Yin Hu, T. Houston, R. Rajgopal, K. Joyner, C. Teng
{"title":"256 Mbit SOI DRAM应用的隔离技术","authors":"Yin Hu, T. Houston, R. Rajgopal, K. Joyner, C. Teng","doi":"10.1109/SOI.1995.526443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various isolation techniques on SOI wafer were examined for the 256 Mbit DRAM application. The LOCOS technique results in good isolation down to 0.6 /spl mu/m pitch, in terms of encroachment and subthreshold characteristics. The encroachment of SOI wafers is slightly better than that of bulk wafers on the thick SOI wafers and expect to be even better on the thin SOI wafers. It is the most efficient way to adopt LOCOS isolation for the 256 Mbit SOI DRAM because of many years of process development experience in the bulk technology. In addition, the LOCOS isolation provides no edge leakage to the devices on SOI wafers. However, the LOCOS isolation technique may be limited as the DRAM cell pitch continue to scale down. The MESA isolation provides encroachment free for all ranges of SOI thickness. However, the MESA isolation morphology varies with the size of the isolation region. This could introduce edge leakage in devices with wide isolation region. The morphology variation can be solved with Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) technology and it is expected not to be an issue in the near future. The edge leakage can be suppressed by angled channel stop implant and with mesa corner rounding treatment. As the DRAM cell pitch continue to scale down, the MESA isolation technique may be the only candidate for the 1 Gbit and beyond SOI DRAM.","PeriodicalId":149490,"journal":{"name":"1995 IEEE International SOI Conference Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolation techniques for 256 Mbit SOI DRAM application\",\"authors\":\"Yin Hu, T. Houston, R. Rajgopal, K. Joyner, C. Teng\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SOI.1995.526443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various isolation techniques on SOI wafer were examined for the 256 Mbit DRAM application. The LOCOS technique results in good isolation down to 0.6 /spl mu/m pitch, in terms of encroachment and subthreshold characteristics. The encroachment of SOI wafers is slightly better than that of bulk wafers on the thick SOI wafers and expect to be even better on the thin SOI wafers. It is the most efficient way to adopt LOCOS isolation for the 256 Mbit SOI DRAM because of many years of process development experience in the bulk technology. In addition, the LOCOS isolation provides no edge leakage to the devices on SOI wafers. However, the LOCOS isolation technique may be limited as the DRAM cell pitch continue to scale down. The MESA isolation provides encroachment free for all ranges of SOI thickness. However, the MESA isolation morphology varies with the size of the isolation region. This could introduce edge leakage in devices with wide isolation region. The morphology variation can be solved with Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) technology and it is expected not to be an issue in the near future. The edge leakage can be suppressed by angled channel stop implant and with mesa corner rounding treatment. As the DRAM cell pitch continue to scale down, the MESA isolation technique may be the only candidate for the 1 Gbit and beyond SOI DRAM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1995 IEEE International SOI Conference Proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1995 IEEE International SOI Conference Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOI.1995.526443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1995 IEEE International SOI Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOI.1995.526443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
针对256 Mbit DRAM应用,研究了SOI晶圆上的各种隔离技术。在入侵和亚阈值特性方面,LOCOS技术的隔离效果很好,低至0.6 /spl mu/m间距。SOI晶圆在厚SOI晶圆上的侵蚀性能略好于大块晶圆,在薄SOI晶圆上的侵蚀性能有望更好。由于在批量技术方面多年的工艺开发经验,对于256 Mbit SOI DRAM采用LOCOS隔离是最有效的方法。此外,LOCOS隔离不会为SOI晶圆上的器件提供边缘泄漏。然而,随着DRAM单元间距的不断缩小,LOCOS隔离技术可能会受到限制。MESA隔离为所有SOI厚度范围提供无侵蚀。然而,MESA隔离形态随隔离区的大小而变化。这可能会在具有宽隔离区域的器件中引入边缘泄漏。化学机械抛光(CMP)技术可以解决形貌的变化,预计在不久的将来不会成为一个问题。通过有角度的通道阻塞植入和台面圆角处理可以抑制边缘泄漏。随着DRAM单元间距的不断缩小,MESA隔离技术可能是1gbit及以上SOI DRAM的唯一候选技术。
Isolation techniques for 256 Mbit SOI DRAM application
Various isolation techniques on SOI wafer were examined for the 256 Mbit DRAM application. The LOCOS technique results in good isolation down to 0.6 /spl mu/m pitch, in terms of encroachment and subthreshold characteristics. The encroachment of SOI wafers is slightly better than that of bulk wafers on the thick SOI wafers and expect to be even better on the thin SOI wafers. It is the most efficient way to adopt LOCOS isolation for the 256 Mbit SOI DRAM because of many years of process development experience in the bulk technology. In addition, the LOCOS isolation provides no edge leakage to the devices on SOI wafers. However, the LOCOS isolation technique may be limited as the DRAM cell pitch continue to scale down. The MESA isolation provides encroachment free for all ranges of SOI thickness. However, the MESA isolation morphology varies with the size of the isolation region. This could introduce edge leakage in devices with wide isolation region. The morphology variation can be solved with Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) technology and it is expected not to be an issue in the near future. The edge leakage can be suppressed by angled channel stop implant and with mesa corner rounding treatment. As the DRAM cell pitch continue to scale down, the MESA isolation technique may be the only candidate for the 1 Gbit and beyond SOI DRAM.