分析开关电容DC-DC变换器的四种设计环境的比较

Alina-Teodora Grăjdeanu, C. Răducan, C. Pleşa, B. Kirei, M. Neag
{"title":"分析开关电容DC-DC变换器的四种设计环境的比较","authors":"Alina-Teodora Grăjdeanu, C. Răducan, C. Pleşa, B. Kirei, M. Neag","doi":"10.1109/ISETC.2016.7781088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the performance of four popular design environments for analog and mixed-signal applications - Virtuoso from Cadence Inc., SIMetrix/SIMPLIS, Simulink and CppSim - when used for system level analysis of a standard switched capacitor DC-DC converter. Virtuoso is the most expensive of the four but it has the best user interface and its Spice-level circuit simulators provide very good accuracy. Also, it allows complete top-down design, from system- to circuit-level within the same environment. However, it may not be best suited for first-pass system-level analysis of switching circuits such as DC-DC converters due to its long simulation time and convergence issues. Numerical solvers such as MATLAB - Simulink and CppSim represent functional blocks by input-state-output relationships, thus avoiding the solving of large sets of simultaneous equations. This reduces dramatically the simulation time at the expense of poorer accuracy. SIMetrix/SIMPLIS converts non-linear models to a piecewise linear straight-line model achieving a fast simulation time for switching circuits. For a fair comparison, the same circuit was analyzed under the same conditions by using the four design environments; the trade-offs between cost, accuracy and simulation time are highlighted.","PeriodicalId":238901,"journal":{"name":"2016 12th IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of four design environments employed to analyze a switched-capacitor DC-DC converter\",\"authors\":\"Alina-Teodora Grăjdeanu, C. Răducan, C. Pleşa, B. Kirei, M. Neag\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISETC.2016.7781088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the performance of four popular design environments for analog and mixed-signal applications - Virtuoso from Cadence Inc., SIMetrix/SIMPLIS, Simulink and CppSim - when used for system level analysis of a standard switched capacitor DC-DC converter. Virtuoso is the most expensive of the four but it has the best user interface and its Spice-level circuit simulators provide very good accuracy. Also, it allows complete top-down design, from system- to circuit-level within the same environment. However, it may not be best suited for first-pass system-level analysis of switching circuits such as DC-DC converters due to its long simulation time and convergence issues. Numerical solvers such as MATLAB - Simulink and CppSim represent functional blocks by input-state-output relationships, thus avoiding the solving of large sets of simultaneous equations. This reduces dramatically the simulation time at the expense of poorer accuracy. SIMetrix/SIMPLIS converts non-linear models to a piecewise linear straight-line model achieving a fast simulation time for switching circuits. For a fair comparison, the same circuit was analyzed under the same conditions by using the four design environments; the trade-offs between cost, accuracy and simulation time are highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":238901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 12th IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 12th IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISETC.2016.7781088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 12th IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISETC.2016.7781088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了用于模拟和混合信号应用的四种流行设计环境(Cadence Inc.的Virtuoso、SIMetrix/SIMPLIS、Simulink和CppSim)在用于标准开关电容DC-DC转换器的系统级分析时的性能。Virtuoso是四个中最贵的,但它有最好的用户界面,它的spice级电路模拟器提供了非常好的精度。此外,它允许在同一环境中完成从系统到电路级的自顶向下设计。然而,由于其模拟时间长和收敛性问题,它可能不太适合于DC-DC转换器等开关电路的一次通过系统级分析。MATLAB - Simulink和CppSim等数值求解器通过输入-状态-输出关系来表示功能块,从而避免了求解大型联立方程组。这大大减少了模拟时间,但代价是准确性较差。simmetrix /SIMPLIS将非线性模型转换为分段线性直线模型,实现开关电路的快速仿真时间。为了公平比较,在相同条件下,使用四种设计环境对同一电路进行分析;强调了成本、精度和仿真时间之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of four design environments employed to analyze a switched-capacitor DC-DC converter
This paper compares the performance of four popular design environments for analog and mixed-signal applications - Virtuoso from Cadence Inc., SIMetrix/SIMPLIS, Simulink and CppSim - when used for system level analysis of a standard switched capacitor DC-DC converter. Virtuoso is the most expensive of the four but it has the best user interface and its Spice-level circuit simulators provide very good accuracy. Also, it allows complete top-down design, from system- to circuit-level within the same environment. However, it may not be best suited for first-pass system-level analysis of switching circuits such as DC-DC converters due to its long simulation time and convergence issues. Numerical solvers such as MATLAB - Simulink and CppSim represent functional blocks by input-state-output relationships, thus avoiding the solving of large sets of simultaneous equations. This reduces dramatically the simulation time at the expense of poorer accuracy. SIMetrix/SIMPLIS converts non-linear models to a piecewise linear straight-line model achieving a fast simulation time for switching circuits. For a fair comparison, the same circuit was analyzed under the same conditions by using the four design environments; the trade-offs between cost, accuracy and simulation time are highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信