF with excessive plasma loss resulting in shock are labeled as dengue shock syndrome (DSS). DHF/ DSS are potentially fatal conditions if managed inappropriately. Therefore, there is a need to sensitize the health care providers regarding the management principles of DF/DHF. All patients of DF do not need hospitalization. Oral rehydration therapy should be initiated on the first day of the illness in DF as it prevents DHF and decreases risk for hospitalization in these patients. It will not be an exaggeration to state that appropriate hydration is the only therapeutic modality that makes the difference between life and death in a dengue patient. However, dengue patients with warning signs need to be hospitalized. The two most important warning signs which should never be ignored are inability to maintain hydration due to persistent vomiting or abdominal pain and haemetemesis or melaena. In our country with very poor oral dental hygiene in most people, gum bleeding may occur even with mild thrombocytopenia and needs to be considered in proper perspective rather than cause ‘panic’. The other warning sign is dizziness/vertigo on getting up from lying down position, reflecting postural hypotension. The role of platelet transfusion as a panacea for the management of dengue needs special mention. Unfortunately, patients as well as health care workers tend to “chase” platelet counts due to proliferation of “computerized laboratories” with automated ‘coulter’ machines which give almost instant platelet results. Often, the platelet count is underestimated by these computerized machines if they are not manually crosschecked due to the clumping of platelets. In fact, most of these patients are recovering from DF i.e., Patients are afebrile, appetite is normal and have a feeling of well being, but the platelet count is on the “lower side”. It needs to be re-emphasized that health care providers should not treat platelet count in dengue like ‘sensex’ of the share market i.e., An increase or decrease reflecting on the economy of the nation! The focus should be to treat excessive haemoconcentration by hydration and observe for overt bleeding (which is a danger sign irrespective of the platelet count). This “syndrome” of chasing platelet count in DF patients who are otherwise completely asymptomatic and improving can be labelled as “dengue panic syndrome”. Special Feature: Commentary Dengue outbreaks in India:will history keep on repeating itself?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信